you dyed your hair pink put it in a mohawk? damn
inane little opines
urdoinitrongAussieReaper wrote:
That was the joke.FEOS wrote:
fixtAussieReaper wrote:
Where is your problem Camm?Camm wrote:
I have absolutely no problem with gay people, my flat-mate is bisexual, and one of my good friends is gay.
What I have a problem with is shoving this crap in kid's faces. What grade/age group is this stuff being directed at?
If you read anything about the struggle for gays to have equal rights, I'm sure you'd find it faaaaaaabulous.
IndeedShocking wrote:
you dyed your hair pink put it in a mohawk? damn
You're saying that to avoid abuse they should change who they are. If you have to change who you are to avoid abuse, can you see that that is due to discrimination?Jay wrote:
No child, you completely missed my point. I said that the only thing separating gay people from the rest of society is who they choose to spend their nights with. The way they talk, the way they dress, it is their way of voluntarily separating themselves from the rest of society. I'm not saying they need to conform, I'm saying that they easily can do so in a mixed setting in order to avoid abuse. Black people, Mexicans etc can't change the color of their skin and blend in.
Lastly, no, I don't want to dictate how people dress and act on the street. I was the kid in the mohawk getting taunted as I walked down the street. But, I understood that it was voluntary on my part to look like that. It's human nature to automatically hate what is new and different. It's a self defense mechanism. Wariness.
Last remaining discriminated classes... man you sure got gyped with your cause didn't you? You're already 99% of the way complete. I guess it's an easy sense of accomplishment to earn though. Fight the good fight though. I'm sure the people of this state really cared that an Aussie was cheering them on from the other side of the globe.
People that look or act different than the majority will always be persecuted to one degree or another. It's just human nature. I'm just saying that in the case of gay people, it's voluntary. I've known a number of gay people that talked and dressed 'normal'. It didn't make them any less gay, you just couldn't really tell by looking at them. It was their choice to blend in, just as it is others' choice to stand out.AussieReaper wrote:
You're saying that to avoid abuse they should change who they are. If you have to change who you are to avoid abuse, can you see that that is due to discrimination?Jay wrote:
No child, you completely missed my point. I said that the only thing separating gay people from the rest of society is who they choose to spend their nights with. The way they talk, the way they dress, it is their way of voluntarily separating themselves from the rest of society. I'm not saying they need to conform, I'm saying that they easily can do so in a mixed setting in order to avoid abuse. Black people, Mexicans etc can't change the color of their skin and blend in.
Lastly, no, I don't want to dictate how people dress and act on the street. I was the kid in the mohawk getting taunted as I walked down the street. But, I understood that it was voluntary on my part to look like that. It's human nature to automatically hate what is new and different. It's a self defense mechanism. Wariness.
Last remaining discriminated classes... man you sure got gyped with your cause didn't you? You're already 99% of the way complete. I guess it's an easy sense of accomplishment to earn though. Fight the good fight though. I'm sure the people of this state really cared that an Aussie was cheering them on from the other side of the globe.
But you had a mohawk so obviously must know what they have had to go through. Clap, clap.
Yeah to be honest the camp act shits off other non-camp gay people sometimes. I've known two gay men in my life who both said they can't stand it.Jay wrote:
People that look or act different than the majority will always be persecuted to one degree or another. It's just human nature. I'm just saying that in the case of gay people, it's voluntary. I've known a number of gay people that talked and dressed 'normal'. It didn't make them any less gay, you just couldn't really tell by looking at them. It was their choice to blend in, just as it is others' choice to stand out.AussieReaper wrote:
You're saying that to avoid abuse they should change who they are. If you have to change who you are to avoid abuse, can you see that that is due to discrimination?Jay wrote:
No child, you completely missed my point. I said that the only thing separating gay people from the rest of society is who they choose to spend their nights with. The way they talk, the way they dress, it is their way of voluntarily separating themselves from the rest of society. I'm not saying they need to conform, I'm saying that they easily can do so in a mixed setting in order to avoid abuse. Black people, Mexicans etc can't change the color of their skin and blend in.
Lastly, no, I don't want to dictate how people dress and act on the street. I was the kid in the mohawk getting taunted as I walked down the street. But, I understood that it was voluntary on my part to look like that. It's human nature to automatically hate what is new and different. It's a self defense mechanism. Wariness.
Last remaining discriminated classes... man you sure got gyped with your cause didn't you? You're already 99% of the way complete. I guess it's an easy sense of accomplishment to earn though. Fight the good fight though. I'm sure the people of this state really cared that an Aussie was cheering them on from the other side of the globe.
But you had a mohawk so obviously must know what they have had to go through. Clap, clap.
I have too. Straight people look at the ridiculous gay pride parades and assume all gay people are like that. It makes calls for full integration exponentially more difficult. Gays in the military? The ignorant can just point and ask "do we want that behavior in our military?". The minority is fucking it up for the majority, just like the minority of system abusing immigrants provoke calls for kicking out all immigrants. Fair? No. But it's reality.Jaekus wrote:
Yeah to be honest the camp act shits off other non-camp gay people sometimes. I've known two gay men in my life who both said they can't stand it.Jay wrote:
People that look or act different than the majority will always be persecuted to one degree or another. It's just human nature. I'm just saying that in the case of gay people, it's voluntary. I've known a number of gay people that talked and dressed 'normal'. It didn't make them any less gay, you just couldn't really tell by looking at them. It was their choice to blend in, just as it is others' choice to stand out.AussieReaper wrote:
You're saying that to avoid abuse they should change who they are. If you have to change who you are to avoid abuse, can you see that that is due to discrimination?
But you had a mohawk so obviously must know what they have had to go through. Clap, clap.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-07-06 05:48:09)
Last edited by Jay (2011-07-06 05:51:11)
I think you've missed my point.Dilbert_X wrote:
A business meeting is a formal environment with rules of etiquette and so on.
How people act in their leisure time is up to them.
I agree to a certain extent, but I'm realistic enough to understand that the vast majority are naturally conservative and that there will always be friction. Fighting human nature is like pushing water uphill.Dilbert_X wrote:
Not really, some environments have strict rules of behaviour, some don't.
If you're bothered with how someone is acting in a non-formal envirnment its your problem.
this.Jaekus wrote:
Yeah true. But making it compulsory means little will change. They already teach history involving gay people. All they'd have to do is an assignment here or there focussing on someone who was gay. Meh.
Last edited by lowing (2011-07-06 07:08:57)
Last edited by War Man (2011-07-06 07:03:55)
By whom?War Man wrote:
I'm white and I feel we are being oppressed, currently. Where is "White History"?
the law doesnt recognize gays as a classAussieReaper wrote:
It is a class of people. Why do you think they were denied the right to marry? That was based on the classification of gay.lowing wrote:
Gay is not a class of people. It is not a race and being gay has nothing to do with their accomplishments in history. Bullshit like this is the same thing as teaching the "fat people history" Highlighting the accomplishments of fat people, when their weight has nothing to do with their accomplishments of finding a cure for polio or inventing the light bulb.
Secondly, the have accomplishments when you look at the challenge for equal rights. Same as the struggle for equal rights for blacks. And before that, for women.
You're really on a roll lately with ignorant posts.