More to my point, AQ, knows exactly what they are doing and why and who they are doing it to. THere simply is no comparison to this Norwegian Timothy McViegh and AQ. He man acted alone, if this was some Christian backed attack, there would be more problems than this one guy doing this one thing.Dilbert_X wrote:
We're talking about motivation, not direction....
Maybe so, its hard to know what is justification and what is motivation in the brain of someone with such disturbed thought patterns.Jenspm wrote:
I think he used Christianity as an excuse rather than a way of life/belief.
Fuck Israel
Again, we're talking about motivation, not direction or backing.lowing wrote:
More to my point, AQ, knows exactly what they are doing and why and who they are doing it to. THere simply is no comparison to this Norwegian Timothy McViegh and AQ. He man acted alone, if this was some Christian backed attack, there would be more problems than this one guy doing this one thing.Dilbert_X wrote:
We're talking about motivation, not direction....
Fuck Israel
This thread is brilliant. We can always use this as proof once and for all that lowing is a one-eyed hater of Islam and nothing more
Well for some Christian crusade to rid the land of Islam, he sure is kinda alone isn't he? but hey congrats, you caught the elusive CHRISTIAN OBL, and did it in less than half a day. Way to be on your game in cracking this world wide terror network and bringing down its holy war.Dilbert_X wrote:
lowing wrote:
Please show me here he did this in the name of Christianity.Fruitcake wrote:
"I prayed for the first time in a very long time today. I explained to God that unless he wanted the Marxist-Islamic alliance and the certain Islamic takeover of Europe to completely annihilate European Christendom within the next hundred years he must ensure that the warriors fighting for the preservation of European Christendom prevail."
Last edited by lowing (2011-07-25 04:47:53)
You don't need this thread for that, just ask me and I will make it clear I hate Islam. I also am no fan of this guy either, but it is hardly a Christian conspiracyJaekus wrote:
This thread is brilliant. We can always use this as proof once and for all that lowing is a one-eyed hater of Islam and nothing more
Last edited by lowing (2011-07-25 04:49:49)
His motivation was political, unless immigration issues is a religious issue now.Dilbert_X wrote:
Again, we're talking about motivation, not direction or backing.lowing wrote:
More to my point, AQ, knows exactly what they are doing and why and who they are doing it to. THere simply is no comparison to this Norwegian Timothy McViegh and AQ. He man acted alone, if this was some Christian backed attack, there would be more problems than this one guy doing this one thing.Dilbert_X wrote:
We're talking about motivation, not direction....
He certainly takes issue with Muslim ideology, beyond immigration.lowing wrote:
His motivation was political, unless immigration issues is a religious issue now.Dilbert_X wrote:
Again, we're talking about motivation, not direction or backing.lowing wrote:
More to my point, AQ, knows exactly what they are doing and why and who they are doing it to. THere simply is no comparison to this Norwegian Timothy McViegh and AQ. He man acted alone, if this was some Christian backed attack, there would be more problems than this one guy doing this one thing.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
He was only whining about muslim immigration wasn't he? If he were whining about all immigration that would be political.lowing wrote:
His motivation was political, unless immigration issues is a religious issue now.
Third time, we're talking about motivation.Well for some Christian crusade to rid the land of Islam, he sure is kinda alone isn't he? but hey congrats, you caught the elusive CHRISTIAN OBL, and did it in less than half a day. Way to be on your game in cracking this world wide terror network and bringing down its holy war.
Fuck Israel
So? He wants that ideology out of Norway. Hitler wanted the Jews out as well, don't recall anyone describing his efforts as a religiously motivated holy war.Kmar wrote:
He certainly takes issue with Muslim ideology, beyond immigration.lowing wrote:
His motivation was political, unless immigration issues is a religious issue now.Dilbert_X wrote:
Again, we're talking about motivation, not direction or backing.
o.Olowing wrote:
So? He wants that ideology out of Norway. Hitler wanted the Jews out as well, don't recall anyone describing his efforts as a religiously motivated holy war.
