more for jenspm (how the fuck do you imbed youtube now?)
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2011-05-02 15:33:15)
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2011-05-02 15:33:15)
I really don't know or care. They start burning flags and marching to the streets if someone here farts, guess they're just pissed off again.lowing wrote:
As I have said before, I take their word for it, if they tell me their actions are in the name of Islam, so be it.
I also asked but was ignored, if Bin Laden was so un-islamic, why are islamic leaders upset about how we disposed of his body?
sorry, don't understand the question or its context.13/f/taiwan wrote:
so lowing, you believe in terrorist...
gee ya think?Shocking wrote:
I really don't know or care. They start burning flags and marching to the streets if someone here farts, guess they're just pissed off again.lowing wrote:
As I have said before, I take their word for it, if they tell me their actions are in the name of Islam, so be it.
I also asked but was ignored, if Bin Laden was so un-islamic, why are islamic leaders upset about how we disposed of his body?
Well lowing, if there's two self professed muslims who both tell you contradictory things, then there's a problem.
[youtube] (link ) [/youtube]11 Bravo wrote:
more for jenspm (how the fuck do you imbed youtube now?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy1o5WYiGss
youtubehd11 Bravo wrote:
more for jenspm (how the fuck do you imbed youtube now?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy1o5WYiGss
As does the one who carries a message for peace. Up to you what you choose to believe in.lowing wrote:
gee ya think?
not really, I can believe them both, but odds are, the one who professes violence probably has the Koranic backing for it.
well ok i suck. tyIlocano wrote:
youtubehd11 Bravo wrote:
more for jenspm (how the fuck do you imbed youtube now?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy1o5WYiGss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy1o5WYiGss
and this why I judge each person, including Muslims by their actions and not by their religion. I judge their religion separately. As it is islam has plenty of references to justify the actions of the idiots. Including the actions of its founder himself.Shocking wrote:
As does the one who carries a message for peace. Up to you what you choose to believe in.lowing wrote:
gee ya think?
not really, I can believe them both, but odds are, the one who professes violence probably has the Koranic backing for it.
lowing he did not use a human shield...they just cleared that up due to fog of war reporting errorslowing wrote:
and this why I judge each person, including Muslims by their actions and not by their religion. I judge their religion separately. As it is islam has plenty of references to justify the actions of the idiots. Including the actions of its founder himself.Shocking wrote:
As does the one who carries a message for peace. Up to you what you choose to believe in.lowing wrote:
gee ya think?
not really, I can believe them both, but odds are, the one who professes violence probably has the Koranic backing for it.
well good, then the woman that got killed probably had it coming as well, I am happy no innocent people were taken out then.11 Bravo wrote:
lowing he did not use a human shield...they just cleared that up due to fog of war reporting errorslowing wrote:
and this why I judge each person, including Muslims by their actions and not by their religion. I judge their religion separately. As it is islam has plenty of references to justify the actions of the idiots. Including the actions of its founder himself.Shocking wrote:
As does the one who carries a message for peace. Up to you what you choose to believe in.
she was probably yawning, the bitch.SonderKommando wrote:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5226/568 … 593d_b.jpg
look at hilary's expression... Fuck I want to see the video so bad...
that is beyond fucking awesomeSonderKommando wrote:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5226/568 … 593d_b.jpg
look at hilary's expression... Fuck I want to see the video so bad...
Do you have a link for that 11? Anywho, if he had used her as a human shield, it would be purely due to Islamic teachings. I believe anyone in that house was probably not innocent regardless of shield use or not. How though does her not being used as a human shield mean she was not an innocent lowing? Maybe she was delivering some pineapple pizza?lowing wrote:
well good, then the woman that got killed probably had it coming as well, I am happy no innocent people were taken out then.11 Bravo wrote:
lowing he did not use a human shield...they just cleared that up due to fog of war reporting errorslowing wrote:
and this why I judge each person, including Muslims by their actions and not by their religion. I judge their religion separately. As it is islam has plenty of references to justify the actions of the idiots. Including the actions of its founder himself.
no link...just saw it on cnnNic wrote:
Do you have a link for that 11? Anywho, if he had used her as a human shield, it would be purely due to Islamic teachings. I believe anyone in that house was probably not innocent regardless of shield use or not. How though does her not being used as a human shield mean she was not an innocent lowing? Maybe she was delivering some pineapple pizza?lowing wrote:
well good, then the woman that got killed probably had it coming as well, I am happy no innocent people were taken out then.11 Bravo wrote:
lowing he did not use a human shield...they just cleared that up due to fog of war reporting errors
could be, I am just playing the odds and taking a wild guess.Nic wrote:
Do you have a link for that 11? Anywho, if he had used her as a human shield, it would be purely due to Islamic teachings. I believe anyone in that house was probably not innocent regardless of shield use or not. How though does her not being used as a human shield mean she was not an innocent lowing? Maybe she was delivering some pineapple pizza?lowing wrote:
well good, then the woman that got killed probably had it coming as well, I am happy no innocent people were taken out then.11 Bravo wrote:
lowing he did not use a human shield...they just cleared that up due to fog of war reporting errors
I don't know. Did he really hide behind the body of a woman, or is that just a final insult created by the US?Ty wrote:
Whether or not he hid behind a woman would speak more to the man's cowardice than any sort of policy he may have had anyway.
AussieReaper wrote:
I don't know. Did he really hide behind the body of a woman, or is that just a final insult created by the US?Ty wrote:
Whether or not he hid behind a woman would speak more to the man's cowardice than any sort of policy he may have had anyway.
We'll never really know. But it's a great that either way - he did, or we were told he did to make him look like a coward to any of his remaining supporters.
11 Bravo wrote:
lowing he did not use a human shield...they just cleared that up due to fog of war reporting errors