Battlefield 3 - Main Thread

2011-08-09 21:05:35

#5276

-Sh1fty-: plundering yee booty; +510|5752|Ventura, California

Doctor Strangelove wrote:
[-DER-]Omega wrote:
Doctor Strangelove wrote:
All the Rush maps heavily favor the defenders.
orly?

http://www.bfbc2.eu/en/pc/statistik

makes sense since I find myself winning a lot more than not as attacker
As there are more total wins than loses, when they are supposed to be even I call into question the veracity of those stats.

And I have never seen the attackers win on Oasis. Ever. Along with that one jungle map with the light house it's pretty much impossible to win as attackers.

You serious? Valparaiso right? That map is easy with just ONE good squad of attackers. I usually get through the line of defense but I can't defend the bomb.

And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.

2011-08-09 21:34:31

#5277

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6953|Canberra, AUS

How often do you get one good squad of attackers?

That map is pretty slanted in favour of defense, tbh.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2011-08-09 21:35:56

#5278

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5637|London, England

Valparaiso is easy as the attacker if you just AT4 the MCOMs

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2011-08-09 21:37:35

#5279

-Sh1fty-: plundering yee booty; +510|5752|Ventura, California

Jay wrote:
Valparaiso is easy as the attacker if you just AT4 the MCOMs

I can get past the first 3 sets of MCOMs extremely quickly, by myself, with AT4s.

Spark, stop playing with a squad of pub nubs, play with friends who have mics and a brain.

And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.

2011-08-09 21:45:47

#5280

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5864

In the last patch you'll need at least 20 AT4's (with high explosives) to take out a single mcom.

When was the last time either of you played bad company?

2011-08-09 21:47:49

#5281

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6747

Macbeth wrote:
In the last patch you'll need at least 20 AT4's (with high explosives) to take out a single mcom.

When was the last time either of you played bad company?

I never understood why they keep buffing the MCOM health. Attacking is hard enough.

2011-08-09 21:48:55

#5282

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5637|London, England

Macbeth wrote:
In the last patch you'll need at least 20 AT4's (with high explosives) to take out a single mcom.

When was the last time either of you played bad company?

Over a year ago.

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2011-08-09 21:53:22

#5283

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5864

Jay wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
In the last patch you'll need at least 20 AT4's (with high explosives) to take out a single mcom.

When was the last time either of you played bad company?
Over a year ago.

Well I guess commenting on how hard or easy a map is after a year's worth of patches and updates you haven't tried is pretty ignorant of you eh?

I never understood why they keep buffing the MCOM health. Attacking is hard enough.

On the PC it's harder because of more players but on the PS3 if one guy got through him and his whole squad would blow the mcoms to hell in a suicide attack before they got butchered by the rest of the team. One guy could bring the mcom down 30% by himself back then ffs.

Last edited by Macbeth (2011-08-09 21:54:08)

2011-08-09 21:54:22

#5284

-Sh1fty-: plundering yee booty; +510|5752|Ventura, California

Macbeth wrote:
In the last patch you'll need at least 20 AT4's (with high explosives) to take out a single mcom.

When was the last time either of you played bad company?

June 30th 2010

And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.

2011-08-09 21:55:42

#5285

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5864

That was a rhetorical question. I already knew that.

Last edited by Macbeth (2011-08-09 21:55:59)

2011-08-10 00:44:02

#5286

globefish23: sophisticated slacker; +334|6602|Graz, Austria

Naturn wrote:
If I remember correctly in BF2. Air battles were determined by who can fly the slowest not the fastest.

https://img718.imageshack.us/img718/7148/vlcsnap3995208300x228.png

2011-08-10 09:47:59

#5287

jord: Member; +2,382|6957|The North, beyond the wall.

FatherTed wrote:
Ilocano wrote:
jord wrote:

Agreed Val isn't that hard to win.
Yeah, really. All it takes is HALO jumping from the rear.
or jord gunning and me flying

this

2011-08-10 12:39:26

#5288

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|6946

jord wrote:
FatherTed wrote:
Ilocano wrote:

Yeah, really. All it takes is HALO jumping from the rear.
or jord gunning and me flying
this

Yes, that. But you need a couple more teammates to make the jump and arm the MCOM's.

2011-08-10 17:03:25

#5289

bugz: Fission Mailed; +3,311|6591

Detail

Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/ebug122

2011-08-10 19:05:46

#5290

Trotskygrad: бля; +354|6278|Vortex Ring State

if it looks like that in game I shall shit my self before it shits all over my graphics card

2011-08-10 20:23:23

#5291

-Sh1fty-: plundering yee booty; +510|5752|Ventura, California

That is a screenshot from "Thunder Run", there is no photoshop to it, that is completely 100% ingame. EA posted it a while back saying so.

And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.

2011-08-10 21:43:38

#5292

Spearhead: Gulf coast redneck hippy; +731|6969|Tampa Bay Florida

EA said so, so it must be true. Good luck running it on a 2 (or more) year old pc lol

2011-08-10 21:44:31

#5293

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6970|Devon, England

Sweet, less than a year old PC here

2011-08-10 21:48:54

#5294

-Sh1fty-: plundering yee booty; +510|5752|Ventura, California

Spearhead wrote:
EA said so, so it must be true. Good luck running it on a 2 (or more) year old pc lol

Depends on what you had 2 years ago. Top stuff 2 years ago might run this well.

And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.

2011-08-10 22:20:30

#5295

Sisco: grandmaster league revivalist; +493|6622

MP is gonna be scaled down, I´m sure. And who needs SP anyway.

https://www.abload.de/img/bf3-bf2ssig0250wvn.jpg

2011-08-10 23:26:00

#5296

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,742|7016|Cinncinatti

i needed sp when my internet was shite

2011-08-10 23:37:11

#5297

Spearhead: Gulf coast redneck hippy; +731|6969|Tampa Bay Florida

Sisco wrote:
MP is gonna be scaled down, I´m sure. And who needs SP anyway.

Singeplayer and co-op is good for the 40 year olds and noobs who need a narrative to make them feel as if their in a "real" war. Bad co. and 2 were good campaigns compared to the Michael Bay of video games, Call of Duty, but you really have to wonder what that has to do with the actual game we really care about. It doesnt matter in the end how many buildings you can destroy, it matters how the game functions when 30, 40, 50 or 60 people are playing it and if that results in lower sales, then charge everyone 5 bucks every 6 months. BF2 over 6 years I would've easily paid monthly for, pay for it when you want to play it and don't pay for it when you dont want to play it.

Don't abandon the loyalists and people who loved the series in the first place just because you want to make more money. That is something CoD did long ago with CoD2 and look how it turned out...

Last edited by Spearhead (2011-08-10 23:40:30)

2011-08-11 03:16:56

#5298

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,816|6385|eXtreme to the maX

Spearhead wrote:
That is something CoD did long ago with CoD2 and look how it turned out...

They made a ton of money didn't they?

http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/BF3_tank_02.jpg?cb=1313017407

New PC here I come.

Um, I, er, need it for Solidworks

Fuck Israel

2011-08-11 03:49:04

#5299

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6844|Area 51

Man that looks so incredibly good. Too bad my PC won't be able to display such fancy graphics :>

2011-08-11 03:53:27

#5300

Camm: Feeding the Cats.; +761|5247|Dundee, Scotland.

Holy fucking fuck. That looks unbelievably stunning.

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.

BF2S Forums Battlefield 3 - Main Thread

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

[-DER-]Omega wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Jay wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Jay wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Naturn wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

jord wrote:

jord wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

Sisco wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

Board footer