BF2S Forums About Barry "No Longer The Impostor" Obama

UnkleRukus wrote:

War Man wrote:

Say, where is that post of Haibai's burnzz on your sig

Anyway, Trump is winning my vote. A president who isn't afraid to drop the F-Bomb is good.

China, "Time to pay the money you borrowed from us, America"
President Trump, "Fuck you, we are not paying you back"

Whenever I feel you couldn't get any dumber, you say shit like this.

Ty wrote:

13rin wrote:

Ty wrote:

Wait, Obama's Austrian now?

Of course... it's so simple! It all makes sense now!

Euro response.... You guys really don't get US politics.

After more than five years here I thought it would be pretty clear that I'm not "Euro". If you mean 'non-American' then say it. Anyway it was a joke.

Hey I know you've got a new favourite term with "straw man" but you should maybe look up what that actually means before you come across as more of an idiot.

lol ty a euro. i think we can mistaken you for welsh for the whole sheep thing

Ty wrote:

lowing wrote:

If you condemn Palin  for having LITTLE experience in the private sector, then you must, by default, condemn Obama even more for having NO experience in the private sector. He graduated with a law degree, yet never practiced law and EXCELLED through the ranks to the office of president. His resume is claimed to be a fraud, ( i am not saying it, I have no idea if it is or isn't) by people who know him and work with him. He is known to have kept circles with felons and unscrupulous people.
Their are no such distractions with Palin, so the left must bash her wardrobe, her daughter, etc and claim anyone that bashes Obama is racist. Sorry, but the chips against Obama stack higher than Palin.

Oh and by the way "how it got to this" was I made a comment that Palin at least had a job before she became a national figure. Kinda set off a firestorm with posts trying to convince me that Obama had one as well. Very very defensive about their "transparent" superman

I don't condemn her, I'm saying that you're putting so much of your argument on the strength of her experience in the private sector when she amounted to little more than a fishwife. What's with the focus on the private sector anyway? What I've said twice and what you've yet to counter me on is that the office of President is a public office. Back to Palin; sure she was 'attacked' for her wardrobe - but that was less to do with Palin and more to do with the fact that she's a woman and the media loves to concentrate on irrellevent details like what she's wearing. The did it with Hillary's pant-suits as well. As to her daughter, I'd say that was an issue because of Palin's stance on abstinence and it was considered a contradiction when her daughter became an unwed teenage mother. Make sweeping judgements on the morality of others and you're going to find that it may bite you in the arse. The rest of the criticism was linked to the fact that through her own actions during the campaign she showed herself to be completely unsuitable for a role in top-level federal politics.

Now I would agree that the race card gets played by Obama's supporters but it's certainly not played as much as some think it is. I've got to be honest, the people I see using it most is the less-than-intelligent critics of Obama who when spouting some incorrect piece of trivia and being subsequently shut down immediately go on the defensive by claiming that "you're just attacking my criticism because you think I'm being racist".

Also, you keep saying Obama has been propped up his entire life. Aside from being selected by his party for candidacy, (which is part of the electoral process,) where else is this in play? Also, how does this differ from Palin being 'propped up' by the Republican party picking her for McCain's running mate? She certainly made a respectable reality TV career out of it for herself.

Why the focus on the private sector? Because it is there that the people earn a living and live their lives. A president that has never been there or worked for a living for anyone and considers the private sector as the enemy is not the most effective man for the job in a capitalist society.

You call her a fishwife, pretty much as an insult. I see her and her husband as working and making an honest living for themselves and their family just like the rest of the people the president is supposed to represent. Obama has not worked a day in his life, he has always been a leader, yet has no leadership background to build a foundation of leadership around. He has been given this presidency, like every other position in his life, and has not work for or earned any of it.... Again. A nobel prize for "hope", is the perfect latest example of this.

Well when it started with, not voting for Obama is racist, you tell me where Obama critics have not been considered racist.

Last edited by lowing (2011-04-30 01:57:59)

lowing wrote:

[Why the focus on the private sector? Because it is there that the people earn a living and live their lives. A president that has never been there or worked for a living for anyone and considers the private sector as the enemy is not the most effective man for the job in a capitalist society.

You call her a fishwife, pretty much as an insult. I see her and her husband as working and making an honest living for themselves and their family just like the rest of the people the president is supposed to represent. Obama has not worked a day in his life, he has always been a leader, yet has no leadership background to build a foundation of leadership around. He has been given this presidency, like every other position in his life, and has not work for or earned any of it.... Again. A nobel prize for "hope", is the perfect latest example of this.

Well when it started with, not voting for Obama is racist, you tell me where Obama critics have not been considered racist.

Wait, what? Is this why you think Obama's never worked for a living? Because he worked predominantly in the public sector? So I suppose while Palin was a city councillor a mayor and a Governor she wasn't working a job either - these positions are in the public sector. The public sector is no less legitimate that the private sector, people work in them to earn their living, many make careers for themselves in the public sector. It's not volunteer work you know, it is actual employment. My father works in the public sector.

"Obama has not worked a day in his life"... Look I have no idea how you can back up this claim. I see no point arguing on this point with you because if this is in fact what you believe despite plenty of evidence to the contrary then it'll be no more than wasted words.

You say he's always been a leader but never had any leadership background. This is a massive contradiction on your part. It doesn't even make sense. How can he not have had a foundation of leadership if he has, as you say, always been a leader? That's the very definition of a foundation of leadership.

Now I can agree with you on one thing you wrote - the Nobel Peace Prize was considerably undeserved. No idea why he got that. Must've been a slow year. Still, what do you do when you're awarded a Nobel Prize, decline it?

Finally the race thing. Like I said it gets played a bit. To the extent of "You're racist if you don't vote for Obama"... Well I've never seen any evidence of that but this kind of crap does seem to be said by some idiots. It hardly reflects the opinion of the majority Obama supporters though, c'mon, that's like saying everyone who doesn't support him think he's a Muslim sleeper agent. You want an example, how about here? Bf2s has its Obama supporters, its Obama critics and those who try to stay neutral. I'm not around D+ST all the time but I can't recall anyone playing the "if you don't support Obama you're racist" card short of jesting about it.

Ty wrote:

lowing wrote:

[Why the focus on the private sector? Because it is there that the people earn a living and live their lives. A president that has never been there or worked for a living for anyone and considers the private sector as the enemy is not the most effective man for the job in a capitalist society.

You call her a fishwife, pretty much as an insult. I see her and her husband as working and making an honest living for themselves and their family just like the rest of the people the president is supposed to represent. Obama has not worked a day in his life, he has always been a leader, yet has no leadership background to build a foundation of leadership around. He has been given this presidency, like every other position in his life, and has not work for or earned any of it.... Again. A nobel prize for "hope", is the perfect latest example of this.

Well when it started with, not voting for Obama is racist, you tell me where Obama critics have not been considered racist.

Wait, what? Is this why you think Obama's never worked for a living? Because he worked predominantly in the public sector? So I suppose while Palin was a city councillor a mayor and a Governor she wasn't working a job either - these positions are in the public sector. The public sector is no less legitimate that the private sector, people work in them to earn their living, many make careers for themselves in the public sector. It's not volunteer work you know, it is actual employment. My father works in the public sector.

"Obama has not worked a day in his life"... Look I have no idea how you can back up this claim. I see no point arguing on this point with you because if this is in fact what you believe despite plenty of evidence to the contrary then it'll be no more than wasted words.

You say he's always been a leader but never had any leadership background. This is a massive contradiction on your part. It doesn't even make sense. How can he not have had a foundation of leadership if he has, as you say, always been a leader? That's the very definition of a foundation of leadership.

Now I can agree with you on one thing you wrote - the Nobel Peace Prize was considerably undeserved. No idea why he got that. Must've been a slow year. Still, what do you do when you're awarded a Nobel Prize, decline it?

Finally the race thing. Like I said it gets played a bit. To the extent of "You're racist if you don't vote for Obama"... Well I've never seen any evidence of that but this kind of crap does seem to be said by some idiots. It hardly reflects the opinion of the majority Obama supporters though, c'mon, that's like saying everyone who doesn't support him think he's a Muslim sleeper agent. You want an example, how about here? Bf2s has its Obama supporters, its Obama critics and those who try to stay neutral. I'm not around D+ST all the time but I can't recall anyone playing the "if you don't support Obama you're racist" card short of jesting about it.

1. I said, Obama thinks the private sector is the enemy. Not good for the president of a capitalist country. I said, he has never earned anything he has gotten. how do you become a teacher of law, when you have never been a lawyer? H,e has not worked for anything that has been given to him INCLUDING a nobel prize. Palin's roots are more down to earth with the rest of our society as part of the working class, which Obama has never been. Also while we are at it, how is it working for the public sector is just as legit as working in the private sector, unless it is me, and then of course it is welfare? You all in the BF2S brain trust really need to come up with constant on this issue.

2. What jobs has Obama applied for? What was his background and practical experience that made him qualified for anything?

3. You can be in a leadership roll, without being a leader Ty, ever have a shitty boss? or heard of one? Being in a leadership roll without practical experience at being a leader, does not make you a leader. It merely means you have risen to the level of your incompetence.

4. yes......especially since getting one for nothing kinda dilutes the meaning of the prize.

5. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-tod … ure-racist

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/olbermann-as … as-racist/

so again, on what issue, please name JUST ONE, where a criticism of Obama was not countered with accusations of racism?

Shocking wrote:

No one here is accusing you of racism so stop victimizing yourself

What is it with your obsession with making every discussion about me? Go back and read what has been posted. This is about Obama.


Anyway since you broach the subject, I can probably name more people that have accused me of racism in this forum than haven't. Even so, that hardly means I am "victimizing myself."

someone here really loves basking in the center of attention and then acts as though he is annoyed.  a lot like palin.

That was his original name. He changed his name so as to make it cooler.

taken already   

He changed his pronunciation of his first name or something like that.

Reciprocity wrote:

lowing wrote:

Palin's roots are more down to earth with the rest of our society as part of the working class, which Obama has never been.

lol.

other than "lol" would care to elaborate on how what I said is wrong?

Reciprocity wrote:

lowing wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

lol.

other than "lol" would care to elaborate on how what I said is wrong?

it's just funny that conservatives are back to wanting their president to be some kind of drinking buddy.  Or in Palin's case, some kind of conservative male's sexual object.  She was a news reader?  blowjob-giving ballast on a fishing boat?  mayor of a tiny shithole meth town?  Governor of the biggest welfare state in the union, who fucking quit?  And she's eminently qualified to be president?

I don't want a "drinking buddy". I want a leader that actually believes in the constitution, I want a leader that recognizes that great things happen when govt. gets the fuck out of the way and allows the people to innovate and create. How is it you can say that about Palin, and have none of the same criticisms for Obama? What has he done to earn any position he has been placed in? Palin has no controversies like falsified resumes, felon friends, or shady backstage deals. The biggest things the left has been able to criticize is her wardrobe and her kids.