presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6220|Places 'n such
So we've established gay people can marry each other, straight people can marry each other and straight people can marry gay people.
Right, any other combinations people can think of so we can claim that homo and heterosexual people are being discriminated against?

What about a-sexuals?? WHY CANT THEY MARRY THEMSELVES? This is blatant discrimination designed to give people who want to have a partner preferential treatment!
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
13/f/taiwan
Member
+940|5957

presidentsheep wrote:

No matter how many times I try to find the point of this thread I can't.
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5518|foggy bottom
its a "look at me, im lowing" thread
Tu Stultus Es
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

i didn't read anywhere in that bill that stipulated there can only be marriage between same sexes if the people are homosexual.

what stops people from lying and pretending to be homosexual to get married?

what stops heterosexual people from getting married to the opposite sex for financial gain?

What the fuck is this thread about again?
Why would you have to lie? Now you get my point.
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6220|Places 'n such
If you're going to lie to get married for financial reasons why, again, does it matter who you're marrying? Surely it doesn't really matter if you're marrying a man, woman or cardboard cutout of buzz lightyear?
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
13/f/taiwan
Member
+940|5957
this is the first time i've seen lowing advocating for people who "cheat" the system.
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6220|Places 'n such
I think it's discriminating the amount of money spent on advertising tampons solely at women.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5437|Sydney

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Who knows. It is retarded. Why not have a thread asking if a gay person can marry someone of the opposite sex?
Because they are already allowed to marry the opposite sex, just like everyone else.
Well duh!

That's why this is called "same-sex marriage", meaning anyone can marry another person of the same gender.

Face it, this whole discussion is utterly ridiculous.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

presidentsheep wrote:

If you're going to lie to get married for financial reasons why, again, does it matter who you're marrying? Surely it doesn't really matter if you're marrying a man, woman or cardboard cutout of buzz lightyear?
I never had to declare that I was marrying for love, but you just suggested that you will have to lie about being gay to marry same sex, question is why?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Who knows. It is retarded. Why not have a thread asking if a gay person can marry someone of the opposite sex?
Because they are already allowed to marry the opposite sex, just like everyone else.
Well duh!

That's why this is called "same-sex marriage", meaning anyone can marry another person of the same gender.

Face it, this whole discussion is utterly ridiculous.
As long as anyone can marry same sex and not just homosexuals, as I said we will see.

and if you think it is ridiculous, then stop posting in it.

Last edited by lowing (2011-06-26 16:23:40)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

13/f/taiwan wrote:

this is the first time i've seen lowing advocating for people who "cheat" the system.
What system am I advocating cheating? It is not the govts. business why anyone would get married.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5437|Sydney

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:


Because they are already allowed to marry the opposite sex, just like everyone else.
Well duh!

That's why this is called "same-sex marriage", meaning anyone can marry another person of the same gender.

Face it, this whole discussion is utterly ridiculous.
As long as anyone can marry same sex and not just homosexuals, as I said we will see.
Show where it is stipulated that you must be homosexual to marry someone of the same gender.

I'm waiting...
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6220|Places 'n such

lowing wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

If you're going to lie to get married for financial reasons why, again, does it matter who you're marrying? Surely it doesn't really matter if you're marrying a man, woman or cardboard cutout of buzz lightyear?
I never had to declare that I was marrying for love, but you just suggested that you will have to lie about being gay to marry same sex, question is why?
You don't have to lie. You've just invented this.

e: seriously, you're arguing that you want the colour of your invisible hat to be yellow, not orange.

Last edited by presidentsheep (2011-06-26 16:29:19)

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5437|Sydney

presidentsheep wrote:

lowing wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

If you're going to lie to get married for financial reasons why, again, does it matter who you're marrying? Surely it doesn't really matter if you're marrying a man, woman or cardboard cutout of buzz lightyear?
I never had to declare that I was marrying for love, but you just suggested that you will have to lie about being gay to marry same sex, question is why?
You don't have to lie. You've just invented this.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:


Well duh!

