Yeah just like you agree Obama is a retard as well...ok got it.Jaekus wrote:
So you agree with the posts made in this thread pointing out her stupidity. Ok, got it.lowing wrote:
Yes they have, and points of Obama have been presented, only to be dismissed. Don't see any inconsistency there. I didn't say Palin was a genious, my point was, based on your examples, every politician is a retard.Jaekus wrote:
Is that all you've got? It's quite tedious to read the same things again and again. Points of Palin's stupidity have been presented. How about showing how she is not stupid to counterbalance the argument? Or are all you going to focus on is her dress and Paul Revere?
I am not the one focused on her dress or Paul Revere, the media has. If there were anything really for them to focus on they would have. Unfortunately all they can do is invent shit or trash her family.
We're talking about Palin, not anyone else.lowing wrote:
Not my point, my point is how one sided your opinions are on what constitutes stupidity. Does not being able to speak without a teleprompter count?
What would she have to do to lose your vote?
Fuck Israel
She does not have my vote. Herman Cain does. and the point is, your reasoning for not voting for her, should have been enough to not vote for Obama.Dilbert_X wrote:
We're talking about Palin, not anyone else.lowing wrote:
Not my point, my point is how one sided your opinions are on what constitutes stupidity. Does not being able to speak without a teleprompter count?
What would she have to do to lose your vote?
but to answer your question directly, what she would have to do to lose my vote: Adopt a liberal/socialist political philosophy.
Last edited by lowing (2011-06-19 06:49:10)
For the second time, I never mentioned Obama.lowing wrote:
Yeah just like you agree Obama is a retard as well...ok got it.Jaekus wrote:
So you agree with the posts made in this thread pointing out her stupidity. Ok, got it.lowing wrote:
Yes they have, and points of Obama have been presented, only to be dismissed. Don't see any inconsistency there. I didn't say Palin was a genious, my point was, based on your examples, every politician is a retard.
I am not the one focused on her dress or Paul Revere, the media has. If there were anything really for them to focus on they would have. Unfortunately all they can do is invent shit or trash her family.
Until you can challenge any of the points made regarding Palin's stupidity (which you have so far avoided) we all agree she is a dunce and we can move on.
I'm glad that's all cleared up. Night lads.
I can't, she has said some stupid things, point is, JUST LIKE ALL OTHER politicians. Your opinion that she somehow stands out compared to others like Obama is inconsistent with your reasoning as to why one should not vote for her. Under your reasoning, no one should vote for ANYONE.Jaekus wrote:
For the second time, I never mentioned Obama.lowing wrote:
Yeah just like you agree Obama is a retard as well...ok got it.Jaekus wrote:
So you agree with the posts made in this thread pointing out her stupidity. Ok, got it.
Until you can challenge any of the points made regarding Palin's stupidity (which you have so far avoided) we all agree she is a dunce and we can move on.
I'm glad that's all cleared up. Night lads.
She believes humans and dinosaurs coexisted. She's a fucking loony.
Good night, (again.)
Good night, (again.)
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
and Obama thinks there are 57 states, thinks govt. is the answer to all problems, and thinks taxation is the road to prosperity. What is the point?Ty wrote:
She believes humans and dinosaurs coexisted. She's a fucking loony.
Good night, (again.)
Last edited by lowing (2011-06-19 07:02:42)
Sorry, but I want an intelligent leader. She doesn't fit the bill. She's a former weather girl turned half-assed governor. She's a bimbo lowing. As much as I dislike Bachman, at least she has a brain in her head.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
and you feel you have an intelligent leader now? Not cunning, not charismatic, but intelligent? If intelligence was your criteria, and you are not wrong, what do you say to those that voted for Obama?Jay wrote:
Sorry, but I want an intelligent leader. She doesn't fit the bill. She's a former weather girl turned half-assed governor. She's a bimbo lowing. As much as I dislike Bachman, at least she has a brain in her head.
Do you, honestly, believe that?lowing wrote:
and Obama thinks there are 57 states
Why are my choices an intelligent Obama or a not-intelligent Republican candidate? You do understand that there are intelligent people in the Republican party too, right? If my choices were between Palin and Obama I simply wouldn't vote, or I'd vote 3rd party.lowing wrote:
and you feel you have an intelligent leader now? Not cunning, not charismatic, but intelligent? If intelligence was your criteria, and you are not wrong, what do you say to those that voted for Obama?Jay wrote:
Sorry, but I want an intelligent leader. She doesn't fit the bill. She's a former weather girl turned half-assed governor. She's a bimbo lowing. As much as I dislike Bachman, at least she has a brain in her head.
And what Republicans don't seem to understand is that to win an election, they need my vote a helluva lot more than they need yours. You're going to vote red regardless.
Last edited by Jay (2011-06-19 07:27:57)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Christ's sake I'm not going to sleep anyway if I don't respond to this.lowing wrote:
and Obama thinks there are 57 states, thinks govt. is the answer to all problems, and thinks taxation is the road to prosperity. What is the point?Ty wrote:
She believes humans and dinosaurs coexisted. She's a fucking loony.
Good night, (again.)
Did you not read what I wrote? She thinks people and dinosaurs coexisted. This doesn't concern you? This doesn't say to you that "yeah, this woman is not all that on the ball"?
And you would equate this by definition insane belief to one campaign speech where a tired politician mistakenly said there are 57 states? Let's get in context what you were talking about here.
57 State remark.
And you would say this is on the same level as somone believing that people coexisted with dinosaurs outside of The Flintstones and that Raquel Welch movie.
Again I don't want to get into Obama but you've compared political ideology that you personally don't agree with to a belief that humans and dinosaurs lived together. Are you out of your mind? Political ideology, whatever it happens to be, is theory based on evidence. By its very nature it is rational. A belief that humans and dinosaurs coexisted on the other hand is on the utter extreme levels of irrationality. It is bat-shit crazy.
Now I'm going to try and not think about this and try to get some sleep now, it's past 2:30 in the morning, but I really need to know: Do you seriously believe that a belief in a particular political ideology, be it communism, capitalism, facism, libertarianism or anything else, do you think that this is comparable to a belief that humans and dinosaurs coexisted? I think - fuck I hope - that if you actually put some thought into this instead of trying to hit me with a comeback as fast as possible you'll realise the utter absurdity of what you suggested before.
Good Night again, and I seriously mean it this time, (dammit I hope so at least.)
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Hey he said it, seems to be enough doesn't it?
Not true, I am going to vote for who ISN'T a socialist. That happens to be Herman Cain.Jay wrote:
Why are my choices an intelligent Obama or a not-intelligent Republican candidate? You do understand that there are intelligent people in the Republican party too, right? If my choices were between Palin and Obama I simply wouldn't vote, or I'd vote 3rd party.lowing wrote:
and you feel you have an intelligent leader now? Not cunning, not charismatic, but intelligent? If intelligence was your criteria, and you are not wrong, what do you say to those that voted for Obama?Jay wrote:
Sorry, but I want an intelligent leader. She doesn't fit the bill. She's a former weather girl turned half-assed governor. She's a bimbo lowing. As much as I dislike Bachman, at least she has a brain in her head.
And what Republicans don't seem to understand is that to win an election, they need my vote a helluva lot more than they need yours. You're going to vote red regardless.
The whole point is, they want to trash Palin for being stupid, and not worthy of the presidency, but compared to which candidate on the left, exactly?
No I am comparing 2 politicians that have their fair share of goofs and stupidity. You want to cement Palin in hers and grease Obama for his. It is inconsistent based on your loathing of stupid politicians.Ty wrote:
Christ's sake I'm not going to sleep anyway if I don't respond to this.lowing wrote:
and Obama thinks there are 57 states, thinks govt. is the answer to all problems, and thinks taxation is the road to prosperity. What is the point?Ty wrote:
She believes humans and dinosaurs coexisted. She's a fucking loony.
Good night, (again.)
Did you not read what I wrote? She thinks people and dinosaurs coexisted. This doesn't concern you? This doesn't say to you that "yeah, this woman is not all that on the ball"?
And you would equate this by definition insane belief to one campaign speech where a tired politician mistakenly said there are 57 states? Let's get in context what you were talking about here.
57 State remark.
And you would say this is on the same level as somone believing that people coexisted with dinosaurs outside of The Flintstones and that Raquel Welch movie.
Again I don't want to get into Obama but you've compared political ideology that you personally don't agree with to a belief that humans and dinosaurs lived together. Are you out of your mind? Political ideology, whatever it happens to be, is theory based on evidence. By its very nature it is rational. A belief that humans and dinosaurs coexisted on the other hand is on the utter extreme levels of irrationality. It is bat-shit crazy.
Now I'm going to try and not think about this and try to get some sleep now, it's past 2:30 in the morning, but I really need to know: Do you seriously believe that a belief in a particular political ideology, be it communism, capitalism, facism, libertarianism or anything else, do you think that this is comparable to a belief that humans and dinosaurs coexisted? I think - fuck I hope - that if you actually put some thought into this instead of trying to hit me with a comeback as fast as possible you'll realise the utter absurdity of what you suggested before.
Good Night again, and I seriously mean it this time, (dammit I hope so at least.)
I don't agree with his politics, but Obama is an intelligent guy. Palin is an uneducated hick. To compare the two is laughable.lowing wrote:
Not true, I am going to vote for who ISN'T a socialist. That happens to be Herman Cain.Jay wrote:
Why are my choices an intelligent Obama or a not-intelligent Republican candidate? You do understand that there are intelligent people in the Republican party too, right? If my choices were between Palin and Obama I simply wouldn't vote, or I'd vote 3rd party.lowing wrote:
and you feel you have an intelligent leader now? Not cunning, not charismatic, but intelligent? If intelligence was your criteria, and you are not wrong, what do you say to those that voted for Obama?
And what Republicans don't seem to understand is that to win an election, they need my vote a helluva lot more than they need yours. You're going to vote red regardless.
The whole point is, they want to trash Palin for being stupid, and not worthy of the presidency, but compared to which candidate on the left, exactly?
I want the Republicans to put up someone at least as intelligent. Is that so much to ask for?
Last edited by Jay (2011-06-19 08:34:36)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Would be nice if any of that "intelligence" would have materialized in his presidency. and Palin, based on what everyone hated Bush for, could have done no worse than Obama has done.Jay wrote:
I don't agree with his politics, but Obama is an intelligent guy. Palin is an uneducated hick. To compare the two is laughable.lowing wrote:
Not true, I am going to vote for who ISN'T a socialist. That happens to be Herman Cain.Jay wrote:
Why are my choices an intelligent Obama or a not-intelligent Republican candidate? You do understand that there are intelligent people in the Republican party too, right? If my choices were between Palin and Obama I simply wouldn't vote, or I'd vote 3rd party.
And what Republicans don't seem to understand is that to win an election, they need my vote a helluva lot more than they need yours. You're going to vote red regardless.
The whole point is, they want to trash Palin for being stupid, and not worthy of the presidency, but compared to which candidate on the left, exactly?
I want the Republicans to put up someone at least as intelligent. Is that so much to ask for?
Have you looked at Herman Cain? Thoughts?
I don't have any reason to pay attention until the general election. I can't vote in the primaries so I'm stuck with whatever trash the parties put up.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I understand that, but lets go with the big "IF". Is he a guy you would vote for?Jay wrote:
I don't have any reason to pay attention until the general election. I can't vote in the primaries so I'm stuck with whatever trash the parties put up.
Yea, but he's not Bush so you can't use it... Seems to be how the game is played nowadays..lowing wrote:
Hey he said it, seems to be enough doesn't it?
@ jay
Palin graduated from the University of Idaho in 1987 (apparently transferring around quite a bit)
Last edited by 13rin (2011-06-19 08:46:16)
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
I don't know anything about him besides him being a bald black businessman with glasses.lowing wrote:
I understand that, but lets go with the big "IF". Is he a guy you would vote for?Jay wrote:
I don't have any reason to pay attention until the general election. I can't vote in the primaries so I'm stuck with whatever trash the parties put up.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
exactly, a conservative who is NOT a politician.Jay wrote:
I don't know anything about him besides him being a bald black businessman with glasses.lowing wrote:
I understand that, but lets go with the big "IF". Is he a guy you would vote for?Jay wrote:
I don't have any reason to pay attention until the general election. I can't vote in the primaries so I'm stuck with whatever trash the parties put up.
Yeah, ok. He's a politician now isn't he?lowing wrote:
exactly, a conservative who is NOT a politician.Jay wrote:
I don't know anything about him besides him being a bald black businessman with glasses.lowing wrote:
I understand that, but lets go with the big "IF". Is he a guy you would vote for?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
politicians get the ultimate facepalm
So you think the University of Idaho is comparable to Harvard in terms of education?13rin wrote:
Yea, but he's not Bush so you can't use it... Seems to be how the game is played nowadays..lowing wrote:
Hey he said it, seems to be enough doesn't it?
@ jay
Palin graduated from the University of Idaho in 1987 (apparently transferring around quite a bit)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat