BF2S Forums Sarah Palin

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Hell no.

Really? Palin is against organ donations? link please.

Never said she was, I said she wasn't for "Everyone's an organ donor unless people explicitly state otherwise."

If she is, link please.

lol you made the claim, link it

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Really? Palin is against organ donations? link please.

Never said she was, I said she wasn't for "Everyone's an organ donor unless people explicitly state otherwise."

If she is, link please.

lol you made the claim, link it

I can't link to a policy that doesn't exist, derp.

I'm sure not every policy Palin thinks is linkable anyway. She needs to throw her hat in the ring to start wth. Stop being the media whore and see where some actual works leads her.

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

I'm sure not every policy Palin thinks is linkable anyway. She needs to throw her hat in the ring to start wth. Stop being the media whore and see where some actual works leads her.

Yeah who needs that anyway, much easier to just make up whatever you like. book burnings anyone?

Exactly. Until Palin releases her specific policy on book burning, we're just going to jump to the conclusion.

We don't even know if she is running for President yet.

Lowing, do you think she could be the VP for any of the current runners?

Huntman / Palin perhaps?

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

I'm sure not every policy Palin thinks is linkable anyway. She needs to throw her hat in the ring to start wth. Stop being the media whore and see where some actual works leads her.

Yeah who needs that anyway, much easier to just make up whatever you like. book burnings anyone?

Exactly. Until Palin releases her specific policy on book burning, we're just going to jump to the conclusion.

We don't even know if she is running for President yet.

Lowing, do you think she could be the VP for any of the current runners?

Huntman / Palin perhaps?

Who knows, what I do think is, she can do worse than what we already have as VP.

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

I can't link to a policy that doesn't exist, derp.

then you can't say she is against a plan she has never seen or made a decision on.

Anyone with half a brain can see it's more likely she would be against a plan like that for it.

really why?

derp

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Yeah who needs that anyway, much easier to just make up whatever you like. book burnings anyone?

Exactly. Until Palin releases her specific policy on book burning, we're just going to jump to the conclusion.

We don't even know if she is running for President yet.

Lowing, do you think she could be the VP for any of the current runners?

Huntman / Palin perhaps?

Who knows, what I do think is, she can do worse than what we already have as VP.

Well if not Palin for President, I think she'd make a fine VP. Problem is, who does she align with the most?

I personally would loathe to see a Bachmann/Palin ticket.

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Anyone with half a brain can see it's more likely she would be against a plan like that for it.

really why?

Are you saying you don't have half a brain?

Hmm, ok.

whatever you say Jaekus, you made a claim all I am asking is you give reason to it. If you won't or can't I don't care. Will just chalk it up to your normal bullshit of cheap shots and accusations with very little substance.

I actually was talking to someone else, you then attempted to troll and then complain when I refuse to engage.

You're an odd fellow.

Jaekus wrote:

I actually was talking to someone else, you then attempted to troll and then complain when I refuse to engage.

You're an odd fellow.

Thats fine, don't prove your claims to him either, I don't care.

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

I actually was talking to someone else, you then attempted to troll and then complain when I refuse to engage.

You're an odd fellow.

Thats fine, don't prove your claims to him either, I don't care.

Basic rule of logic: you can't prove a negative.

Should try it sometime.

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Who knows, what I do think is, she can do worse than what we already have as VP.

Well if not Palin for President, I think she'd make a fine VP. Problem is, who does she align with the most?

I personally would loathe to see a Bachmann/Palin ticket.

actually I don't want her anywhere near it. I think where ever she goes, it will eliminate all chances of a republican victory and thus ensuring more Obama.

You're probably right. And I think Palin knows it too. She's just doing all these tours / book signings / tv shows just as a way to make money which is a shame.