It would be drastic. Perception is reality, and consumer confidence is a delicate flower.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
my default position is not that government is good or benevolent. the alternative just happens to be worse.Jay wrote:
No, it's not. Why is your default position that government is good and benevolent and necessary for a nation to function? Are you that rudderless that you feel you need leadership from above telling you how to live your life? Pretty sad.Reciprocity wrote:
they'll never academically understand, they should see and feel what happens. their concept of libertarianism and "small government" is a first world luxury.
^ Is as lame as lowing's 'Democrats hate freedom' rants.Jay wrote:
Because he wants fiscal sanity and a government that doesn't monkey with the economy? Ok.eleven bravo wrote:
i blame ron paul for all this shit
That's why he is a bad campaigner. He should learn to pick his battles. Even if they are just a matter of principle.RAIMIUS wrote:
Actually, I would say Ron Paul is one of the few who don't always do whatever is politically expedient.
...opposing giving Rosa Parks a medal because tax money shouldn't go to giving awards was an interesting example.
That's why spending cuts and entitlement reform have to be part of the discussion...or you wind up right back here in a few years, if that.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
So keep the debt ceiling and we default.
Raise it and we'll just spend more putting us right back at the start, creating a never-ending cycle?
We end up back here in a few years anyways. We're gonna start spending like crazy within a couple years anyways. We have a short memory.FEOS wrote:
That's why spending cuts and entitlement reform have to be part of the discussion...or you wind up right back here in a few years, if that.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
So keep the debt ceiling and we default.
Raise it and we'll just spend more putting us right back at the start, creating a never-ending cycle?
This is all too true.Commie Killer wrote:
We end up back here in a few years anyways. We're gonna start spending like crazy within a couple years anyways. We have a short memory.FEOS wrote:
That's why spending cuts and entitlement reform have to be part of the discussion...or you wind up right back here in a few years, if that.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
So keep the debt ceiling and we default.
Raise it and we'll just spend more putting us right back at the start, creating a never-ending cycle?
That's the purpose of implementing spending cuts, as well as the intent of putting in a cap based on a percentage of GDP, and introducing a balanced budget amendment. Haven't seen much discussion on the pros/cons of the cut/cap/balance plan, though. Most arguments against the balanced budget amendment are that you have to leave enough of an opening for Congress to do its job that it makes it essentially meaningless. Don't see any issue with capping our budget based on a percentage of GDP, though, then requiring a supermajority to exceed that.Commie Killer wrote:
We end up back here in a few years anyways. We're gonna start spending like crazy within a couple years anyways. We have a short memory.
So if its a Republican congress signing off for a Republican President how is that the Dems fault?FEOS wrote:
This isn't a dictatorship, Dilbert. Congress passes the law that raises the debt ceiling, then the President signs it.
Seriously...how many times do we have to tell you how things work here?
That's for a minority of the period shown. And where exactly did I lay all blame at the Dems' feet?Dilbert_X wrote:
So if its a Republican congress signing off for a Republican President how is that the Dems fault?FEOS wrote:
This isn't a dictatorship, Dilbert. Congress passes the law that raises the debt ceiling, then the President signs it.
Seriously...how many times do we have to tell you how things work here?
Just wondering.
I'm sure we will find ways to circumvent any of those speed traps. All good ideas, they just forget we're humans.FEOS wrote:
That's the purpose of implementing spending cuts, as well as the intent of putting in a cap based on a percentage of GDP, and introducing a balanced budget amendment. Haven't seen much discussion on the pros/cons of the cut/cap/balance plan, though. Most arguments against the balanced budget amendment are that you have to leave enough of an opening for Congress to do its job that it makes it essentially meaningless. Don't see any issue with capping our budget based on a percentage of GDP, though, then requiring a supermajority to exceed that.Commie Killer wrote:
We end up back here in a few years anyways. We're gonna start spending like crazy within a couple years anyways. We have a short memory.
Last edited by Commie Killer (2011-07-26 21:24:42)
eleven bravo wrote:
its crazy how everything in life ends up turning into a bell cosine curve
Last edited by Jay (2011-07-27 15:47:48)
Central limit theorem says exactly that - in the words of my freshman physics lecturer, "if you put enough shit on a graph, you get a Gaussian!" (ie. a Bell curve)eleven bravo wrote:
its crazy how everything in life ends up turning into a bell curve
They wouldn't lose either.Shocking wrote:
After seeing those idiots with their 'hold the line' signs on TV, somewhere deep down I'm hoping the US defaults so they lose their jobs and houses. Let's see if they still think it's a good idea after it actually happens.
Ignorant people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Robert Scoble wrote:
This picture says it all about what's wrong with our culture, our country, our conversations. We have painted ourselves into a corner and no one is willing to give. These two guys are playing a dangerous game of chicken with our economy.
Will one of them blink? If so, when?
It's time for one of them to. And, no, I won't tell you which one it should be because that would be adding to the problem.
Every industry will be hit because it would be a global catastrophe and the international markets would lose their trust in the dollar and the US. Chances are, a lot of people would lose their jobs.Jay wrote:
They wouldn't lose either.Shocking wrote:
After seeing those idiots with their 'hold the line' signs on TV, somewhere deep down I'm hoping the US defaults so they lose their jobs and houses. Let's see if they still think it's a good idea after it actually happens.
Ignorant people shouldn't be allowed to vote.