Adams_BJ wrote:
the fuck is a red skull
Poseidon wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2vbugkd
Adams_BJ wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2vbugkdAdams_BJ wrote:
the fuck is a red skull
...Poseidon wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2vbugkd
Inception.
Inception.
He-Man
thisAdams_BJ wrote:
need more
http://www.comicbooked.com/wp-content/u … 5/thor.jpg
and less pretty boy with no powers. Real Thor takes shit from no one.
I'll probs check it out.
Of course, Batman is still the best of the superheros
Of course, Batman is still the best of the superheros
batman is a lie
The Avengers movie better have a runtime of four hours. It would be utter-shite if the runtime is less than 2.5 hours because there would be no substantial amount of time for each character development. You know the comic-book nerds will be bitching that their hard-on super hero only had four lines in the movie.Poseidon wrote:
The main reason this movie is being made is so that they can put Thor in The Avengers, which is coming out in 2012. Hence the major SHIELD parts in Iron Man 2, the Captain America and Thor movies this coming year, etc.PrivateVendetta wrote:
SHIELD involved again?
He hardly looks like he needs a team to be part of..
inb4Trilogy
I'm hoping for at least 3+ hours too. It's gotta be one of the most hyped up movies of recent years.loubot wrote:
The Avengers movie better have a runtime of four hours. It would be utter-shite if the runtime is less than 2.5 hours because there would be no substantial amount of time for each character development. You know the comic-book nerds will be bitching that their hard-on super hero only had four lines in the movie.Poseidon wrote:
The main reason this movie is being made is so that they can put Thor in The Avengers, which is coming out in 2012. Hence the major SHIELD parts in Iron Man 2, the Captain America and Thor movies this coming year, etc.PrivateVendetta wrote:
SHIELD involved again?
He hardly looks like he needs a team to be part of..
I didn't get why they have Heimdall in the 2nd poster and not Loki
because he looks fucking badass?
He's bit player in the Thor universe, hes the gate guard of the rainbow roadPrivateVendetta wrote:
because he looks fucking badass?
Personally...no. As long as everything is planned well, I'd rather have a trilogy or one tightly-filmed 2:00/2:30 flick than a gut-busting three-and-a-half hour comic book movie. All the background lore is supposed to be covered by its predecessors.Poseidon wrote:
I'm hoping for at least 3+ hours too. It's gotta be one of the most hyped up movies of recent years.loubot wrote:
The Avengers movie better have a runtime of four hours. It would be utter-shite if the runtime is less than 2.5 hours because there would be no substantial amount of time for each character development. You know the comic-book nerds will be bitching that their hard-on super hero only had four lines in the movie.Poseidon wrote:
The main reason this movie is being made is so that they can put Thor in The Avengers, which is coming out in 2012. Hence the major SHIELD parts in Iron Man 2, the Captain America and Thor movies this coming year, etc.
Want. To. See.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thor/
Getting pretty damn good reviews.
Def gonna try and catch it this weekend.
Getting pretty damn good reviews.
Def gonna try and catch it this weekend.
Thor 2 is in talks but it depends what the finances come out for this one
They keep talking about everything that is riding on this movie, in particular the Avengers movie .... that Thor needs to do some big bucks so that they know Avengers will do good
Ironman should have been the movie that had more riding on its shoulders then Thor ..... with Ironman, you've got a 2nd tier character (at the time) with no other character help from the same company .... with Thor, you've got Captain America just a few weeks behind
They keep talking about everything that is riding on this movie, in particular the Avengers movie .... that Thor needs to do some big bucks so that they know Avengers will do good
Ironman should have been the movie that had more riding on its shoulders then Thor ..... with Ironman, you've got a 2nd tier character (at the time) with no other character help from the same company .... with Thor, you've got Captain America just a few weeks behind
Not surprising considering I heard Loki (the villain from this movie) is the big villain for The Avengers. It's like 9 of them vs. him.SEREMAKER wrote:
They keep talking about everything that is riding on this movie, in particular the Avengers movie .... that Thor needs to do some big bucks so that they know Avengers will do good
they hinted to skrulls also ..... its all over the placePoseidon wrote:
Not surprising considering I heard Loki (the villain from this movie) is the big villain for The Avengers. It's like 9 of them vs. him.SEREMAKER wrote:
They keep talking about everything that is riding on this movie, in particular the Avengers movie .... that Thor needs to do some big bucks so that they know Avengers will do good
I received a free movie pass on any movie and any movie screen. Should I squander the free pass on Thor. decisions decisions
Does it expire?
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Nope
Wait until a good amount of people on bf2s express their opinions.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
-.-"
protip: whatever war man tells you to do, ignore it
That will be like in 3 years from now lol
Sure some bf2sers will watch it this or next month.
protip: whatever Poseidon says, ignorePoseidon wrote:
protip: whatever war man tells you to do, ignore it
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.