Spark wrote:
Coal won't run out for centuries. We have staggering amounts of the stuff.Dilbert_X wrote:
Not for a while, but even coal will run out eventually. In the meantime the price will rise.
And there's no benefit in discussing how systems compare if you don't try to quantify the unquantifiables.
Do you know the projected coal consumption of China?
Its a lot.
Its a lot.
Fuck Israel
well good thing we have a lot and a ton of natural gas
Also, watch 'Gasland'.11 Bravo wrote:
The sun won't run out for billions of years, and its free. We should use that.
Fuck Israel
nah
lololololololDilbert_X wrote:
Also, watch 'Gasland'.11 Bravo wrote:
The sun won't run out for billions of years, and its free. We should use that.
"here, watch this propaganda, it will change your mind"
Tool.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Natural gas is actually a really good medium-term option.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
not when the opposition uses it bas one of their major points.Dilbert_X wrote:
As does the coal mining industry, only more so.FEOS wrote:
They ignore, for example, the ecological cost of mining
leaching into ground water is such a better option?Which is likely much easier, and a closed loop process, than trying to collect millions of tonnes of gas and ash spread all over the planet - maybe you could estimate some costs for that.disposal of their technology
like big vats of energy drink?There are ways to store energy besides in batteries.Of course. The Energizer Bunny comes along to each house and powers it at night/in bad weather/etc, silly.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
That you need to insult anyone and everyone who disagrees with your blinkered and spoon-fed opinion says more about you TBH.Jay wrote:
lololololololDilbert_X wrote:
Also, watch 'Gasland'.11 Bravo wrote:
The sun won't run out for billions of years, and its free. We should use that.
"here, watch this propaganda, it will change your mind"
Tool.
Fuck Israel
I thought storing energy for more than a few hours defined a battery. Unless you want a really big fly wheel lol.
Which is a mechanical battery...Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
I thought storing energy for more than a few hours defined a battery. Unless you want a really big fly wheel lol.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Or you can store it as heat, as Hydrogen or as potential energy.
Or you can use a flywheel, they aren't very practical on a large scale though.
Or you can use a flywheel, they aren't very practical on a large scale though.
Fuck Israel
Heat dissipates quickly. There is no way in hell you are an engineer like you claim.Dilbert_X wrote:
Or you can store it as heat, as Hydrogen or as potential energy.
Or you can use a flywheel, they aren't very practical on a large scale though.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Where's the diploma?
1,300 metric tonnes of nickel-cadmium battery provides enough power for 12,000 people for 7 minutes. Lol. At best you could attach the entire world onto the same grid and use the spare capacity in the grid as a battery. Can see that being fairly cost prohibitive let alone the red tape involved.http://e360.yale.edu/feature/the_challenge_for_green_energy_how_to_store_excess_electricity/2170/ wrote:
...the world’s largest battery backup has been storing energy for an entire city: Fairbanks, Alaska. Isolated as it is, and not part of any regional electricity grid, the metropolitan area of about 100,000 residents needs an electricity backstop more than most: In its sub-zero winters, pipes can freeze solid in as little as two hours. Six years ago, the city installed a huge nickel-cadmium battery, the same technology used for years in laptop computers and other portable devices.
Housed in a giant warehouse, the 1,300-metric ton battery is larger than a football field, and can crank out 40 million watts of power. Still, the Fairbanks battery provides only enough electricity for about 12,000 residents for seven minutes.
They also briefly touch on the idea of using Hydrogen but this has yet to be practically demonstrated on close to the required scale and begs the very obvious question of how do you store millions of tonnes of hydrogen? You're just making a giant bomb and putting it underground...
From what I have found lithium ion batteries are the most likely solution for storing energy unless you can provide evidence of a wind farm storing its energy as heat?
lift a weight into spaceJay wrote:
Heat dissipates quickly. There is no way in hell you are an engineer like you claim.Dilbert_X wrote:
Or you can store it as heat, as Hydrogen or as potential energy.
Or you can use a flywheel, they aren't very practical on a large scale though.
You can store electricity as hydrogen? Really? You can just miracle hydrogen into existence with electricity?Dilbert_X wrote:
Or you can store it as heat, as Hydrogen or as potential energy.
Or you can use a flywheel, they aren't very practical on a large scale though.
Oh, sure, you can do the whole separating water into hydrogen and oxygen thing. But then there's loss and you've got volatile hydrogen to store and deal with (Hindenburg, anyone?). And it takes FOREVER. That's just a ridiculously poor idea.
Same with the flywheel. Tons of loss via mechanical movement. Hugely impractical, even on a small scale in comparison to a battery.
Stick to mechanical engineering.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
LOL OK Same as things slow down fast?Jay wrote:
Heat dissipates quickly. There is no way in hell you are an engineer like you claim.Dilbert_X wrote:
Or you can store it as heat, as Hydrogen or as potential energy.
Or you can use a flywheel, they aren't very practical on a large scale though.
So what was your degree exactly?
Same question to you.FEOS wrote:
loss via mechanical movement
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-05-24 01:26:57)
Fuck Israel
Electrical engineering...with an emphasis on power.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
So you didn't cover conservation of momentum then?
Or maybe you can explain what you mean by 'loss via mechanical movement'.
Or maybe you can explain what you mean by 'loss via mechanical movement'.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-05-24 01:34:34)
Fuck Israel
A little thing called "friction." Or didn't they cover that in your mechanical engineering courses? Or are you assuming a lossless flywheel in you world of unicorns and glitter?Dilbert_X wrote:
So you didn't cover conservation of momentum then?
Or maybe you can explain what you mean by 'loss via mechanical movement'.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
However you store it, you will always have losses meaning you have to generate quite a bit more than you will actually need. Especially considering how much electricity is used at night or on dark, stormy days.
Only in the real world.Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
However you store it, you will always have losses meaning you have to generate quite a bit more than you will actually need. Especially considering how much electricity is used at night or on dark, stormy days.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
I guess thermodynamics wasn't a requirement.FEOS wrote:
A little thing called "friction." Or didn't they cover that in your mechanical engineering courses? Or are you assuming a lossless flywheel in you world of unicorns and glitter?Dilbert_X wrote:
So you didn't cover conservation of momentum then?
Or maybe you can explain what you mean by 'loss via mechanical movement'.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
This is high-school science more like... I'm a physicist who skipped stat mech and has only done about three weeks of thermo and I know this
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman