Has it occurred to you that I am aware of things, just that I analyze things in a different way? Also, I ain't a bible thumper and don't think the world is 5000 years old, I am not much of a Christian as I've said before. I don't pray much, and I don't go to church(although, in my opinion, God sees the world as an entire church so there isn't a need to go into a "visible" Church unless you want some advice or better understanding of the Bible on occasion). You also don't know my parents and how I differ from them, yet you people here judge me. Proves to me how you guys are a bunch of assholes in real life.Jay wrote:
Because she's not a brainwashed bible thumper that thinks the world is 5000 years old? She was raised catholic, it doesnt mean it dominates every facet of her life. One day you will realize what a tiny minority people like you and your parents really are. Its going to make you a very angry person.War Man wrote:
Why are you marrying a Catholic then if you can't stomach them?Jay wrote:
Just want to defend one of lowings points. Science and religion can coexist. I know there are a lot of rabid atheists here but I'm perfectly ok if a person of faith accepts evolution and chalks it up to intelligent design. I'm cool with them attributing the big bang to their god. Its not like you can prove it wasnt done by their god anyway. I'd rather accept them on these terms than dismiss them completely because of intellectual bigotry.
The only people I can't stomach are creationists.
My parents don't belong to a cult. I don't belong to a cult.Jay wrote:
I'd be pretty pissed off if I discovered one day that my parents had brainwashed me and kept me locked away like the intellectual equivalent of veal. Then again, I was never a member of an obvious cult so what do I know?Shocking wrote:
ThatJay wrote:
One day you will realize what a tiny minority people like you and your parents really are. Its going to make you a very angry person.
Nein, I want to live for a good amount of time and alcohol doesn't exactly help, maybe on occasion have a little bit but not too much.Jay wrote:
Will what? Leave his mothers womb? Maybe. Keeps saying he wants to join the army. He'll be an alcoholic within a year.Shocking wrote:
I don't believe he will
73% of this forum is a fake tan and new haircut away from being this guyWar Man wrote:
Proves to me how you guys are a bunch of assholes in real life.
She was right and she was wrong. Revere, when he was captive, was trying to intimidate the British. Sure in a meta kind of way you could say that Revere did warn the British (at gun point). But that was not the primary intent. Furthermore Revere did not say anything about the Brits taking their guns. Reverse's ride certainly had nothing to do with the second amendment and gun rights. There's also no evidence of warning shots being fired.lowing wrote:
ummmm you do realize she was proven right on that don't you? SO if you want to call her a dumb ass for her Paul Revere comment, and then it turns out she was right and YOU were wrong, doesn't that kinda sorta make YOU the dumb ass then? Or wait, let me guess, it is different then right?Spearhead wrote:
Palin is NOT fit to be president. Thats the real issue here. Romney, Pawlenty, etc, as much as I wouldnt want them to be president are still competent and capable of holding the office.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oS4C7bvHv2w
This is not an anomoly, she has proven over and over that she cannot communicate effectively, and on top of that, she's an uneducated dumbass. She is full of shit.
lowing wrote:
What if they found a human skeleton inside a dinosaur?
lololololololVaregg wrote:
lowing wrote:
What if they found a human skeleton inside a dinosaur?
Nothing you say ever again can be taken seriously after this, just thinking there is a microscopic chance that this will ever happen is beyond me ...
Cybargs wrote:
lololololololVaregg wrote:
lowing wrote:
What if they found a human skeleton inside a dinosaur?
Nothing you say ever again can be taken seriously after this, just thinking there is a microscopic chance that this will ever happen is beyond me ...
She still is a creationist though is she not? You said you can't stomach creationists, referring to them all in general.Jay wrote:
Because she's not a brainwashed bible thumper that thinks the world is 5000 years old? She was raised catholic, it doesnt mean it dominates every facet of her life. One day you will realize what a tiny minority people like you and your parents really are. Its going to make you a very angry person.War Man wrote:
Why are you marrying a Catholic then if you can't stomach them?
Most religious people are not creationists you know, the church have moved on since the dark ages ...War Man wrote:
She still is a creationist though is she not? You said you can't stomach creationists, referring to them all in general.Jay wrote:
Because she's not a brainwashed bible thumper that thinks the world is 5000 years old? She was raised catholic, it doesnt mean it dominates every facet of her life. One day you will realize what a tiny minority people like you and your parents really are. Its going to make you a very angry person.War Man wrote:
Why are you marrying a Catholic then if you can't stomach them?
Gee Varegg, I guess you missed the "WHAT IF" and the part where I said I was playing devil's advocate for the sake of asking the question, just how important is that issue to anyone?Varegg wrote:
lowing wrote:
What if they found a human skeleton inside a dinosaur?
Nothing you say ever again can be taken seriously after this, just thinking there is a microscopic chance that this will ever happen is beyond me ...
Sorry lowing but in this case I am absolutely 100% convinced Obama is a better choice than Palin. Difference of opinion or not.lowing wrote:
lol if I can't agree huh, and not if WE can't agree? figures.
and what is it you are basing your opinion on? WHat has obama done that convinces you he is better than, well, anyone quite frankly? Still buying into that "hope change" bullshit I see. Keep the dream alive my man.Shocking wrote:
Sorry lowing but in this case I am absolutely 100% convinced Obama is a better choice than Palin. Difference of opinion or not.lowing wrote:
lol if I can't agree huh, and not if WE can't agree? figures.
Still, alright, we can't agree on that so I'm calling it quits.
I'm not comparing him to 'anyone' I'm comparing him to Palin and only Palin. That was the comparison "is Obama better than Palin"? That was a yes.lowing wrote:
and what is it you are basing your opinion on? WHat has obama done that convinces you he is better than, well, anyone quite frankly? Still buying into that "hope change" bullshit I see. Keep the dream alive my man.
It's very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where-- where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is-- from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to-- to our state.Dilbert_X wrote:
So what is Palin actually offering?
For the sake of asking the question and what if? ... there is no what if ...lowing wrote:
Gee Varegg, I guess you missed the "WHAT IF" and the part where I said I was playing devil's advocate for the sake of asking the question, just how important is that issue to anyone?Varegg wrote:
lowing wrote:
What if they found a human skeleton inside a dinosaur?
Nothing you say ever again can be taken seriously after this, just thinking there is a microscopic chance that this will ever happen is beyond me ...
