It's true that not everyone watches 'good' movies and even when they do most of the people don't get all the hints and/or metaphors a director puts in it or the strong and weak points in the performance of an actor.Uzique wrote:
i just skip through 99.99999% of people's posts here because they are a) incredibly stupid b) astoundingly lacking in taste and c) probably black
It's true, but if I wanted to know all the ins and outs about a good movie I would read what a real critic would have to say about it and not go to this thread. i mean, come on, did you honestly expect that most reviews here would be that of a proefessional standard? No, of course not. You don't have to read them or agree with them, just don't expect too much of what's posted here.Uzique wrote:
i disagree.
most 'good' films are made to be watched by film critics and aware viewers - not your average joe just there for entertainment.
a good film critic can highlight many excellent things about a film that a weekend cinema-goer can not.
I rate your comment lowUzique wrote:
all im saying is stop putting numerical ratings because you're dumb and it's annoying
that's all im saying
I can live with thatUzique wrote:
all im saying is stop putting numerical ratings because you're dumb and it's annoying
that's all im saying
just ignore the numerical ratings if you disagree with them, is it that hard?Uzique wrote:
all im saying is stop putting numerical ratings because you're dumb and it's annoying
that's all im saying
Uzique wrote:
pipe down
obsessed with structure and purpose?Pug wrote:
I rate your comment lowUzique wrote:
all im saying is stop putting numerical ratings because you're dumb and it's annoying
that's all im saying
Obsessed with structure/purpose for life = you
Well, a good movie discussion is always welcome, but not if it's based on the arguments that the reviewer is being dumb and annoying for expressing his opinion.Trotskygrad wrote:
just ignore the numerical ratings if you disagree with them, is it that hard?Uzique wrote:
all im saying is stop putting numerical ratings because you're dumb and it's annoying
that's all im saying
oley bullshitUzique wrote:
aesthesis, not theoria
no they're not welcomeKampframmer wrote:
Well, a good movie discussion is always welcome, but not if it's based on the arguments that the reviewer is being dumb and annoying for expressing his opinion.Trotskygrad wrote:
just ignore the numerical ratings if you disagree with them, is it that hard?Uzique wrote:
all im saying is stop putting numerical ratings because you're dumb and it's annoying
that's all im saying
Rate the last movie you've seenUzique wrote:
no they're not welcomeKampframmer wrote:
Well, a good movie discussion is always welcome, but not if it's based on the arguments that the reviewer is being dumb and annoying for expressing his opinion.Trotskygrad wrote:
just ignore the numerical ratings if you disagree with them, is it that hard?
just stop rating films, it's arbitrary
i'd find you pissing into some tealeaves more enlightening
Kampframmer wrote:
Rate the last movie you've seenUzique wrote:
no they're not welcomeKampframmer wrote:
Well, a good movie discussion is always welcome, but not if it's based on the arguments that the reviewer is being dumb and annoying for expressing his opinion.
just stop rating films, it's arbitrary
i'd find you pissing into some tealeaves more enlightening
I've never played it, but please continue your relations with the sandpaper.jord wrote:
Limitless must be one to avoid then if ya think far cry 2 was a good game.
Last edited by M.O.A.B (2011-03-25 07:56:14)
Uhh, educated or not, any rating assigned is wholly subjective.Uzique wrote:
lets just abandon rating systems altogether because i mean, not many people here are film buffs so their attempts at quantifying their misinformed, uneducated and sentimentally misguided reactions to the films are completely futile and wholly arbitrary, anyway.
Last edited by Jay (2011-03-25 08:01:57)
