how come no joaquin votes so far?
Last edited by superfly_cox (2006-05-17 00:37:39)
Pages: 1 2
Last edited by superfly_cox (2006-05-17 00:37:39)
haha yeah i am a dirty hun!BellusEndus wrote:
you're only sayin gazza cos you're a dirty hun fan
Last edited by theDude5B (2006-05-18 01:35:55)
u brits are sooo biased...how can you put lampard and gerard above henry? and i don't even like the french!!!!!!!elite wrote:
1.rooney
2.frank lampard
3.gerrard
4.ronaldinio
5. i dunno lol
Australia gets Brazil.... Wanna trade?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
You guys are lucky, all you have is Argentina. US has Italy and Czech, probably one of if not the toughest group.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2006-05-17 13:06:20)
Group B - England, SwedenKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Yeah, Argy is good, do have a good chance to win. BUT thats all you have. Ivory Coast, please. It seems like the US is in the only group with more than one strong team. Oh well, more legitimacy towards the US program internationally maybe?
Last edited by mikkel (2006-05-18 01:19:41)
i would have thought that the amount of money the US has that they would invest a lot into soccer. i mean they could be the best in the world if they wanted to because they have soooo many people. i am sure that there are meny talented soccer players in the US but are not incouraged to play while at school because of all the other BIG US sports.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Yeah, US is still far away internationally in terms of "football" We are getting better though. You guys have a good team, it will be interesting to see. On a side note, please no telling who wins Champions League final, I am at work and am TIVOing it as we speak. It will be hard to not look on the internet for the scores, but I must tell myself to.
Pages: 1 2