Maybe the equipable knife will always do lethal damage, whereas the quick knife is reduced.
Just a speculation.
Just a speculation.
Pages: 1 … 136 137 138 139 140 … 683
Which is a blatant lie.Kampframmer wrote:
Probably because the commo rose is impossible to put in a console game.
pfffffffffffffffhahahaaaglobefish23 wrote:
Which is a blatant lie.Kampframmer wrote:
Probably because the commo rose is impossible to put in a console game.
An identical 8-way dial is used in Lego Harry Potter to select the spells:
What's so funny?.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
pfffffffffffffffhahahaaaglobefish23 wrote:
Which is a blatant lie.Kampframmer wrote:
Probably because the commo rose is impossible to put in a console game.
An identical 8-way dial is used in Lego Harry Potter to select the spells:
globefish23 wrote:
Lego Harry Potter
globefish23 wrote:
Lego
Uzique wrote:
sorry but i can't spam 'enemy boat spotted' then this game isn't worth a poop on a stick
Must you moan about snipers on every single page? Really...Doctor Strangelove wrote:
No, you were either sitting in the back getting spare kills, not attacking points or you were spamming claymores and being faggots. Fuck snipers. Ruin every single fucking game.Ilocano wrote:
Such disdain for snipers. Back on BF2, we were the only ones spotting and softening up targets for you. Putting too much sway will just make it worse for your team. It's not like the noob snipers will give up sniping. They'll just be worse at it.
Don't get me wrong I'm not bitter. I accept change more than most (playing 2142, BC2 and not whining the whole way through).Kampframmer wrote:
it wont be bf2 and i dont expect nor want it to be.
Maybe accept a little change?
You rang?UnkleRukus wrote:
"Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted"
But 8 does.Vilham wrote:
because 6 doesn't go into 64 for a start.RDMC wrote:
'Can opt out of being revived' <---
'4 man squad, including a Squad Leader ' why not 6? Since its going to be 64 players the pc anyway.
'Kill Cam (new form, TBA)
Steal enemy dog tags via stealth knife kills' Definitly do not like this..
i dont think it will be.jsnipy wrote:
Don't get me wrong I'm not bitter. I accept change more than most (playing 2142, BC2 and not whining the whole way through).Kampframmer wrote:
it wont be bf2 and i dont expect nor want it to be.
Maybe accept a little change?
I'm not wanting it to be bf2, but rather have the revolutionary charm, the innovation. Hoping it will not be like every other fggty COD game.
why get it on both systems?Ilocano wrote:
While I'm getting this for PC and Console, hopefully on console they'll add private match modes (unranked) that requires less than 8 players. One of the features that MW got right.
Fix'tKampframmer wrote:
why get it on both systems?Ilocano wrote:
While I'm getting this for PC and Console, hopefully on console they'll add private match modes (unranked) that requires less than 8 players. One of the features that MW got right.
Get bf3 for pc and mw3 for console
thxRDMC wrote:
Fix'tKampframmer wrote:
why get it on both systems?Ilocano wrote:
While I'm getting this for PC and Console, hopefully on console they'll add private match modes (unranked) that requires less than 8 players. One of the features that MW got right.
Get bf3 for pc and mw3 for console
Attempting to measure gameplay, not ZOMG graphixJaekus wrote:
I think the game is showing a lot of promise. Measuring it against a now six year old game is pointless when you consider .
Me too, hence the rest of the post without the paraphrasing.jsnipy wrote:
Attempting to measure gameplay, not ZOMG graphixJaekus wrote:
I think the game is showing a lot of promise. Measuring it against a now six year old game is pointless when you consider .
Last edited by Jaekus (2011-06-10 10:14:03)
Pages: 1 … 136 137 138 139 140 … 683