Fuck Israel
I think I read where he was bitching about all immigration but ESPECIALLY Muslims. I can only assume that is because there is a greater stampede of Muslims into Norway than say, Mexicans.Dilbert_X wrote:
He was only whining about muslim immigration wasn't he? If he were whining about all immigration that would be political.lowing wrote:
His motivation was political, unless immigration issues is a religious issue now.Third time, we're talking about motivation.Well for some Christian crusade to rid the land of Islam, he sure is kinda alone isn't he? but hey congrats, you caught the elusive CHRISTIAN OBL, and did it in less than half a day. Way to be on your game in cracking this world wide terror network and bringing down its holy war.
Right, and Muslims want Westerners out of the ME.. so they aren't religiously motivated as well. Selective logic you have here.lowing wrote:
So? He wants that ideology out of Norway. Hitler wanted the Jews out as well, don't recall anyone describing his efforts as a religiously motivated holy war.Kmar wrote:
He certainly takes issue with Muslim ideology, beyond immigration.lowing wrote:
His motivation was political, unless immigration issues is a religious issue now.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Yes and his motivation was to keep Norway, Norwegian. Political.Dilbert_X wrote:
He was only whining about muslim immigration wasn't he? If he were whining about all immigration that would be political.lowing wrote:
His motivation was political, unless immigration issues is a religious issue now.Third time, we're talking about motivation.Well for some Christian crusade to rid the land of Islam, he sure is kinda alone isn't he? but hey congrats, you caught the elusive CHRISTIAN OBL, and did it in less than half a day. Way to be on your game in cracking this world wide terror network and bringing down its holy war.
Nope that is a good point actually. Except when 911 happened we were not in the ME., nor were we there when Pan Am blew up over Scotland, small details you missed for that argument. Also there is no reason to expect Islamic terrorism would cease by merely ending the war in Afghanistan or Iraq.Kmar wrote:
Right, and Muslims want Westerners out of the ME.. so they aren't religiously motivated as well. Selective logic you have here.lowing wrote:
So? He wants that ideology out of Norway. Hitler wanted the Jews out as well, don't recall anyone describing his efforts as a religiously motivated holy war.Kmar wrote:
He certainly takes issue with Muslim ideology, beyond immigration.
So why are you always ranting about Muslims then lowing? Are Mexicans not the bigger problem for you?lowing wrote:
I think I read where he was bitching about all immigration but ESPECIALLY Muslims.
Lets assume he's an anti-muslim fruitcake motivated by some warped view of Christianity since thats what the evidence so far suggests.I can only assume that is because there is a greater stampede of Muslims into Norway than say, Mexicans.
Or we can assume stuff based on guesses pulled out of your head.
Yes, the US was, in various forms, but lets not derail this into another 9/11 anti-muslim rant.Nope that is a good point actually. Except when 911 happened we were not in the ME.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-07-25 05:07:37)
Fuck Israel
You seem excited.Jaekus wrote:
This thread is brilliant. We can always use this as proof once and for all that lowing is a one-eyed hater of Islam and nothing more
Those events did not just suddenly happen. There's a whole history leading up to them; the muslim extremists didn't just pick us to bomb because "allah said so".lowing wrote:
Nope that is a good point actually. Except when 911 happened we were not in the ME., nor were we there when Pan Am blew up over Scotland, small details you missed for that argument. Also there is no reason to expect Islamic terrorism would cease by merely ending the war in Afghanistan or Iraq.Kmar wrote:
Right, and Muslims want Westerners out of the ME.. so they aren't religiously motivated as well. Selective logic you have here.lowing wrote:
So? He wants that ideology out of Norway. Hitler wanted the Jews out as well, don't recall anyone describing his efforts as a religiously motivated holy war.
inane little opines
I don't rant about Muslims, I rant about the actions taken in the name of Islam.Dilbert_X wrote:
So why are you always ranting about Muslims then lowing? Are Mexicans not the bigger problem for you?lowing wrote:
I think I read where he was bitching about all immigration but ESPECIALLY Muslims.Lets assume he's an anti-muslim fruitcake motivated by some warped view of Christianity since thats what the evidence so far suggests.I can only assume that is because there is a greater stampede of Muslims into Norway than say, Mexicans.
