lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

As an immediate off the top of my head example. A farmer was robbed multiple times and the police were next to useless. The next time he was robbed he shot (killing) one of the robbers while another escaped. The farmer was then sentenced to prison for murder. He did commit murder, but hes not exactly a danger to society.

I know of somebody who has a 2 year prison sentence for committing an £800 fraud when he was earning over 150k a year. Obviously he argues it was an accounting error rather than deliberate. However he will be spending those 2 years mixing with all the typical criminals such as your ABH / GBH, murderers, sex criminals, perhaps more serious fraudsters.

Contrastingly a cyclist shouted at somebody to move out of the way or he'd run them over, they didn't move, he hit and killed them receiving a £2,000 fine. That doesn't feel like justice to me.

Other crimes that warrant prison time:

Graffiti
Prostitution
Drug possession
Dangerous driving

Graffiti is an interesting one as it could arguably be the start of a slippery slope OR it could be "grown out of" and just something a normal member of society looks back on as something stupid they did when they were younger.

Prostitution, again as I said sometimes good people are driven to do bad things. Yes its a crime but it easy to imagine a situation where somebody feels they have no other option. I am not saying it is all societies fault but im sure you can agree that given the choice many people would not be involved in prostitution.

Drug possession, well you have already agreed this needs reform.

Dangerous driving, another example of good people doing bad / stupid things. A rather famous example went around the internet community a couple of years back where somebody failed to properly read the road conditions and ended up half spinning in the road, at just the wrong time a motorcyclist came in the other direction around the blind corner and straight into the side of the spun car receiving multiple serious injuries. The car driver received a lengthy jail sentence, understandably due to the injuries to the motorcyclist. However, I wouldn't go so far as to say that the car driver required a stay in the prison hell you would like to create to appreciate the error of his ways and would argue that it would have little positive effect. Half spinning is a situation I would estimate that the vast majority (if not all) car drivers have or will experience at least once throughout their driving career unfortunately on this occasion a motorcyclist was in the wrong place at the wrong time but in any other instance the accident would have gone completely unpunished. Im not sure on the correct answer but it is perhaps food for thought.

While few of these crimes are victimless none of these perpetrators had intent to cause harm / personal injury with the exception of graffiti property damage.

I have not once tried to remove blame from the criminals, I did not suggest it was their teachers fault or anything else. I am staggered that you continue to deny that exposure to prison increases the likelihood of re offending.

You yourself stated that you are trying to set an example to your children by showing them not to get involved with the wrong crowd, yet you continue to deny that lumping people in with the wrong crowd can have any impact upon their future choices.

EDIT:

Reconviction rates for children leaving prison are high. Of 14-16 year olds released in 1997, 84% were reconvicted within two years, with 6 out of 10 going back to prison.
http://www.rethinking.org.uk/facts/reth … ldren.html

Thats almost the same failure rate as you are slating rehab for. So by your own argument it is a complete waste of time and money.
You are citing examples that pertain to the legal system. I am talking about the prison system. It is no big secret there are many examples of what  I think should be legal.

Still disagree, people repeat because of their decision to repeat, not because society made them and the fact that they were probably an asshole to begin with.
Cheeky_Ninja06
Member
+52|6973|Cambridge, England
So we are talking about the prison system, more specifically the problems of overcrowding and re offending. Yet we are ignoring how people end up in prison in the first place?

You asked in your previous post which crimes I did not think should be blanket punishable with prison sentences. I answered with multiple examples and you chose to completely disregard them all.

The legal, judicial and prison systems are all significantly interlinked I thought that was quite obvious?

So you continue to disagree that people are influenced by their peers?

What about the 84% failure rate of prison for 14-16 year olds? Why are you happy to spend £37,500 per inmate on free accommodation and meals for the rest of their lives?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

So we are talking about the prison system, more specifically the problems of overcrowding and re offending. Yet we are ignoring how people end up in prison in the first place?

You asked in your previous post which crimes I did not think should be blanket punishable with prison sentences. I answered with multiple examples and you chose to completely disregard them all.

The legal, judicial and prison systems are all significantly interlinked I thought that was quite obvious?

So you continue to disagree that people are influenced by their peers?

What about the 84% failure rate of prison for 14-16 year olds? Why are you happy to spend £37,500 per inmate on free accommodation and meals for the rest of their lives?
Already gave my opinion for over crowding, execute the capital offenders and legalize self induced destruction, and make prison punishment and fuck rehab at the tax payer expense since stats show rehab is largely bullshit anyway.