That's why this is called "same-sex marriage", meaning anyone can marry another person of the same gender.

Face it, this whole discussion is utterly ridiculous.
As long as anyone can marry same sex and not just homosexuals, as I said we will see.
Show where it is stipulated that you must be homosexual to marry someone of the same gender.

I'm waiting...
I can't, I never said it did, I have always said, it is something that might be tested in court and that we will see. I have always said, I will be curious to see if this law means 2 people that are not gay, can marry without having to lie about their relationship.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5437|Sydney
For two non-gay people of the same gender to marry, they'd have to be a bit fucked in the head tbh.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5617|London, England

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:


As long as anyone can marry same sex and not just homosexuals, as I said we will see.
Show where it is stipulated that you must be homosexual to marry someone of the same gender.

I'm waiting...
I can't, I never said it did, I have always said, it is something that might be tested in court and that we will see. I have always said, I will be curious to see if this law means 2 people that are not gay, can marry without having to lie about their relationship.
And why would that be any different than two straight people marrying for benefits? Or... a gay person and a straight person (of different sexes) marrying for benefits?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

Jaekus wrote:

For two non-gay people of the same gender to marry, they'd have to be a bit fucked in the head tbh.
yeah and the world isn't full of people fucked in the head is it?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

Jay wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:


Show where it is stipulated that you must be homosexual to marry someone of the same gender.

I'm waiting...
I can't, I never said it did, I have always said, it is something that might be tested in court and that we will see. I have always said, I will be curious to see if this law means 2 people that are not gay, can marry without having to lie about their relationship.
And why would that be any different than two straight people marrying for benefits? Or... a gay person and a straight person (of different sexes) marrying for benefits?
It might not, I am saying that I would be curious to see of 2 straight people that declare they are straight and want to get married would get challenged by the govt. for NOT being gay and seeking same sex marriage.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5617|London, England

lowing wrote:

Jay wrote:

lowing wrote:

I can't, I never said it did, I have always said, it is something that might be tested in court and that we will see. I have always said, I will be curious to see if this law means 2 people that are not gay, can marry without having to lie about their relationship.
And why would that be any different than two straight people marrying for benefits? Or... a gay person and a straight person (of different sexes) marrying for benefits?
It might not, I am saying that I would be curious to see of 2 straight people that declare they are straight and want to get married would get challenged by the govt. for NOT being gay and seeking same sex marriage.
If the goal is to defraud the government or a job or some such then it doesn't matter if the people committing the fraud are straight or gay. I'm fairly certain that straight people getting married for benefits has been prosecuted in the past.

Here, found an article about people being prosecuted for gaming the green card system:
When a woman recently asked for a copy of her marriage license, the court clerk in suburban Atlanta’s Gwinnett County had to break some unpleasant news: Her husband was listed as the groom in eight marriages in the county.

The husband was later arrested in September on suspicion of bigamy, just days after another man was charged in the same county with similar offenses. Two weeks later, a woman from nearby Decatur was charged with marrying six men in less than two years without ever dissolving her first marriage.

Federal immigration authorities are investigating whether the three defendants were part of a sham-marriage ring aimed at helping immigrants from Africa obtain their green cards, or permanent U.S. residency.

Immigration officials and prosecutors say phony green-card marriages are a common and growing crime, and they are cracking down.

“It took much more significance after 9/11,” said Martin Ficke, agent in charge of the New York City office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “With a real green card, you get a lot more access. It’s a major priority for ICE.”

If the three defendants were part of a green-card scheme, that would not surprise Gwinnett County Probate Court Chief Clerk Marlene Duwell, who has seen plenty of suspicious things among the thousands of people she deals with each year.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15351469/ns … marriages/

So why wouldn't phony same sex marriages be investigated too? Pro tip: they would be.

