no. they blew that black guys shit up, which delayed it until 2011pirana6 wrote:
August 29, 1997?
I think we're okay...
duh
duh
Spamtheban wrote:
no. they blew that black guys president's shit up, which delayed it until 2011pirana6 wrote:
August 29, 1997?
I think we're okay...
duh
Sturgeon wrote:
Spamtheban wrote:
no. they blew that black guys president's shit up, which delayed it until 2011pirana6 wrote:
August 29, 1997?
I think we're okay...
duh
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
winningROGUEDD wrote:
Sturgeon wrote:
Spamtheban wrote:
no. they blew that black guys president's shit up, which delayed it until 2011
duh
I work with a president named dyson.. lel.. I always want to call him Miles.
i give you a bigUltrafunkula wrote:
Pos, where the hell did you get such wrong info on the date?
http://terminator.wikia.com/wiki/Judgment_DayCameron tells Sarah that Judgment Day is now set to occur on April 21, 2011. Skynet is destined to go online a few days earlier, 20:11 on April 19, 2011
You can thank Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles for that one.
Why is this even an issue? Terminator is up to its asshole in time travel and paradox. The moment you allow your fictional universe to modify past events to alter the future, cohesion is tenuous at best.
whos this joker ruining the thread
Have you ever watched the movie Primer?unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Why is this even an issue? Terminator is up to its asshole in time travel and paradox. The moment you allow your fictional universe to modify past events to alter the future, cohesion is tenuous at best.
I never see any up-to-date/interesting ads for anything, they just have these BET awards ads from like 3 months ago.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
according to these ads I've seen on the Metro and buses, it's May 21.
Same thing with Star Trek. Take the new one:Spamtheban wrote:
whos this joker ruining the thread
Now there's Terminator. Every time Skynet or the resistance dicks around with the past, something changes. Assigning any value at all to any dates described by a cannon film of tv show is setting yourself up for nerd heartbreak when it's completely undone later on.1) Crazy Romulan follows Spock into the past and blows shit up, creating an alternative future.
2) We'll allow for the possibility of an independent timeline, as not to invalidate both Spock and crazy Romulan's time travel.
solution a) Next movie: Spock goes back into the future (which we know you can do in Star Trek) and arranges for crazy Romulan to be killed.
solution b) Next movie: Spock goes back into the future and presents evidence that the star will go supernova sooner than expected, thus saving billions of lives in the Romulan star system in the future and billions of lives in the past that were wiped out by crazy Romulan guy, and trillions of future lives snuffed out by said time travel atrocities.
result: movie 1 completely invalidated by movie 2, which is also within Star Trek physics constraints.
Instead, watch this:
wtf. You can't go "back to the future" once you've altered the timeline.
Otherwise the future you go to is the future of the altered timeline and not your original.
It's all explained in that movie, Back to the Future.
Otherwise the future you go to is the future of the altered timeline and not your original.
It's all explained in that movie, Back to the Future.
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Good movie, but lots of questions raised.AussieReaper wrote:
wtf. You can't go "back to the future" once you've altered the timeline.
Otherwise the future you go to is the future of the altered timeline and not your original.
It's all explained in that movie, Back to the Future.
All I'm saying is that if overused or examined too closely, time travel obfuscates a show's logical sequence of events.
Yeah. There's a great line in Austin Powers where the 3rd wall is broken and the audience is told not too look to closely at the complications of time travel. lolunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Good movie, but lots of questions raised.AussieReaper wrote:
wtf. You can't go "back to the future" once you've altered the timeline.
Otherwise the future you go to is the future of the altered timeline and not your original.
It's all explained in that movie, Back to the Future.
All I'm saying is that if overused or examined too closely, time travel obfuscates a show's logical sequence of events.
But you should def watch Primer.
TimecopAussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. There's a great line in Austin Powers where the 3rd wall is broken and the audience is told not too look to closely at the complications of time travel. lolunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Good movie, but lots of questions raised.AussieReaper wrote:
wtf. You can't go "back to the future" once you've altered the timeline.
Otherwise the future you go to is the future of the altered timeline and not your original.
It's all explained in that movie, Back to the Future.
All I'm saying is that if overused or examined too closely, time travel obfuscates a show's logical sequence of events.
But you should def watch Primer.
MVA cuz there is not just one universe but a multiverse. The One movie says so.Ultrafunkula wrote:
TimecopAussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. There's a great line in Austin Powers where the 3rd wall is broken and the audience is told not too look to closely at the complications of time travel. lolunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Good movie, but lots of questions raised.
All I'm saying is that if overused or examined too closely, time travel obfuscates a show's logical sequence of events.
But you should def watch Primer.
Last day on earth? ... anybody for some buttseks?
*crickets*
That was such a good movie. MUST.GET.STRONGER!loubot wrote:
MVA cuz there is not just one universe but a multiverse. The One movie says so.Ultrafunkula wrote:
TimecopAussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. There's a great line in Austin Powers where the 3rd wall is broken and the audience is told not too look to closely at the complications of time travel. lol
But you should def watch Primer.