I addressed it, with agreeing with you, certain crimes should not be crimes.

Nope, you leave the legal system for the prison system. The process of judging you is not the same process of punishing you.


Yup I disagree. What I will agree with is people CAN b e influenced by their peers, and if you are so weak as to succumb to destructive, negative influence, then you STILL re the one to make that choice aren't you?

What is it you want me to say? Prison costs money, so does failed rehab. I choose greater punishment over coddling for people that commit crimes.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5419|Sydney
You won't get it, lulz.
Cheeky_Ninja06
Member
+52|6973|Cambridge, England

lowing wrote:

Already gave my opinion for over crowding, execute the capital offenders and legalize self induced destruction, and make prison punishment and fuck rehab at the tax payer expense since stats show rehab is largely bullshit anyway.

I addressed it, with agreeing with you, certain crimes should not be crimes.

Nope, you leave the legal system for the prison system. The process of judging you is not the same process of punishing you.


Yup I disagree. What I will agree with is people CAN b e influenced by their peers, and if you are so weak as to succumb to destructive, negative influence, then you STILL re the one to make that choice aren't you?

What is it you want me to say? Prison costs money, so does failed rehab. I choose greater punishment over coddling for people that commit crimes.
Prison isnt working. The stats are no better than for "failed rehab."

Ironically your argument for prison is a remarkably similar stance to those who oppose drug legalisation. They argue that if the war on drugs is failing then what we need is harsher punishments to act as a deterrent. They argue that "softening" the punishments is only going to increase drug use and that legalising it will make a huge drug usage boom. Similarly the prison system isnt working so what we should do is make it a worse place to be and then make sentences harsher this will work as a deterrent and reduce crime by making people scared of jail. Its unthinkable that crime could be prevented by rethinking our approach, you cant hand out lighter punishments as there will be a huge crime boom.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Already gave my opinion for over crowding, execute the capital offenders and legalize self induced destruction, and make prison punishment and fuck rehab at the tax payer expense since stats show rehab is largely bullshit anyway.

I addressed it, with agreeing with you, certain crimes should not be crimes.

Nope, you leave the legal system for the prison system. The process of judging you is not the same process of punishing you.


Yup I disagree. What I will agree with is people CAN b e influenced by their peers, and if you are so weak as to succumb to destructive, negative influence, then you STILL re the one to make that choice aren't you?

What is it you want me to say? Prison costs money, so does failed rehab. I choose greater punishment over coddling for people that commit crimes.
Prison isnt working. The stats are no better than for "failed rehab."

Ironically your argument for prison is a remarkably similar stance to those who oppose drug legalisation. They argue that if the war on drugs is failing then what we need is harsher punishments to act as a deterrent. They argue that "softening" the punishments is only going to increase drug use and that legalising it will make a huge drug usage boom. Similarly the prison system isnt working so what we should do is make it a worse place to be and then make sentences harsher this will work as a deterrent and reduce crime by making people scared of jail. Its unthinkable that crime could be prevented by rethinking our approach, you cant hand out lighter punishments as there will be a huge crime boom.
Let me ask you a question...Is the only thing keeping you from turn into a meth head is the fact that it is illegal? No? Then why do you think everyone else is waiting for it to turn legal so they can become meth heads? Arguing that legalizing drugs has no precedence to it. When prohibition was repealed the country didn't all turn into alcoholics, why do you assume we will all turn into crack heads?

Let me see if I can't be a little more obvious here. I do not care what happens to prisoners in prison.

It is not supposed to be a place where you have a say, or a place where you should be comfortable. If you do not like the treatment, don't do anything to get sent there. Staying out of prison really isn't all that difficult in life, and if you can't seem to make it through life without going there, well then, you probably deserve to be there. Rehab does not work, that is a fact. If you get out of prison and CHOOSE to do shit that sends you back, fuck you and back you go. Society should not coddle these assholes, society should punish them and again if the first time wasn't enough.

Last edited by lowing (2011-07-13 09:25:23)

Cheeky_Ninja06
Member
+52|6973|Cambridge, England
Perhaps I should be more plain then.

If there is a way to stop or at least reduce the chances re offending then it should be pursued. I'm not particularly fussed what the method is but anything that is more successful then prison should be encouraged.

I am more interested in reducing future crime than getting revenge on criminals.

Same question to you, is the only thing that stops you from being a serial killer the fact that it is illegal?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

Perhaps I should be more plain then.

