sorry that is yet another opinion and not a fact regarding the OPJaekus wrote:
lowing wrote:
Actually there has been 10 pages of opinion, there is nothing to show where current laws discriminate against anyone.Jaekus wrote:
It's been outlined time and time again by a number of different posters in a variety of ways. There are TEN PAGES showing you how you are wrong.
And you still don't get it.
You are the densest person I've ever encountered.Jaekus wrote:
Ferrous Cranus is utterly impervious to reason, persuasion and new ideas, and when engaged in battle he will not yield an inch in his position regardless of its hopelessness. Though his thrusts are decisively repulsed, his arguments crushed in every detail and his defenses demolished beyond repair he will remount the same attack again and again with only the slightest variation in tactics. Sometimes out of pure frustration Philosopher will try to explain to him the failed logistics of his situation, or Therapist will attempt to penetrate the psychological origins of his obduracy, but, ever unfathomable, Ferrous Cranus cannot be moved.
You're in denial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA
if they still do that on people i'm sure lowing was one of the subjects.
if they still do that on people i'm sure lowing was one of the subjects.
Wow, you KNOW I do it? really? you KNOW?!! and where do you get these "facts" from? Same place you get all the others?13/f/taiwan wrote:
don't lie i know you do it.13/f/taiwan wrote:
i bet lowing goes over to the bad part of town carrying his gun looking for something to happen so he has a reason to shoot someone.
he does.
great, now all you gotta do is provide something I am in denial about regarding this OP. I'll wait.Jaekus wrote:
You're in denial.
Again, for emphasis:lowing wrote:
great, now all you gotta do is provide something I am in denial about regarding this OP. I'll wait.Jaekus wrote:
You're in denial.
Ferrous Cranus is utterly impervious to reason, persuasion and new ideas, and when engaged in battle he will not yield an inch in his position regardless of its hopelessness. Though his thrusts are decisively repulsed, his arguments crushed in every detail and his defenses demolished beyond repair he will remount the same attack again and again with only the slightest variation in tactics. Sometimes out of pure frustration Philosopher will try to explain to him the failed logistics of his situation, or Therapist will attempt to penetrate the psychological origins of his obduracy, but, ever unfathomable, Ferrous Cranus cannot be moved.
and for "emphasis", you are not addressing the OP. and your assertion that homosexuals are discriminated against by law.Jaekus wrote:
Again, for emphasis:lowing wrote:
great, now all you gotta do is provide something I am in denial about regarding this OP. I'll wait.Jaekus wrote:
You're in denial.Ferrous Cranus is utterly impervious to reason, persuasion and new ideas, and when engaged in battle he will not yield an inch in his position regardless of its hopelessness. Though his thrusts are decisively repulsed, his arguments crushed in every detail and his defenses demolished beyond repair he will remount the same attack again and again with only the slightest variation in tactics. Sometimes out of pure frustration Philosopher will try to explain to him the failed logistics of his situation, or Therapist will attempt to penetrate the psychological origins of his obduracy, but, ever unfathomable, Ferrous Cranus cannot be moved.
It's not my fault you refuse to understand, and choose to remain totally dense.
That or you're just trolling. Which one is it?
That or you're just trolling. Which one is it?
This, of course is my favorite, sorry Jaekus, you come in second place this time.lowing wrote:
Ahhh of course, don't give any specifics to your argument that I am wrong. Yes asking what you are talking about and expecting you to know, is my trap. I love it. lol13/f/taiwan wrote:
don't break down the specifics posiedon. that's his trap. just tell him he's wrong. it's like telling a kid not covering up while coughing is wrong. you're wrong lowing. get over it.
I didn't realise this was a competition.
I can not understand comments that are factually wrong in this op, and your assertion that current laws discriminate against homosexuals is wrong, unless you can show me how the laws are written specifically for gays and does not include everyone else.Jaekus wrote:
It's not my fault you refuse to understand, and choose to remain totally dense.
That or you're just trolling. Which one is it?
Oh yes, when you all start up, I keep score. I can not help all of your tantrums, but I sure as hell can enjoy them. Granted I would rather talk about stuff other than me, but hey, I can not control what guys like you post, so with a lack of a choice, I will watch the absurdity.Jaekus wrote:
I didn't realise this was a competition.
What did you think of the post where getting specific with an argument is a trap set by me? Personally, I think that is my all time favorite.
Last edited by lowing (2011-07-01 18:58:11)
Where did I make such an assertion?lowing wrote:
I can not understand comments that are factually wrong in this op, and your assertion that current laws discriminate against homosexuals is wrong, unless you can show me how the laws are written specifically for gays and does not include everyone else.Jaekus wrote:
It's not my fault you refuse to understand, and choose to remain totally dense.
That or you're just trolling. Which one is it?
Oh yeah, I didn't.
Keep being wrong, you're very good at it.
I'll keep bi-winning
That's your favourite post on here?lowing wrote:
Oh yes, when you all start up, I keep score. I can not help all of your tantrums, but I sure as hell can enjoy them. Granted I would rather talk about stuff other than me, but hey, I can not control what guys like you post, so with a lack of a choice, I will watch the absurdity.Jaekus wrote:
I didn't realise this was a competition.
What did you think of the post where getting specific with an argument is a trap set by me? Personally, I think that is my all time favorite.
You are a very sad individual if this is so.
Really? Well then, you agree homosexuals are not being discriminated against then and any laws restricting same sex marriage applies to everyone. Good, welcome aboard. However, I am pretty sure you did take a different opinion earlier in the thread.Jaekus wrote:
Where did I make such an assertion?lowing wrote:
I can not understand comments that are factually wrong in this op, and your assertion that current laws discriminate against homosexuals is wrong, unless you can show me how the laws are written specifically for gays and does not include everyone else.Jaekus wrote:
It's not my fault you refuse to understand, and choose to remain totally dense.
That or you're just trolling. Which one is it?
Oh yeah, I didn't.
Keep being wrong, you're very good at it.
I'll keep bi-winning
no no , my favorite post of a tantrum regarding me. Gotta admit, that is a good one.Jaekus wrote:
That's your favourite post on here?lowing wrote:
Oh yes, when you all start up, I keep score. I can not help all of your tantrums, but I sure as hell can enjoy them. Granted I would rather talk about stuff other than me, but hey, I can not control what guys like you post, so with a lack of a choice, I will watch the absurdity.Jaekus wrote:
I didn't realise this was a competition.
What did you think of the post where getting specific with an argument is a trap set by me? Personally, I think that is my all time favorite.
You are a very sad individual if this is so.
So by the fact I said I didn't make such an assertion you assume I am now of the same weird notion you hold?lowing wrote:
Really? Well then, you agree homosexuals are not being discriminated against then and any laws restricting same sex marriage applies to everyone. Good, welcome aboard. However, I am pretty sure you did take a different opinion earlier in the thread.Jaekus wrote:
Where did I make such an assertion?lowing wrote:
I can not understand comments that are factually wrong in this op, and your assertion that current laws discriminate against homosexuals is wrong, unless you can show me how the laws are written specifically for gays and does not include everyone else.
Oh yeah, I didn't.
Keep being wrong, you're very good at it.
I'll keep bi-winning
lulz
I was merely pointing out that despite you once again trying to put words in someone's mouth, it isn't true.
In short: keep being wrong, you're very good at it.
Gotta admit, that is pretty sad. You need to get out more.lowing wrote:
no no , my favorite post of a tantrum regarding me. Gotta admit, that is a good one.Jaekus wrote:
That's your favourite post on here?lowing wrote:
Oh yes, when you all start up, I keep score. I can not help all of your tantrums, but I sure as hell can enjoy them. Granted I would rather talk about stuff other than me, but hey, I can not control what guys like you post, so with a lack of a choice, I will watch the absurdity.
