So you specifically hate gay retarded "inner city" folk..:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
i hate special rights, i hate gay rights, and i hate crime.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
So you specifically hate gay retarded "inner city" folk..:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
i hate special rights, i hate gay rights, and i hate crime.
Why is disagreeing with homosexuality always branded homophobia? Seems like an attempt to stifle debate more than an accurate description.Uzique wrote:
2 anti-homo threads from lowing in one page... 2 flat failures... i see a trend in homophobia
ctrl c/v??Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Personally, I think all forms of homoness are vile. I know it's trendy to think two chicks diddling each other is hot, but gay is gay. Britney and madonna tongue kissing was gross.
The homosexual lobby would have you believe that fags are normal and should be allowed equal rights, which is okay to a point; I care not about civil unions and equal rights as far as benefits for long term partners. But, it is a deviant lifestyle that is best left out of sight of the general public.
I don't want my kids seeing it.
Fags should do us all a favor and go live on their own private isle. Call it Queerland and let them fuck themselves out of existence.
Well, for me anyway, the debate is not over homosexuality. There is nothing to debate, it is none of anyone's business except theirs.Stingray24 wrote:
Why is disagreeing with homosexuality always branded homophobia? Seems like an attempt to stifle debate more than an accurate description.Uzique wrote:
2 anti-homo threads from lowing in one page... 2 flat failures... i see a trend in homophobia
Actually jaekus, I was referring to their insistence that they stand out in history books for events that have nothing to do with their being gay.Jaekus wrote:
LOL
They aren't insisting on standing apart.
They just want to marry their partner, like any heterosexual couple.
Oh yeah, forgot, blinders are always on aren't they?
Ya see Jaekus, I was addressing what stingray said, kinda why I quoted him. He was not specifically talking aobut gay marriage, he was talking about gays in general, and the attitudes surrounding them.Jaekus wrote:
Your other anti-gay thread is that way --->
Well since we were talking about "gay marriage" law, and in the other thread a law that passed insisting we teach gay contributions in history, then I suppose we are not talking about YOUR gay friends then are we? Unless YOUR gay friends, speak for the entire world wide gay community?Jaekus wrote:
How many gay people do you honestly know?
The ones I know do not want special recognition. Not one.
What do you take as a "no"?Jaekus wrote:
I'll take that as a "no" then.
And I'm not surprised at all.