Last edited by Jay (2011-06-26 17:08:53)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5960|College Park, MD
I blame sham marriages on Obozo the Clown.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

Jay wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jay wrote:

And why would that be any different than two straight people marrying for benefits? Or... a gay person and a straight person (of different sexes) marrying for benefits?
It might not, I am saying that I would be curious to see of 2 straight people that declare they are straight and want to get married would get challenged by the govt. for NOT being gay and seeking same sex marriage.
If the goal is to defraud the government or a job or some such then it doesn't matter if the people committing the fraud are straight or gay. I'm fairly certain that straight people getting married for benefits has been prosecuted in the past.

Here, found an article about people being prosecuted for gaming the green card system:
When a woman recently asked for a copy of her marriage license, the court clerk in suburban Atlanta’s Gwinnett County had to break some unpleasant news: Her husband was listed as the groom in eight marriages in the county.

The husband was later arrested in September on suspicion of bigamy, just days after another man was charged in the same county with similar offenses. Two weeks later, a woman from nearby Decatur was charged with marrying six men in less than two years without ever dissolving her first marriage.

Federal immigration authorities are investigating whether the three defendants were part of a sham-marriage ring aimed at helping immigrants from Africa obtain their green cards, or permanent U.S. residency.

Immigration officials and prosecutors say phony green-card marriages are a common and growing crime, and they are cracking down.

“It took much more significance after 9/11,” said Martin Ficke, agent in charge of the New York City office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “With a real green card, you get a lot more access. It’s a major priority for ICE.”

If the three defendants were part of a green-card scheme, that would not surprise Gwinnett County Probate Court Chief Clerk Marlene Duwell, who has seen plenty of suspicious things among the thousands of people she deals with each year.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15351469/ns … marriages/

So why wouldn't phony same sex marriages be investigated too? Pro tip: they would be.
because bigamy is against the law, same sex marriage isn't. Marrying aliens to get them into the country is against the law, same sex marriage isn't. I know the intent or spirit of this law, and I agree with it wholeheartedly. It will be interesting to see what happens to people that use it for their own gains for reasons other than allowing gay people to marry.

There is no where in the laws that say 2 people MUST marry for love. I predict a straight same sex marriage will be tested in court.

Last edited by lowing (2011-06-26 18:19:18)

Dauntless
Admin
+2,249|7001|London

lowing I don't read DST much, but I can normally see your point even if I don't agree with it

but I have no idea what you're trying to say here

Is it just "hey i wonder what would happen if two straight guys got married"?

like jay said, if people abuse marriage to game the system in some way they will be investigated, weather they had a gay marriage or straight marriage...
https://imgur.com/kXTNQ8D.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6910|USA

Dauntless wrote:

lowing I don't read DST much, but I can normally see your point even if I don't agree with it

but I have no idea what you're trying to say here

Is it just "hey i wonder what would happen if two straight guys got married"?

like jay said, if people abuse marriage to game the system in some way they will be investigated, weather they had a gay marriage or straight marriage...
But 2 straight people that get married for financial gain or advantage would not be investigated, happens all the time. Is it really so far fetched to wonder if 2 straight people could get away with it? 2 gay people getting married would go without question. Would 2 straight people getting married go unchallenged? See what I am gettin' at?
Dauntless
Admin
+2,249|7001|London

well if you take it for granted that two gay people getting married would definitely go without question then yes i suppose i can see what you're saying

but why would two gay people getting married automatically go without question?

and I don't think you can say two straight people getting married for financial gain would not be investigated either, i'm sure a lot of the time people get away with it fairly easily but it's not like investigations don't happen.

If the officer suspects that your marriage is fraudulent, you will be meeting the fraud unit. An officer will interview you and your spouse separately and intensively. The officer will compare the results of your two interviews. Sometimes, truly married couples also get suspected because of their personal characteristics or lifestyle and may have to go through a fraud interview. People who do not seem to share a common language, have large differences in age, class, cultural, religion, educational background or who don't live at the same address may be called for a fraud interview. You may also be called if your application missed facts that would prove a bona fide marriage, contains some inconsistencies, or presents grounds for suspicion.
http://www.immihelp.com/greencard/famil … rview.html
https://imgur.com/kXTNQ8D.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard