Varegg wrote:
lowing wrote:
Varegg wrote:
As soon as it is on the internet it litterally is the exact same thing ...
^^^^^^^Here it is again.....what did I miss?!^^^^^^^^
You claim the internet and personal interaction is exactly the same thing "LITERALLY". I called bullshit on that opinion, and gave an example as to how and why it is bullshit.
Now, if I "missed something", by all means enlighten me on this point.
You know what situational means lowing? ... did you miss that I threw that word around in LITERALLY all posts in this thread ... are you a fucking idiot or is your comprehension totally lacking?
One last try
*Telling a tsunami joke online equals telling it directly to the victims ... and in the light of past days events totally tasteless ...
*Telling a cancerjoke online equals telling it directly to the victims but hardly as grave and prolly not taken nearly as serious as a tsunami joke ...
Again I stress the point that it is S I T U A T I O N A L
I am well aware of what situational means. Hence Kmar's reference to "fictious respect". You will show respect to their face, but laugh at the joke behind their backs. That is situational.
What my point was, was a direct challenge to your assertion that the internet is the same thing as personal interaction.
Telling a tsunami joke directly to the face of a father who lost their daughter, IE directed specifically at HIM and his loss, in the tsunami IS NOT the same thing as listening to a joke over the internet directed at an event and not a specific person.