It got started in the beginning with people saying Palin being a creationist is an example of why she shouldn't be President.tuckergustav wrote:
...and talk about it in another thread.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
It got started in the beginning with people saying Palin being a creationist is an example of why she shouldn't be President.tuckergustav wrote:
...and talk about it in another thread.
Last edited by Hurricane2k9 (2011-06-21 19:16:06)
and they've all been proven wrong by even more educated people like Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawkings, Stephen Jay Gould, etc...War Man wrote:
Lol, educated, lol. There are creationists that are far better educated and far more intelligent than these educated people in the forums.
And if you want to discuss how this affects her bid for the Presidency, fine...but if you want to get into a debate about Creationism in and of itself, take it elsewhere. Seriously, it's not that unreasonable to ask that you guys not turn every thread into a religious back and forth.War Man wrote:
It got started in the beginning with people saying Palin being a creationist is an example of why she shouldn't be President.tuckergustav wrote:
...and talk about it in another thread.
why do mods pick on the easy targets? fucking fail. everyone has a go at him and yet you single him out.tuckergustav wrote:
And if you want to discuss how this affects her bid for the Presidency, fine...but if you want to get into a debate about Creationism in and of itself, take it elsewhere. Seriously, it's not that unreasonable to ask that you guys not turn every thread into a religious back and forth.War Man wrote:
It got started in the beginning with people saying Palin being a creationist is an example of why she shouldn't be President.tuckergustav wrote:
...and talk about it in another thread.
you would be angry too if everyone shit on you in every threadeleven bravo wrote:
cus hes a young idiot who thinks he's smarter than he is and gets very beligerent with the forum.
I don't think I'm entirely intelligent, I have faith that I am on the correct side. Or at least almost. I know I have got alot to learn.eleven bravo wrote:
cus hes a young idiot who thinks he's smarter than he is and gets very beligerent with the forum.
Last edited by War Man (2011-06-21 19:23:23)
C'mon FEOS, you have read the argument that she is retarded because she believes men and dinosaurs lived at the same time. Fine if you wanna say she lacks critical thinking skills instead of saying "retarded", fine, still, it ridiculous to think that belief equates to WW3 and "pushing the button".FEOS wrote:
Lacking critical thinking skills =/= "retarded"
An example of someone believing in something that has loads of scientific evidence against the position taken--such as humans and dinosaurs coexisting--is an example of flawed critical thinking skills. Not a problem with her belief in creationism. Creationism does not teach that man and dinosaurs lived simultaneously. Creationism teaches that God created the universe. There is a difference between those two positions, and that difference is empirical evidence and critical thinking. To fault her ability on the latter does not in any way fault her belief in creationism writ large.
Does that sufficiently explain what you're missing?
How is this picking? I made a non targeted statement(actually, it would have been in response to FEOS) that he responded to. Hence why he is quoted.11 Bravo wrote:
why do mods pick on the easy targets? fucking fail. everyone has a go at him and yet you single him out.tuckergustav wrote:
And if you want to discuss how this affects her bid for the Presidency, fine...but if you want to get into a debate about Creationism in and of itself, take it elsewhere. Seriously, it's not that unreasonable to ask that you guys not turn every thread into a religious back and forth.War Man wrote:
It got started in the beginning with people saying Palin being a creationist is an example of why she shouldn't be President.
you should have said that last sentence like i dunno pages ago.tuckergustav wrote:
How is this picking? I made a non targeted statement that he responded to. Hence why he is quoted.11 Bravo wrote:
why do mods pick on the easy targets? fucking fail. everyone has a go at him and yet you single him out.tuckergustav wrote:
And if you want to discuss how this affects her bid for the Presidency, fine...but if you want to get into a debate about Creationism in and of itself, take it elsewhere. Seriously, it's not that unreasonable to ask that you guys not turn every thread into a religious back and forth.
I just got here dude.11 Bravo wrote:
you should have said that last sentence like i dunno pages ago.tuckergustav wrote:
How is this picking? I made a non targeted statement that he responded to. Hence why he is quoted.11 Bravo wrote:
why do mods pick on the easy targets? fucking fail. everyone has a go at him and yet you single him out.
For the millionth time, I never mentioned Obama. Do try to keep up for once.lowing wrote:
No, the counter argument is your selective criticism and your priorities in thinking Palins creationism opinion is worse than Obama's cover ups, his opaque administration, and unethical, unscrupulous and morally corrupt associations and their actions within our govt.Jaekus wrote:
She's an easy target for the media because she has set herself up to be one.13rin wrote:
I didn't see any 'crying', more of an observation pointing out the hypocrisy and as Dill illustrated the straw man. I haven't glossed anything over. I'm amazed that this thread has gone this far. Palin really bothers people. She's polarizing and has endured and overcome a vicious media campaign against her. I still believe she'd would have made a better VP than Biden, and she shouldn't run for President.
As much as you carry on about her being targeted in the media I haven't noticed anyone actually saying she is intelligent or hasn't said and believes in dumb things. At most the counter argument has been "but... other people have said dumb things... and other people believe in religion"
Weak.
I believe she said something about being able to reach more people. Which she has done, that's for sure.War Man wrote:
I don't believe she resigned as Governor because she couldn't handle it. She wants to work on the sidelines and being Governor doesn't give her much time and freedom she'd need to do so.
tbh I hadn't read properly into it, I had just read that somewhere.War Man wrote:
I don't believe she resigned as Governor because she couldn't handle it. She wants to work on the sidelines and being Governor doesn't give her much time and freedom she'd need to do so.
Probably made up bullshit by people that really hate her.Jaekus wrote:
tbh I hadn't read properly into it, I had just read that somewhere.War Man wrote:
I don't believe she resigned as Governor because she couldn't handle it. She wants to work on the sidelines and being Governor doesn't give her much time and freedom she'd need to do so.
It's politics and media, it happens all the time.War Man wrote:
Probably made up bullshit by people that really hate her.Jaekus wrote:
tbh I hadn't read properly into it, I had just read that somewhere.War Man wrote:
I don't believe she resigned as Governor because she couldn't handle it. She wants to work on the sidelines and being Governor doesn't give her much time and freedom she'd need to do so.