First GOP presidential debate tonight

2011-05-05 07:42:25

#1

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5844

"Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, Texas Rep. Ron Paul, businessman Herman Cain and former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson will face off in Greenville, S.C., in the Fox News-sponsored debate that begins at 9 p.m."

If the PSN doesn't go up tonight I'll watch this otherwise it's getting DVR'd for sunday. Anyone have plans to watch this one?

2011-05-05 07:46:24

#2

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5617|London, England

If the race was just those 5 we would end up with a viable candidate.

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2011-05-05 07:53:00

#3

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5844

Santorum and Pawlenty are typical social conservatives blowhards. I never heard of Gary Johnson. Ron Paul and Herman Cain? lol

The only possible candidate the GOP has that I like or has a good shot at Obama is Mitch Daniels.

2011-05-05 07:56:09

#4

eleven bravo: Member; +1,399|5518|foggy bottom

gary johnson is cool

Tu Stultus Es

2011-05-05 07:57:11

#5

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5617|London, England

eleven bravo wrote:
gary johnson is cool

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2011-05-06 16:06:45

#6

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6704|The Land of Scott Walker

First debate I've actually enjoyed watching. Obama is toast if the Reps run Cain, Pawlenty, or Santorum.

2011-05-06 17:09:15

#7

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5617|London, England

Stingray24 wrote:
First debate I've actually enjoyed watching. Obama is toast if the Reps run Cain, Pawlenty, or Santorum.

Johnson. I will never vote for a social conservative. If you want any shot at winning the election, you cant do it without the under thirty vote. The republican party is dying because of this.

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2011-05-06 17:10:53

#8

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6756

google "santorum"

2011-05-06 17:42:02

#9

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|5960|College Park, MD

lol fuck Rick Santorum

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg

2011-05-06 17:45:45

#10

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,979|6891|949

Santorum's an absolute fucktard.

Are debates even worth watching these days? I mean, obviously they affect the general voting public's thoughts, but it's largely superficial influence. A lot of people talk shit on Obama for being well composed and a good speaker if it's rehearsed, but what exactly are you seeing when you watch someone debate that's any different?

2011-05-06 18:08:50

#11

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6704|The Land of Scott Walker

Jay wrote:
Stingray24 wrote:
First debate I've actually enjoyed watching. Obama is toast if the Reps run Cain, Pawlenty, or Santorum.
Johnson. I will never vote for a social conservative. If you want any shot at winning the election, you cant do it without the under thirty vote. The republican party is dying because of this.

We're going to win this on the economy. So we need someone who can articulate that well and bring in the social conservative vote. Otherwise they vote 3rd party and the Democrat wins. Every Republican president in my lifetime has been a social conservative.

2011-05-06 18:27:41

#12

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6756

Stingray24 wrote:
We're going to win this on the economy.

heh, never thought i'd live to see a mormon president.

2011-05-06 19:13:31

#13

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6704|The Land of Scott Walker

Why not?

2011-05-06 19:15:39

#14

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5617|London, England

Stingray24 wrote:
Jay wrote:
Stingray24 wrote:
First debate I've actually enjoyed watching. Obama is toast if the Reps run Cain, Pawlenty, or Santorum.
Johnson. I will never vote for a social conservative. If you want any shot at winning the election, you cant do it without the under thirty vote. The republican party is dying because of this.
We're going to win this on the economy. So we need someone who can articulate that well and bring in the social conservative vote. Otherwise they vote 3rd party and the Democrat wins. Every Republican president in my lifetime has been a social conservative.

Which is why theyve been destroyed outside of the midwest. Bush lost the popular vote. mccain didnt lose because he wasnt conservative enough. He lost because palin represented nothing but rednecks. Put up another social conservatard and watch what happens.

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2011-05-06 20:03:52

#15

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6756

Jay wrote:
mccain didnt lose because he wasnt conservative enough.

"Our economy, I think, is still -- the fundamentals of our economy are strong." --Jacksonville, Fla., Sept. 15, 2008. John McCain

mccain is a war hero, and an idiot.

2011-05-06 20:06:28

#16

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6756

Stingray24 wrote:
Why not?

because the mormon's espouse prophesy, that this great nation would be saved by a mormon, when the constitution hung from a thread.

far better this nation rewrite the constitution than being beholden to a mormon.

2011-05-07 21:47:01

#17

Blue Herring: Member; +13|5063

burnzz wrote:
Jay wrote:
mccain didnt lose because he wasnt conservative enough.
"Our economy, I think, is still -- the fundamentals of our economy are strong." --Jacksonville, Fla., Sept. 15, 2008. John McCain

mccain is a war hero, and an idiot.

I don't see how that quote makes him stupid. It seems more like he just started with one sentence and ended with another, a common mistake when people speak.

2011-05-07 22:38:15

#18

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6933|Canberra, AUS

I think he was about to say "Our economy, I think, is still strong" and then thought "shit".

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2011-05-07 22:53:40

#19

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6411|what

These guys have more chance of winning.

2011-05-07 23:26:09

#20

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,053|7030|PNW

Macbeth wrote:
Anyone have plans to watch this one?

A race between a Republican and a Democrat is a race between Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum. Why should a "debate" between Republicans be any more interesting nowadays? It's just going to look to people like more empty suits giving lip service to the common man while they themselves are steeped in riches.

I'm sorry, I guess I've just been turned off by radio and TV debate. All it is is a bunch of people trying to talk over one another out of turn.

2011-05-07 23:46:18

#21

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5437|Sydney

unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Anyone have plans to watch this one?
A race between a Republican and a Democrat is a race between Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum. Why should a "debate" between Republicans be any more interesting nowadays? It's just going to look to people like more empty suits giving lip service to the common man while they themselves are steeped in riches.

I'm sorry, I guess I've just been turned off by radio and TV debate. All it is is a bunch of people trying to talk over one another out of turn.

As odd as it may sound it is good to hear. Our politics here in Aussie land are very much the same.

2011-05-08 07:14:19

#22

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6933|Canberra, AUS

the last debate here was an exercise in pain

probably gave the masterchef finale's ratings an even bigger bump because of the refugees from the torture by sedation - not that it needed it though

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2011-05-08 23:19:11

#23

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6859|132 and Bush

Throughout the debate, Ron Paul stated positions that were contrary to mainstream Republicans. Nearly every response oozed of antipathy towards successfully concluding our military missions in Iraq and Afghanistan and utilizing enhanced interrogation techniques, even for the likes of Khalid Sheik Mohammed – the mastermind of 9/11.

He is against the use of prisons for enemy combatants, humanitarian and foreign aid, the reorganization and consolidation of our homeland security, traditional marriage, the AZ illegal immigration act, wants to get rid of the federal reserve, intonated a return to the gold standard and at one point stated he was for legalizing drugs such as heroin and cocaine – I’m not kidding.

The debate moderators at one point had to ask Paul and Johnson how they expected to win the Republican nomination with anti-Republican viewpoints such as these.

Politically though, no modern presidential candidate has won the Republican nomination being fiscally imprudent, negligent on social issues, and anti-defense. Look at the most recent Republican presidential nominees and how they were able to appeal politically to the three main constituencies.

While prickly with the conservative base, John McCain knew he had to win over enough people from each of the three main groups to win the Republican nomination. His position of strength was national security having served in the US Navy and was the leading proponent in congress for the Iraqi surge. He was consistently pro-life and appealed to economic voters using the line that government spending like drunken sailors was an insult to drunken sailors.

George W. Bush unabashedly was a social conservative referring to his reaffirmation of Jesus Christ in his adult life during the 2000 campaign. He appealed to fiscal conservatives touting his plans for tax cuts and appealed to defense conservatives supporting a missile defense shield and a non-nation building approach to foreign policy.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/opi … z1LpbHrWyC

Oh no! Ron Paul is an aspiring drug lord! Evil Evil little man, you CANT be serious!

Unfortunately Americans put a lot of weight in the quick snarky answers that spark an emotion. The deep, thoughtful, and comprehensive remarks get very little response or coverage. I believe the reason for this is because we have become lazy intellectually. It's pretty sad, since a complex problem needs a complex answer.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2011-05-08 23:26:17

#24

Blue Herring: Member; +13|5063

Kmar wrote:
Throughout the debate, Ron Paul stated positions that were contrary to mainstream Republicans. Nearly every response oozed of antipathy towards successfully concluding our military missions in Iraq and Afghanistan and utilizing enhanced interrogation techniques, even for the likes of Khalid Sheik Mohammed – the mastermind of 9/11.

He is against the use of prisons for enemy combatants, humanitarian and foreign aid, the reorganization and consolidation of our homeland security, traditional marriage, the AZ illegal immigration act, wants to get rid of the federal reserve, intonated a return to the gold standard and at one point stated he was for legalizing drugs such as heroin and cocaine – I’m not kidding.

The debate moderators at one point had to ask Paul and Johnson how they expected to win the Republican nomination with anti-Republican viewpoints such as these.

Politically though, no modern presidential candidate has won the Republican nomination being fiscally imprudent, negligent on social issues, and anti-defense. Look at the most recent Republican presidential nominees and how they were able to appeal politically to the three main constituencies.

While prickly with the conservative base, John McCain knew he had to win over enough people from each of the three main groups to win the Republican nomination. His position of strength was national security having served in the US Navy and was the leading proponent in congress for the Iraqi surge. He was consistently pro-life and appealed to economic voters using the line that government spending like drunken sailors was an insult to drunken sailors.

George W. Bush unabashedly was a social conservative referring to his reaffirmation of Jesus Christ in his adult life during the 2000 campaign. He appealed to fiscal conservatives touting his plans for tax cuts and appealed to defense conservatives supporting a missile defense shield and a non-nation building approach to foreign policy.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/opi … z1LpbHrWyC
Oh no! Ron Paul is an aspiring drug lord! Evil Evil little man, you CANT be serious!

Unfortunately Americans put a lot of weight in the quick snarky answers that spark an emotion. The deep, thoughtful, and comprehensive remarks get very little response or coverage. I believe the reason for this is because we have become lazy intellectually. It's pretty sad, since a complex problem needs a complex answer.

I'm surprised these people were sitting there saying "WHAT? THESE ARE YOUR VIEWPOINTS?" As though Ron Paul hasn't held these ideologies forever.

2011-05-08 23:56:40

#25

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6859|132 and Bush

Blue Herring wrote:
Kmar wrote:
Throughout the debate, Ron Paul stated positions that were contrary to mainstream Republicans. Nearly every response oozed of antipathy towards successfully concluding our military missions in Iraq and Afghanistan and utilizing enhanced interrogation techniques, even for the likes of Khalid Sheik Mohammed – the mastermind of 9/11.

He is against the use of prisons for enemy combatants, humanitarian and foreign aid, the reorganization and consolidation of our homeland security, traditional marriage, the AZ illegal immigration act, wants to get rid of the federal reserve, intonated a return to the gold standard and at one point stated he was for legalizing drugs such as heroin and cocaine – I’m not kidding.

The debate moderators at one point had to ask Paul and Johnson how they expected to win the Republican nomination with anti-Republican viewpoints such as these.

Politically though, no modern presidential candidate has won the Republican nomination being fiscally imprudent, negligent on social issues, and anti-defense. Look at the most recent Republican presidential nominees and how they were able to appeal politically to the three main constituencies.

While prickly with the conservative base, John McCain knew he had to win over enough people from each of the three main groups to win the Republican nomination. His position of strength was national security having served in the US Navy and was the leading proponent in congress for the Iraqi surge. He was consistently pro-life and appealed to economic voters using the line that government spending like drunken sailors was an insult to drunken sailors.

George W. Bush unabashedly was a social conservative referring to his reaffirmation of Jesus Christ in his adult life during the 2000 campaign. He appealed to fiscal conservatives touting his plans for tax cuts and appealed to defense conservatives supporting a missile defense shield and a non-nation building approach to foreign policy.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/opi … z1LpbHrWyC
Oh no! Ron Paul is an aspiring drug lord! Evil Evil little man, you CANT be serious!

Unfortunately Americans put a lot of weight in the quick snarky answers that spark an emotion. The deep, thoughtful, and comprehensive remarks get very little response or coverage. I believe the reason for this is because we have become lazy intellectually. It's pretty sad, since a complex problem needs a complex answer.
I'm surprised these people were sitting there saying "WHAT? THESE ARE YOUR VIEWPOINTS?" As though Ron Paul hasn't held these ideologies forever.

That's the media shaping the news to invoke a response. If someone says something that goes against the grain over and over then it's not news or apparently shocking. Combine that with a cloaked editorial that offers sound bites of abbreviated comments that are out of context and you've got an audience eagerly waiting to be manipulated.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

BF2S Forums First GOP presidential debate tonight

eleven bravo wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Jay wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Jay wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Jay wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

burnzz wrote:

Jay wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Kmar wrote:

Blue Herring wrote:

Kmar wrote:

Board footer