If there is a way to stop or at least reduce the chances re offending then it should be pursued. I'm not particularly fussed what the method is but anything that is more successful then prison should be encouraged.

I am more interested in reducing future crime than getting revenge on criminals.

Same question to you, is the only thing that stops you from being a serial killer the fact that it is illegal?
Fine, but rehab isn't the route to take. Rehab is used by prisoners to get out of prison, to improve their current situation for the time being, NOT because they are looking to heal.

I am interested in "revenge". As I said, NOT being a felon in our country isn't exactly a challenge, and if you can't seem to stay out of trouble when the vast majority of everyone else can, then the problem is YOU and not society.

Nope what keeps me from being a serial killer is, I have no desire to kill anyone for any reason, which has nothing to do with the law. It has everything to do with conscience and morality and a sense of right or wrong.

You didn't answer my question, you claim the world is going to run wild with crack heads if it became legal. Are you waiting for legalization of crack so you can become a crack head or would you still not do it?

Last edited by lowing (2011-07-13 10:36:01)

Cheeky_Ninja06
Member
+52|6973|Cambridge, England

lowing wrote:

Fine, but rehab isn't the route to take. Rehab is used by prisoners to get out of prison, to improve their current situation for the time being, NOT because they are looking to heal.

I am interested "revenge". As I said, NOT being a felon in our country isn't exactly a challenge, and if you can't seem to stay out of trouble when the vast majority of everyone else can, then the problem is YOU and not society.

Nope what keeps me from being a serial killer is, I have no desire to kill anyone for any reason, which has nothing to do with the law. It has everything to do with conscience and morality and a sense of right or wrong.

You didn't answer my question, you claim the world is going to run wild with crack heads if it became legal. Are you waiting for legalization of crack so you can become a crack head or would you still not do it?
I never suggested rehab in any of my posts. I just disagreed with your assessment of it being comprehensively dismissed.

It doesn't matter whose fault it is, if something can be done to reduce the chances of repeat offenders then who is better off?? All of the potential victims clearly.

Right so whether or not you are a serial killer has nothing to do with what sentence you will receive for doing it. Therefore how does prison work as a deterrent when offenders do not even consider it when committing their "felonies"?

I did not claim the world will run wild with crack heads if it became legal. All drugs will eventually become legal. I was comparing your argument re prison sentences with the argument made against drug legalisation (in which you hold the opposite opinion), trying to demonstrate the inconsistency in your argument.

I would not do it whether it is legal or not which is exactly my point. Criminals do not care about prison, they don't even consider it. Therefore increasing prison sentences / making prison unpleasant is going to have little effect on crime rates. Prison is an answer yes, but it is not the right answer.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Fine, but rehab isn't the route to take. Rehab is used by prisoners to get out of prison, to improve their current situation for the time being, NOT because they are looking to heal.

I am interested "revenge". As I said, NOT being a felon in our country isn't exactly a challenge, and if you can't seem to stay out of trouble when the vast majority of everyone else can, then the problem is YOU and not society.

Nope what keeps me from being a serial killer is, I have no desire to kill anyone for any reason, which has nothing to do with the law. It has everything to do with conscience and morality and a sense of right or wrong.

You didn't answer my question, you claim the world is going to run wild with crack heads if it became legal. Are you waiting for legalization of crack so you can become a crack head or would you still not do it?
I never suggested rehab in any of my posts. I just disagreed with your assessment of it being comprehensively dismissed.

It doesn't matter whose fault it is, if something can be done to reduce the chances of repeat offenders then who is better off?? All of the potential victims clearly.

Right so whether or not you are a serial killer has nothing to do with what sentence you will receive for doing it. Therefore how does prison work as a deterrent when offenders do not even consider it when committing their "felonies"?

I did not claim the world will run wild with crack heads if it became legal. All drugs will eventually become legal. I was comparing your argument re prison sentences with the argument made against drug legalisation (in which you hold the opposite opinion), trying to demonstrate the inconsistency in your argument.

I would not do it whether it is legal or not which is exactly my point. Criminals do not care about prison, they don't even consider it. Therefore increasing prison sentences / making prison unpleasant is going to have little effect on crime rates. Prison is an answer yes, but it is not the right answer.
and I do, if a person really wants help, they will seek it out long before their choice of rehab or prison. If it gets to that choice you should go to prison.

