BF2S Forums Obama Press Conference: Bin Laden Is Dead

lowing wrote:

Shahter wrote:

lowing wrote:

ok you do realize that is "moderate" muslims that are pissed right? We are not talking about suicide bombers here.

yes. they are pissed because one of their faith has been assassinated and denied the proper burial. move along.

Ummm this board has gone to great lengths to emphasize OBL had nothing to do with Islam. Plenty of Christians are killed and no other Christians give so much a fuck about it that a nation is willing suppress free press and free speech out of fear of Christ reprisals. So what makes Islam so different?

ghettoperson wrote:

FEOS wrote:

So what exactly is the beef with UBL's burial treatment? It was presided over by a Muslim cleric, his body was ritually bathed IAW Koranic directives, his hair was oiled IAW Koranic directives, he was placed in a white muslin bag IAW Koranic directives, and he was buried (at sea) within a day of his death IAW Koranic directives.

Where's the problem again?

99% of Muslims by the sound of it are very appreciative of this, it's just some people that you'll never please. Mostly because they're a little annoyed that we killed Bin Laden.

lowing wrote:

No it is every Muslim. I don't have any evidence of this but I'll keep saying it anyway.

Sturgeon wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

FEOS wrote:

So what exactly is the beef with UBL's burial treatment? It was presided over by a Muslim cleric, his body was ritually bathed IAW Koranic directives, his hair was oiled IAW Koranic directives, he was placed in a white muslin bag IAW Koranic directives, and he was buried (at sea) within a day of his death IAW Koranic directives.

Where's the problem again?

99% of Muslims by the sound of it are very appreciative of this, it's just some people that you'll never please. Mostly because they're a little annoyed that we killed Bin Laden.

lowing wrote:

No it is every Muslim. I don't have any evidence of this but I'll keep saying it anyway.

Shahter wrote:

lowing wrote:

Shahter wrote:

obl had a lot to do with islam - he was an imam ffs. the fact that christians don't give a fuck about other christians being killed indicates only that the societies christianity parasitizes on operates in do not require that. if you removed your dick from me's ass and allowed them to develop their culture and progress on their own islam would eventually have to adapt to reflect that - just as christianity did in the past.

Better watch it, it has been made very clear by the Bf2S brain trust that OBL was "nutter" and a "cunt" and had NOTHING to do with Islam.

oh, c'mon, you know all too well i'm not with that "Bf2S brain trust" - after all i don't beleave in democracy, capitalism, freedom of speech and a lot of other things that, supposedly, were "proven right" long long ago.

He did not act in the name of Islam and he was not representative of the Islam.

well, he certainly wanted to be regarded as if he did, but, as i said, nodoby but the likes of you, man, would buy that shit.

Yet, somehow, Islam is upset about his treatment. Wonder why?

islam is not, can not, be upset about anything - people are for the reasons i already posted above.

ALso wonder why Muslims were not upset at the images of Americans hanging from a bridge in Itaq burnt to a crisp.

how many muslims did you ask about that?

That, "Islam needs time to develop" is a cop out and I think you know it. It should be easier for Islam, after all they have something we didn't. A road map to development.

you assume the only possible way of development is the one taken by the west, this is yet another thing that's been "proven right". i could give you countless arguments against, but i'm sure i'll be disregarded as "conspiracy theorist" and "evil commie" again. try to look at the matter from different angles and see it through the eyes of those people you so easily call "violent and malevolent" - who knows, maybe you'll see what i'm talking about.

Last edited by lowing (2011-05-06 04:55:03)

lowing wrote:

Shahter wrote:

lowing wrote:

Better watch it, it has been made very clear by the Bf2S brain trust that OBL was "nutter" and a "cunt" and had NOTHING to do with Islam.

oh, c'mon, you know all too well i'm not with that "Bf2S brain trust" - after all i don't beleave in democracy, capitalism, freedom of speech and a lot of other things that, supposedly, were "proven right" long long ago.

He did not act in the name of Islam and he was not representative of the Islam.

well, he certainly wanted to be regarded as if he did, but, as i said, nodoby but the likes of you, man, would buy that shit.

Yet, somehow, Islam is upset about his treatment. Wonder why?

islam is not, can not, be upset about anything - people are for the reasons i already posted above.

ALso wonder why Muslims were not upset at the images of Americans hanging from a bridge in Itaq burnt to a crisp.

how many muslims did you ask about that?

That, "Islam needs time to develop" is a cop out and I think you know it. It should be easier for Islam, after all they have something we didn't. A road map to development.

you assume the only possible way of development is the one taken by the west, this is yet another thing that's been "proven right". i could give you countless arguments against, but i'm sure i'll be disregarded as "conspiracy theorist" and "evil commie" again. try to look at the matter from different angles and see it through the eyes of those people you so easily call "violent and malevolent" - who knows, maybe you'll see what i'm talking about.

you mean there is a different road than freedom that is much more desirable to travel? Do tell.

as for the rest, I am not going to address fragments of sentences. If you want to address my entire post then do so and I will respond.

Shahter wrote:

lowing wrote:

Shahter wrote:

lowing wrote:

Better watch it, it has been made very clear by the Bf2S brain trust that OBL was "nutter" and a "cunt" and had NOTHING to do with Islam.

oh, c'mon, you know all too well i'm not with that "Bf2S brain trust" - after all i don't beleave in democracy, capitalism, freedom of speech and a lot of other things that, supposedly, were "proven right" long long ago.

He did not act in the name of Islam and he was not representative of the Islam.

well, he certainly wanted to be regarded as if he did, but, as i said, nodoby but the likes of you, man, would buy that shit.

Yet, somehow, Islam is upset about his treatment. Wonder why?

islam is not, can not, be upset about anything - people are for the reasons i already posted above.

ALso wonder why Muslims were not upset at the images of Americans hanging from a bridge in Itaq burnt to a crisp.

how many muslims did you ask about that?


you assume the only possible way of development is the one taken by the west, this is yet another thing that's been "proven right". i could give you countless arguments against, but i'm sure i'll be disregarded as "conspiracy theorist" and "evil commie" again. try to look at the matter from different angles and see it through the eyes of those people you so easily call "violent and malevolent" - who knows, maybe you'll see what i'm talking about.

you mean there is a different road than freedom that is much more desirable to travel? Do tell.

define "freedom" then we'll talk.

as for the rest, I am not going to address fragments of sentences. If you want to address my entire post then do so and I will respond.

ah, i see. i addressed every little piece of your post, actually. you have nothing to say? k.

Shahter wrote:

lowing wrote:

Shahter wrote:

lowing wrote:

you mean there is a different road than freedom that is much more desirable to travel? Do tell.

define "freedom" then we'll talk.


ah, i see. i addressed every little piece of your post, actually. you have nothing to say? k.

Well if you can not look at western society and an Islamic society and see the differences in freedom, then I can not help you.

you can't even tell me what freedom is, but you claim there's difference in it between some society and another? hmmm...

Oh no, I will stand by everything I say, I will not however, dissect every sentence until the context of what was said is obscured, then try to argue it.  you address every "little piece", try addressing the post.

but i did. you "entire post" composed of nonsencial claims. sorry, man, but no matter how you combine those pieces, the result would still be noncensial - that i tried to demostrate. you've nothing to add? k

Shahter wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

So the bigger the crime the less the law applies?

I still say Madoff should have been waterboarded.

i recently finished reading "The Dead Zone", and there's this question:

if you could go back in time and had an opportunity to kill hitler, would you do it?

lowing wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Awesome another debate about Islam.

were you really expecting a thread about the most hated MUSLIM terrorist in the world, the controversy that now surrounds him by Muslims, and have Islam NOT be a part of the discussion? Really?

Shahter wrote:

i'm not a muslim but i'm pissed all the same (though i'm not sure if you actually killed him). i understand why you'd do it, mind you, but the way it's been handled is simply outrageous.

Macbeth wrote:

lowing wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Awesome another debate about Islam.

were you really expecting a thread about the most hated MUSLIM terrorist in the world, the controversy that now surrounds him by Muslims, and have Islam NOT be a part of the discussion? Really?

Did you notice there wasn't a single mention of Islam until you arrived?