BF2S Forums Obama Press Conference: Bin Laden Is Dead

Shocking wrote:

lowing wrote:

Well as I said, it has been Islamic govt. policy. You asked for examples and I provided it. What more do you want?

I just told you that your examples are absolute bullshit. The stuff about Iran did not make sense, and you use dictators as if they're a benchmark for Islamic behavior of sorts.

So how do you explain Saladin, a figure who is actually revered in Islam for his actions? Doesn't really fit with your image does he?

I didn't write the article. so if you think it is bullshit tell the author. by the way, the president of Iran has also agreed to be a human shield at that plant as well.

I can not help it if Islamic govt. policy is set by dictators, it does not take away from the fact that Islamic govt. policy has been known to approve of human shields. I am sorry you don't like it, but it is well documented.

How do you explain Muhammad? A figure that is actually revered in Islam?  Can we not forget about both and stick to current events?

Last edited by lowing (2011-05-02 13:48:34)

yup, in denial. like i said before.

13/f/taiwan wrote:

why don't you provide some links that actually work instead of talking shite?

don't think I have talking shit, I have been respectful and courteous. and provide sources for my arguments.

Shocking wrote:

So every action of muslims or Islamic governments are, according to you, motivated through Islam?

If a christian takes a shit is that a christian shit?

lol, I dunno, you tell me.....ALl I observed was a high number of incidences where Islamic govts. resort to human shields.

I would suppose if a Christian takes a shit in the name of Christianity, then yeah it would be a Christian shit.

lowing wrote:

Shocking wrote:

So every action of muslims or Islamic governments are, according to you, motivated through Islam?

If a christian takes a shit is that a christian shit?

lol, I dunno, you tell me.....ALl I observed was a high number of incidences where Islamic govts. resort to human shields.

I would suppose if a Christian takes a shit in the name of Christianity, then yeah it would be a Christian shit.

None of these islamic governments have taken human shields "in the name of islam" though...

lowing wrote:

lol, I dunno, you tell me.....ALl I observed was a high number of incidences where Islamic govts. resort to human shields.

I would suppose if a Christian takes a shit in the name of Christianity, then yeah it would be a Christian shit.

You know I think it would be very healthy for you to go to the middle east on a vacation and see for yourself what sort of people they are. Chances are you'll be treated with respect, friendliness and hospitality; that's the treatment I received while touring through 5 different countries; Kazachstan, Kyrzygstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and muslim parts of China.

It's hard to put into words how incredibly wrong you are with your view on these people and their religion. Maybe just step into your local mosque and spout the shit at them that you do on this forum.

Shocking wrote:

lowing wrote:

lol, I dunno, you tell me.....ALl I observed was a high number of incidences where Islamic govts. resort to human shields.

I would suppose if a Christian takes a shit in the name of Christianity, then yeah it would be a Christian shit.

You know I think it would be very healthy for you to go to the middle east on a vacation and see for yourself what sort of people they are. Chances are you'll be treated with respect, friendliness and hospitality; that's the treatment I received while touring through 5 different countries; Kazachstan, Kyrzygstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and muslim parts of China.

It's hard to put into words how incredibly wrong you are with your view on these people and their religion. Maybe just step into your local mosque and spout the shit at them that you do on this forum.

No shocking, no. The actions of one equal the actions of all. As long as that one may follow Islam.
Actually this is not entirely true. If a woman in France says something it is also a true representation of what everyone in Europe thinks.

lowing wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

lowing wrote:

lol, I dunno, you tell me.....ALl I observed was a high number of incidences where Islamic govts. resort to human shields.

I would suppose if a Christian takes a shit in the name of Christianity, then yeah it would be a Christian shit.

None of these islamic governments have taken human shields "in the name of islam" though...

but they are Islamic govts. right? and a tactic found mostly within Islamic govts. right? Bin Laden was an Islamic leader of Al Queda right? Everything he did was in the name of Islam right? Hence "how very Islamic of him". If you want to get into semantics over it like everyone else fine. Fact is, this bullshit happens as part of Islamic govt tactics, just like I said.

I'm not denying they're muslim governments or that they're using human shields. I'm just saying it isn't done in the name of islam. Plenty of governments and armies have used similar tactics that have and havent been islamic.

presidentsheep wrote:

lowing wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

None of these islamic governments have taken human shields "in the name of islam" though...

but they are Islamic govts. right? and a tactic found mostly within Islamic govts. right? Bin Laden was an Islamic leader of Al Queda right? Everything he did was in the name of Islam right? Hence "how very Islamic of him". If you want to get into semantics over it like everyone else fine. Fact is, this bullshit happens as part of Islamic govt tactics, just like I said.

I'm not denying they're muslim governments or that they're using human shields. I'm just saying it isn't done in the name of islam. Plenty of governments and armies have used similar tactics that have and havent been islamic.

ok then, if you re not denying what I said is true, why are you arguing against it? Remember I did not say anything that included ALL MUSLIMS contrary to popular belief.

So why mention it at all? It's like saying one guy with a beard blew up some towers so therefore all people with beards blow up towers...

Shocking wrote:

lowing wrote:

but they are Islamic govts. right? and a tactic found mostly within Islamic govts. right? Bin Laden was an Islamic leader of Al Queda right? Everything he did was in the name of Islam right? Hence "how very Islamic of him". If you want to get into semantics over it like everyone else fine. Fact is, this bullshit happens as part of Islamic govt tactics, just like I said.

You said it was islamic to use human shields, it's as if you view the people who follow that religion as fucking sub human or something. And don't you deny it, that's very evident by the mountains of ridiculous claims you've put on this forum through the years.

Just because the damn name "Islamic" is pasted in front of the word "government" doesn't mean that every single action it takes is in the name of Islam. THAT is a ridiculous claim if I ever saw one.

Shocking, please don't fall for the old adage that if "someone says something often enough it becomes true".  In this case, the accusations that I have ever said anything that includes all Muslims.


and again what I said is true, this human shield bullshit is found in Islamic govts. No need to read into what I said beyond that fact.

Now, if you want a "feel good" story. I offer this... I love it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/0 … 05951.html

Last edited by lowing (2011-05-02 14:36:48)

presidentsheep wrote:

So why mention it at all? It's like saying one guy with a beard blew up some towers so therefore all people with beards blow up towers...

I said it because it is a true. What he did can be found in example all in Islamic countries policy.

Shocking wrote:

It's like saying that because the westboro baptist church exists it's christian to picket funerals.

If you wanna discuss Christian hypocrisy and bullshit as well we can, but I will speak of the religion, and not individual Christians. Just like I speak of Islam and not individual Muslims.