Wrong, it does matter whose fault it is, because if a person rapes someone, it clearly is not MY fault. There is nothing that can be done. THat is why assholes like rapists, or serial killers need to be removed from society. Removing their sorry asses from society pretty much reduces repeat offending doesn't it?

I don't care, the punishment should guarantee a zero possibility of repeat offenses.

You lost me with this one.
Cheeky_Ninja06
Member
+52|6973|Cambridge, England
I think I lose you with every post I make.
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6808|Mountains of NC

1st offence you lose a pinky, 2nd offence you lose a thumb, 3rd goes your hand
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

I think I lose you with every post I make.
Yup ya do, you want to tell me prison doesn't work, and when I point out rehab doesn't  work,  you want to fight me, but insist you never said rehab was the answer. You want to constantly bitch about the problem, bitch about solutions others have suggested, but refuse to take a stand on what you think the answer is.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5419|Sydney

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

I think I lose you with every post I make.
Yeah that's lowing for you dude. The more you explain the more he lacks understanding.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Already gave my opinion for over crowding, execute the capital offenders and legalize self induced destruction, and make prison punishment and fuck rehab at the tax payer expense since stats show rehab is largely bullshit anyway.

I addressed it, with agreeing with you, certain crimes should not be crimes.

Nope, you leave the legal system for the prison system. The process of judging you is not the same process of punishing you.


Yup I disagree. What I will agree with is people CAN b e influenced by their peers, and if you are so weak as to succumb to destructive, negative influence, then you STILL re the one to make that choice aren't you?

What is it you want me to say? Prison costs money, so does failed rehab. I choose greater punishment over coddling for people that commit crimes.
Prison isnt working. The stats are no better than for "failed rehab."

Ironically your argument for prison is a remarkably similar stance to those who oppose drug legalisation. They argue that if the war on drugs is failing then what we need is harsher punishments to act as a deterrent. They argue that "softening" the punishments is only going to increase drug use and that legalising it will make a huge drug usage boom. Similarly the prison system isnt working so what we should do is make it a worse place to be and then make sentences harsher this will work as a deterrent and reduce crime by making people scared of jail. Its unthinkable that crime could be prevented by rethinking our approach, you cant hand out lighter punishments as there will be a huge crime boom.
YOu are really mis-understanding here. I am not looking to solve anyones problem with prison, I am looking to punish THE FUCK out those that victimize someone else and couldn't care less what happens to them while they are away. If they get out and continue, then I am all for fucking them up again. Rehab is up to them NOT up to me. Legalizing drugs is not going to open the flood gates for drug abuse any more than those already taking them.

Last edited by lowing (2011-07-13 18:47:44)

13rin
Member
+977|6719
5 days 6 hours ago... I'd be hungry... Anyone die/give up yet?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

13rin wrote:

5 days 6 hours ago... I'd be hungry... Anyone die/give up yet?
i dunno, i sure hope not
13rin
Member
+977|6719

lowing wrote:

13rin wrote:

5 days 6 hours ago... I'd be hungry... Anyone die/give up yet?
i dunno, i sure hope not
me either.




















































hahahahaha... kidding.. I hope they're all dead.  I'm serious.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5826

lol
Cheeky_Ninja06
Member
+52|6973|Cambridge, England

lowing wrote:

YOu are really mis-understanding here. I am not looking to solve anyones problem with prison, I am looking to punish THE FUCK out those that victimize someone else and couldn't care less what happens to them while they are away. If they get out and continue, then I am all for fucking them up again. Rehab is up to them NOT up to me. Legalizing drugs is not going to open the flood gates for drug abuse any more than those already taking them.
So you dont care if your "punishing the fuck" out of criminals for one offence directly leads to them committing further offences and thus more people becoming victims?

It doesn't matter what the cost to society is as long as you get to treat somebody like shit to make you feel better?

If they come back to prison and you "fuck them" again that means you have failed. That means that there are additional victims. Sure great you get to lock the door after the horse has bolted but I thought the whole point of prison was to reduce crime, not to make YOU feel good.

Reducing crime is more important than punishment. Hypothetically you throw somebody in jail for a fairly minor offence and they then "choose" to continue a life of crime making the most of the contacts they have made in jail and are constantly in and out of prison for gradually increasing severities of crime. Or you can go completely to the extreme, lets say you give him a slap on the wrist and a suspended sentence, perhaps even compensation / a fine so the victims feel repaid. The criminal then fails to make a load of new criminal friends to help his future life of crime and conceivably moves on from his minor crime without re offending.

In the first situation you have got your way and there is lots of opportunity for punishing people.

In the second situation I have got my way and there is only 1 victim not a whole lifetime of victims.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5419|Sydney
Anyone who thought prison was about "revenge" should really just move to a third world country.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6346|eXtreme to the maX
But don't you enjoy settling into your armchair knowing that someone somewhere is getting buttraped and will come out of prison more likely to commit a crime than when they went in?

We've had this, and many other debates, a few times before. My objective is to reduce crime, not enjoy exacting revenge on a crime which need never have happened in the first place if the system were just a bit smarter.
Fuck Israel
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

lowing wrote:

YOu are really mis-understanding here. I am not looking to solve anyones problem with prison, I am looking to punish THE FUCK out those that victimize someone else and couldn't care less what happens to them while they are away. If they get out and continue, then I am all for fucking them up again. Rehab is up to them NOT up to me. Legalizing drugs is not going to open the flood gates for drug abuse any more than those already taking them.
So you dont care if your "punishing the fuck" out of criminals for one offence directly leads to them committing further offences and thus more people becoming victims?

It doesn't matter what the cost to society is as long as you get to treat somebody like shit to make you feel better?

If they come back to prison and you "fuck them" again that means you have failed. That means that there are additional victims. Sure great you get to lock the door after the horse has bolted but I thought the whole point of prison was to reduce crime, not to make YOU feel good.

Reducing crime is more important than punishment. Hypothetically you throw somebody in jail for a fairly minor offence and they then "choose" to continue a life of crime making the most of the contacts they have made in jail and are constantly in and out of prison for gradually increasing severities of crime. Or you can go completely to the extreme, lets say you give him a slap on the wrist and a suspended sentence, perhaps even compensation / a fine so the victims feel repaid. The criminal then fails to make a load of new criminal friends to help his future life of crime and conceivably moves on from his minor crime without re offending.

In the first situation you have got your way and there is lots of opportunity for punishing people.

In the second situation I have got my way and there is only 1 victim not a whole lifetime of victims.
Brother, not you , me, society, prison, rehab etc. is going to control anyone from doing anything they want to do. You say prison doesn't work, and it has been shown rehab doesn't work either, so if the only solution is to remove them from society so be it. You can not force change on a person, only that person can do it.

Not sure where you are getting this " so it makes me feel good" bullshit.  This is not about ME, you wanna bitch that prison is over crowded and the system does not work. My solution is to simply fuck the criminals, and not society.


Wrong, if they go back to prison and the get fucked again it means THEY have failed yet again. Your insistence that I or anyone else is responsible for the behavior of a criminal is not going to be accepted by me. I am responsible for MY life and my life only. Living the US is not a hard thing to do, staying out of trouble is also not all that difficult. When the vast majority of people can go through life without victimizing another, and YOU can't seem to stay out of trouble, YOU are the problem, stop blaming society. Again with this "making me feel good" non-sense, where are you getting that?


Already agreed with you, self destruction should be legal, I applaud a drug abusers freedom to die in a ditch choking on his own vomit. What more do you want me to say about it?


Well if the prison system was working like it should, he wouldn't be "making friends, and establishing criminal contacts" in prison. Part of that problem is, it appears the prisoners run the prison far more than the guards do. THe prisoners lift weights, do drugs in prison, make weapons, establish gangs, run outside operations from inside the prison. All of this is bullshit. Taking control is what I am talking about, and if there is any sign at all that a person might be a danger to society, then they can sit in prison. There will be plenty of room because you would have legalized self destruction, AND executed prisoners for capital offenses. PLUS making rape, child molestation etc. a capital offense would thin the heard out even more.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Jaekus wrote:

Anyone who thought prison was about "revenge" should really just move to a third world country.
Nope, I think prison is about the victims and justice. Not about coddling criminals with hugs and kumbaya.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6891|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:

But don't you enjoy settling into your armchair knowing that someone somewhere is getting buttraped and will come out of prison more likely to commit a crime than when they went in?

We've had this, and many other debates, a few times before. My objective is to reduce crime, not enjoy exacting revenge on a crime which need never have happened in the first place if the system were just a bit smarter.
I don't care if they are getting but raped, and if they stand a greater chance of committing further crimes then they shouldn't be released at all.


Right, a society without criminals, name one. Get real dilbert, there is not solution to stopping people from doing what they really want to do. THere is no magical society where there are no victims. All there is punishment for when they do it. a

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard