BF2S Forums This is the true Europe

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ahhh Aussie, the Queen of Denial. I didn't write the article Aussie. If you read it, you would see it is a ever growing concern in Europe and it just got worse.

Holy shit, I read that article and you are 100% correct. Sorry to have doubted you mate.

I've been reading up on the steady flow of immigrants into Europe. Especially those coming from Africa.

Take a look at this:

Homo erectus first migrated out of Africa over the Levantine corridor and Horn of Africa to Eurasia about 1.8 million years ago, a migration probably sparked by the development of language. The expansion of H. erectus out of Africa was followed by that of Homo antecessor into Europe around 800,000 years ago, followed by Homo heidelbergensis around 600,000 years ago, where they probably evolved to become the Neanderthals.

H. sapiens reached Europe around 40,000 years ago, eventually replacing the Neanderthal population. East Asia was reached by 30,000 years ago.

The date of migration to North America is disputed; it may have taken place around 30 millennia ago, or considerably later, around 14 millennia ago.


Can you believe the outrage? First Europeans have to deal with Homo erectus, a million years later the Homo antecessor! And, bloody Homo heidelbergensis 200,000 years after decided to swarm into Europe!

Then we come to the real bastards, Homo sapiens! We're still dealing with those homo's since they kicked out the Neanderthals. Bloody racists!

Here it is illustrated:

http://img852.imageshack.us/img852/8528 … osapie.png

1. Homo sapiens
2. Neanderthals
3. Early Hominids

For tens of thousands of years the steady flow of Homo sapiens has plagued Europe. Never content with what they had.

Here is a poor Homo Erectus

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/4802 … rectus.jpg

Not much chance of staying in Europe after those other homos moved in. But Europe just seems to keep having to deal with these invaders time and time again!


I thought we were safe after Homo sapiens moved into the Middle East (where they belong!) about 70 millennia ago.

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/3963/redsea2.png

But no, then this happened. Civilization!

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9450 … ge3750.pnghttp://img339.imageshack.us/img339/2486 … ge3500.pnghttp://img339.imageshack.us/img339/2955 … ge3250.pnghttp://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1582 … ge3000.png

This is when our other invader was finally seen off, the Neanderthals. But at what cost? Homo sapiens to replace them? I don't think so. All of Europe is in a terrible state of affairs, and his been for decades. Possibly longer.

Is there anything we can do to stop the tide? Before long, Europe will be doom to be swamped with Homo Sapiens forever!

What do you suggest lowing? Can we build some kind of wall to keep out the Homo sapiens?

lowing wrote:

while maintaining this persona of, life is sacred, we are all human beings, we are all in this together, and we are compassionate and understanding

While we were greeted with open arms, I could not help but think how most of these people would wind up filing police reports in parts of the states.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-03-21 05:33:05)

FEOS wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Who says Europe has ever had a liberal immigration policy?
Socialism is for citizens, not non-citizens.

Peter, Paul and Mary were American folk singers.

This pretty much. Being allowed into Europe legally is incredibly difficult.

Then why the outcry when the US tries to limit illegal immigration for the same reasons?

ghettoperson wrote:

FEOS wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

This pretty much. Being allowed into Europe legally is incredibly difficult.

Then why the outcry when the US tries to limit illegal immigration for the same reasons?

What outcry? You won't here me complaining about it. I can't really imagine any reasonable people saying that illegal immigration is perfectly ok. Perhaps they might want a loosening of immigration policies, but I'd think that's as far as they'd go.

lowing wrote:

Uzique wrote:

aussie that is literally amazing.

lowing what is wrong with having immigration control? it hardly violates humanist/liberal beliefs. enough is enough, sometimes, surely.

plus you're quoting LE PEN. not europe. LE PEN.

L E  P E N

go wikipedia that

nothing wrong with immigration control. I see it as some what hypocritical though, to emulate a persona of humanist, ever accepting, and yet actually cast immigrant adrift in boats to keep them out.

lowing wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Le Pen focuses on immigration to France, the European Union, traditional culture, law and order and France's high rate of unemployment. He advocates immigration restrictions, the death penalty, raising incentives for homemakers,[1] and euroscepticism. He strongly opposes same-sex marriage, euthanasia, and abortion.

He advocates immigration restrictions, the death penalty, raising incentives for homemakers,[1] and euroscepticism

He advocates immigration restrictions, the death penalty, and euroscepticism

He advocates immigration restrictions, euroscepticism

euroscepticism

now you're using this french nationalist politician as a representation of THE ENTIRE OF EUROPE'S liberalism and 'socialist decline'?

no not really. Unless of course he penned all the articles listed in google covering the topic.

lowing wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Then why the outcry when the US tries to limit illegal immigration for the same reasons?

What outcry? You won't here me complaining about it. I can't really imagine any reasonable people saying that illegal immigration is perfectly ok. Perhaps they might want a loosening of immigration policies, but I'd think that's as far as they'd go.

coulda swore I remember reading accusations of racism and intolerance and shit when the suggestion of rounding up illegals and throwing them the fuck out was mentioned. Also don't recall much support from EU posters regarding newly adopted Arizona state laws. Am I wrong about that?

would make the failure to carry immigration documents a crime and give the police broad power to detain anyone suspected of being in the country illegally

Uzique wrote:

lowing wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Le Pen focuses on immigration to France, the European Union, traditional culture, law and order and France's high rate of unemployment. He advocates immigration restrictions, the death penalty, raising incentives for homemakers,[1] and euroscepticism. He strongly opposes same-sex marriage, euthanasia, and abortion.

He advocates immigration restrictions, the death penalty, raising incentives for homemakers,[1] and euroscepticism

He advocates immigration restrictions, the death penalty, and euroscepticism

He advocates immigration restrictions, euroscepticism

now you're using this french nationalist politician as a representation of THE ENTIRE OF EUROPE'S liberalism and 'socialist decline'?

no not really. Unless of course he penned all the articles listed in google covering the topic.

i suppose you've read all the thousands of articles that google can fetch which celebrate socialism and applaud the quality of living in europe, too, then?

lowing wrote:

Uzique wrote:

lowing wrote:

no not really. Unless of course he penned all the articles listed in google covering the topic.

i suppose you've read all the thousands of articles that google can fetch which celebrate socialism and applaud the quality of living in europe, too, then?

I dunno can you? link me to such current articles will ya? Link me to how socialism is thriving in Europe. Remember, Scandinavia is not ALL OF EUROPE