What did you think of the post where getting specific with an argument is a trap set by me? Personally, I think that is my all time favorite.
You are a very sad individual if this is so.
Last edited by Jaekus (2011-07-01 19:05:13)
Well lets nail it down then...Do you think gays are being discriminated against by not allowing same sex marriage? lets start off with a yes or no shall we? THen feel free to elaborate.Jaekus wrote:
So by the fact I said I didn't make such an assertion you assume I am now of the same weird notion you hold?lowing wrote:
Really? Well then, you agree homosexuals are not being discriminated against then and any laws restricting same sex marriage applies to everyone. Good, welcome aboard. However, I am pretty sure you did take a different opinion earlier in the thread.Jaekus wrote:
Where did I make such an assertion?
Oh yeah, I didn't.
Keep being wrong, you're very good at it.
I'll keep bi-winning
lulz
I was merely pointing out that despite you once again trying to put words in someone's mouth, it isn't true.
In short: keep being wrong, you're very good at it.
Do you think so, you mean between, my kids sports, shooting, and RC planes, as well as constantly traveling I do not get out enough? Man, any suggestions?Jaekus wrote:
Gotta admit, that is pretty sad. You need to get out more.lowing wrote:
no no , my favorite post of a tantrum regarding me. Gotta admit, that is a good one.Jaekus wrote:
That's your favourite post on here?
You are a very sad individual if this is so.
Why? You'll only get it all wrong anyway, like you usually do.lowing wrote:
Well lets nail it down then...Do you think gays are being discriminated against by not allowing same sex marriage? lets start off with a yes or no shall we? THen feel free to elaborate.Jaekus wrote:
So by the fact I said I didn't make such an assertion you assume I am now of the same weird notion you hold?lowing wrote:
Really? Well then, you agree homosexuals are not being discriminated against then and any laws restricting same sex marriage applies to everyone. Good, welcome aboard. However, I am pretty sure you did take a different opinion earlier in the thread.
lulz
I was merely pointing out that despite you once again trying to put words in someone's mouth, it isn't true.
In short: keep being wrong, you're very good at it.
Why would two straight people marry each other beyond the desire to commit fraud?lowing wrote:
IF 2 straight people wanted to get married same sex, for whatever reason, they would not be allowed to do so. So no, nobody can marry who they want. The law does not specify between gay and straight, if there is no distinction then there is no discrimination.Kmar wrote:
It's the right to marry who you want to. It's the right to be able to choose. If one section of the population is allowed to marry who they want, why shouldn't the other?lowing wrote:
Well if I am wrong, and there is a group of people that are allowed to marry same sex, and just not gays, feel free to correct me.
Being gay is a social class. It's not a choice, just like being a woman is not a choice. Should we take away the right for women to vote because not all women want to vote?
You're on much better ground when you are arguing against the government being involved at all. They are the ones who created the inequality in the first place.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Exactly.Kmar wrote:
Why would two straight people marry each other beyond the desire to commit fraud?lowing wrote:
IF 2 straight people wanted to get married same sex, for whatever reason, they would not be allowed to do so. So no, nobody can marry who they want. The law does not specify between gay and straight, if there is no distinction then there is no discrimination.Kmar wrote:
It's the right to marry who you want to. It's the right to be able to choose. If one section of the population is allowed to marry who they want, why shouldn't the other?
Being gay is a social class. It's not a choice, just like being a woman is not a choice. Should we take away the right for women to vote because not all women want to vote?
You're on much better ground when you are arguing against the government being involved at all. They are the ones who created the inequality in the first place.
Last edited by Jaekus (2011-07-02 03:53:01)
10% is quoted a lot, in reality its more like 2-3%.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
he means 90% of the pop is straight, 10% is gay (general numbers). He means that previously 90% of people could marry who they wanted, while 10% was left shit out of luck. Pretty easy to understand, read the sentence in context.
Fuck Israel