Or we can assume stuff based on guesses pulled out of your head.
There is nothing to suggest that. He is a proud Norwegian that sees his country as being over taken by an outside influence, ( which it probably is) and he is fighting back. That is a political motivation. The fact that he might be religious does not mean his action was.
Fine, then if AQ attacks are political, then they really need to stop doing it in the name of Allah and Islam and Muhammad. I got no problem with that. I say their efforts are Islamic based, because that is what THEY say it is. I didn't simply make it up.Shocking wrote:
Those events did not just suddenly happen. There's a whole history leading up to them; the muslim extremists didn't just pick us to bomb because "allah said so".lowing wrote:
Nope that is a good point actually. Except when 911 happened we were not in the ME., nor were we there when Pan Am blew up over Scotland, small details you missed for that argument. Also there is no reason to expect Islamic terrorism would cease by merely ending the war in Afghanistan or Iraq.Kmar wrote:
Right, and Muslims want Westerners out of the ME.. so they aren't religiously motivated as well. Selective logic you have here.
It's boring here at work and I've done all the reading I care to for the moment about sound cards and the like.Macbeth wrote:
You seem excited.Jaekus wrote:
This thread is brilliant. We can always use this as proof once and for all that lowing is a one-eyed hater of Islam and nothing more
Hence I wrote this a few pages back;lowing wrote:
Fine, then if AQ attacks are political, then they really need to stop doing it in the name of Allah and Islam and Muhammad. I got no problem with that. I say their efforts are Islamic based, because that is what THEY say it is. I didn't simply make it up.Shocking wrote:
Those events did not just suddenly happen. There's a whole history leading up to them; the muslim extremists didn't just pick us to bomb because "allah said so".lowing wrote:
Nope that is a good point actually. Except when 911 happened we were not in the ME., nor were we there when Pan Am blew up over Scotland, small details you missed for that argument. Also there is no reason to expect Islamic terrorism would cease by merely ending the war in Afghanistan or Iraq.
the fact that Muslim terrorists like to shout Allah Akbar doesn't mean their primary motivation to fight the western powers is faith. They have a grudge against the western societies and truly hate it for many reasons, not all of them unjustified. As I told you before 'faith' is a background issue. A tool used to influence and indoctrinate. As it has always been. The religious leaders within these terror groups simply project their own hatred unto their deity.. "I hate the west" becomes "Allah hates the west", I reckon it's a powerful recruiting tool in a society where religion is still very, very relevant.
inane little opines
Look up the life story of Baibars. It's interesting.Jaekus wrote:
It's boring here at work and I've done all the reading I care to for the moment about sound cards and the like.Macbeth wrote:
You seem excited.Jaekus wrote:
This thread is brilliant. We can always use this as proof once and for all that lowing is a one-eyed hater of Islam and nothing more
It goes beyond them shouting allah akbar though, they have financial backing and support from Islamic leaders. Get back with me when the Pope, or even a priest signs on to what this Norwegian did.Shocking wrote:
Hence I wrote this a few pages back;lowing wrote:
Fine, then if AQ attacks are political, then they really need to stop doing it in the name of Allah and Islam and Muhammad. I got no problem with that. I say their efforts are Islamic based, because that is what THEY say it is. I didn't simply make it up.Shocking wrote:
Those events did not just suddenly happen. There's a whole history leading up to them; the muslim extremists didn't just pick us to bomb because "allah said so".the fact that Muslim terrorists like to shout Allah Akbar doesn't mean their primary motivation to fight the western powers is faith. They have a grudge against the western societies and truly hate it for many reasons, not all of them unjustified. As I told you before 'faith' is a background issue. A tool used to influence and indoctrinate. As it has always been. The religious leaders within these terror groups simply project their own hatred unto their deity.. "I hate the west" becomes "Allah hates the west", I reckon it's a powerful recruiting tool in a society where religion is still very, very relevant.