Shocking wrote:
I read through 7 pages of this shit, brick walls talking to eachother. Great 'debate' guys, rehash the same rubbish and shoot it down in 50 different ways.
And lowing, it's ridiculous how you're comparing Obama to Palin in terms of intelligence. You can't catch Obama on anything except people he associated / talked to and him mis-speaking. You're comparing this to a woman who has -personally- shown to be completely (wilfully) ignorant of history and biology (the latter indicating a huge lack of knowledge and interest on scientific fields). Furthermore, her cultural background is extremely lacking if she's trying to ban books like Brave New World and Lord of the Flies from a library, deeming them to be 'offending'.
Generally, you don't want someone who doesn't understand science, lacks even the most basic knowledge of history, isn't well-read and who likes to come across as a 'hockey mom' being anywhere near a position of actual power, let alone leading a nation. You don't want to set her across people like Hu Jintao, Putin or Sarkozy to discuss international issues, relations and other political endeavours. She doesn't even personally understand them, is quite probably ignorant of the cultural barrier and isn't articulate on any level bar the most basic forms of conversation. She embodies ignorance and idiocy. You'd see all three of the aforementioned politicians either walking out of the room before she's even started/finished talking or taking full advantage of her stupidity.
Last but not least, as Jay mentioned before, she's got her own TV show in which she has access to the editing and even there she only comes across as a blissfully ignorant woman. Only serves to reinforce the belief that Palin is an idiot, with her own consent to make matters worse.
You're comparing this to your current POTUS, a well read articulate debater, politically savvy summa cum laude Harvard graduate who has at the very least shown to be reasonable. If you can't see the enormous difference between the two then either you are blinded by some sort of hatred for Obama or you seriously need to work on what you value in a leading figure. It's not a difference of opinion, if you truly believe Palin isn't any worse, or maybe even better than Obama, there's something seriously wrong in your reasoning.
You are right, except for him
1. not being able to think for himself and answer any questions unrehearsed,
2. didn't know we have a Marine Corps and not a Marine Corpse,
3.has not done a thing to improve the economy, but has managed to drop us deeper in debt,
4. would rather blame ATMS for the unemployment rate over his govt. decision making,
5. his entire inner circle is made up of felons, racists, terrorists and cheats,
6. graduating from Columbia but not with honors, yet was accepted into Harvard Law School, suggesting he was offered up, far more than he earned the position there
7. his election to president of HLR was not based on academic achievement( something he admitted)
8. the deliberate refusal to release, or allow the release, of any of his college records or papers, so we can all see just how smart he really is seems quite suspicious as well given the means by which he was accepted into Harvard and elected as president of the HLR.
Do you really think I can't go on?
But yeah other than any of that shit, Mr. "Transparency" is a hellova guy. He has been groomed more than he has earned anything that resembles an achievement.
Not sure why it is so hard to accept the fact that Obama ain't no genius either. Point is, no one in or around Washington is, yet you want to single out Palin as the greatest threat? This is what we really disagree on, who has done more damage or will do more damage. and in my opinion it is hard to top Obama in that category. Especially when absolutely everything you accuse Bush for being stupid over, is continued or enhanced by Obama, but according to you, HE is the smart one. Whatever.
