BF2S Forums Sarah Palin

lowing wrote:

Shocking wrote:

And with that I suppose you are mostly referring to domestic issues specifically the healthcare plan right?

I can agree on that it's a bad idea to nationalise healthcare in a country like the US.

Well not only that, the whole idea that a nation can tax itself into prosperity thing, or the, you work harder so others don't have to thing, the, I am going to be the most transparent president ever thing etc... there is a lot to bitch about domestically

Varegg wrote:

You keep stressing those two issues like it ever was something Obama actually said

Dilbert_X wrote:

Varegg wrote:

You keep stressing those two issues like it ever was something Obama actually said

Man creates imaginary straw-man
Man knocks down imaginary straw-man
Man is genius

19 Pages and its no smarter than 'Obama bad -> Palin good'

lowing wrote:

FEOS wrote:

lowing wrote:

no it was a what if to gauge just how important an issue man living with dinosaurs is ,compared to real issues that REALLY should concern you. The what if being, finding out Palin was right, would it change anything for you since your big hang up is men vs dinosaurs and not the economy, the wars, foreign policy etc....

Obama quintupled our national debt, started another war, rose the unemployment rate to double digits, has a tax cheat in charge of the treasury, yeah but, Palin believes in creationism!! GET A ROPE!!! Fuckin' ridiculous, honestly.

Lowing, I think the issue is not that she is a creationist alone. The issue is that she lacks critical thinking skills. To say something like "humans and dinosaurs coexisted" or to even insinuate such a thing--when there is zero evidence to support such a statement and loads of evidence to contradict it--should give one pause when considering her thought processes in general.

That is not to say that Obama is a great alternative, based on his proven track record in office. Tbh, if it were between her and Obama, I'd be pulling hard for a third party candidate...any third party candidate.

If it isn't the issue alone and you think she is "retard" then surely there is something with a little more bite to it to use as an example of her retardation. It is a personal belief, not her national policy. Considering the shit Obama has done, in real life, it is a benign belief that dos not affect anything, and you wanna claim it is more dangerous than Obama's ACTUAL policies and plans. That is what I dispute.

Kmar wrote:

She quits her elected position, invites TV cameras in her home, joins fox news, stars in her own reality show, puts out a book, tours the nation in a giant bus with her name plastered across the constituttion. .. and she wonders why the media won't leave her alone?

She's trying to supplant her ignorance with sympathy. The fact that people actually buy this victim of the "lame stream" media act is amazing to me.

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

it is stupid to focus on Palin

This thread is about Palin

lowing wrote:

I know what you are saying, and I understand it. My point has never been Palin isn't a retard

lowing wrote:

Retarded how? What has she done that was so retarded, wear white after labor day? I mean it is bullshit like her wardrobe that the the left goes after. Hell, like sharks in the water they couldn't wait to tear apart her released emails, and once they did they still got nothing. I found it funny that the left ripped her apart over the paul revere comments, only to find out she was right. Then they started in on the, "well, she was right by accident", yeah, and SHE is the retard? lol

lowing wrote:

I mean c'mon, this board spent YEARS trashing Bush for absolutely everything under the sun. Obama is a continuation of those exact same polices yet he gets a pass and is largely ignored or forgiven or defended by those same people. Palin comes along and has literally done nothing, yet now you turn the blow torch toward her instead of Obama because of shit SHE MIGHT do? A little to obvious as to your motives folks. Conveniently we are not talking about ethics or morality or corruption in Washington, hell no, the real threat is Palin, and what she might do because she believes in creationism.

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

I wonder what it's like to be so stubborn that despite a whole forum trying to show you ANY other side of the story one continues to CHOOSE to be blind.

Guess I'll never know.

Lets face jaekus, you hate Palin because she is a conservative and you can't come up with any real scandal or controversy to justify it. So you attack her belief in creationism and the possibility that based on that she could push the button and start WW3. As if THAT, and not the felons, and morally and ethically corrupt officials in Washington are the real problem. Why not just say you hate her because she has a different opinion than you do and move along. No need to invent shit like book burnings and Paul Revere "facts".

Oh and for you to ignore my point on this topic, doesn't that make you equally as stubborn? Thats different I suppose.

You are wonderful at putting words in people's mouths, real talent you have there.

If you bother going back through the thread you'll find I've said none of these things.

Your argument is as flimsy as a tissue.