well according to Islam it is a peceful and tolerant religion also, full of serenity and equality....Wanna argue that it is? really?Shocking wrote:
I wasn't the one who asked for those quotes, as I don't believe they're relevant to the discussion - there are as many interpretations of religious texts as there are followers of that particular religion.lowing wrote:
Argument was his Islamic culture allows for this. That is a fact.
You asked for quotes from Islam that supported this behavior, they were provided, now you say it doesn't count?
Then the argument becomes some tribes in Afghanistan dos this shit as well, Irrelevant. Somehow I guess this is supposed to excuse Islamic cultures for doing it.
Islam is the problem child religion in the world today, not Christianity, or Hindus, or the fuckin Buddhists. Islam. That is also a fact.
There is simply no amount of redirection, denial, dismissal, or insults that is going to change any of those facts.
Which is also why I feel your definition of "Islamic culture" is wrong, it's difficult to try and isolate a point of cultural unity among muslims - as they can disagree on what Islam's teachings supposedly are, and how to follow them.
Because, I assume, you're talking radical Islam, quoting this excerpt from Sharia law concerning divorce would suit the discussion;Nowhere does it state that it's OK to kill or even behead your wife in the process of a divorce or after it. Sharia allows domestic violence, hell, even beating of women in case of "rebellion" but something like this is not condoned. So don't label it as if it were.Sharia wrote:
Divorce
The laws governing divorce vary substantially between sects, schools, states and cultures. The following outline is general in nature.
A marriage can be terminated by the husband in the talaq process, or by the wife seeking divorce through khul'. Under faskh a marriage may be annulled or terminated by the qadi judge.
Men have the right of unilateral divorce under classical Sharia. A Sunni Muslim divorce is effective when the man tells his wife that he is divorcing her, however a Shia divorce also requires four witnesses.[96] Upon divorce, the husband must pay the wife any delayed component of the dower. If a man divorces his wife in this manner three times, he may not re-marry her unless she first marries, and is subsequently divorced from, another man. Only then, and only if the divorce from the second husband is not intended as a means to re-marry her first husband, may the first husband and the woman re-marry.[Qur'an 2:230]
In practice, unilateral divorce is only common in a few areas of the Islamic world. It is much more common for divorces to be accomplished by mutual consent.[96]
If the wife asks for a divorce and the husband refuses, the wife has a right, under classical Sharia, to divorce by khul'. Although this right is not recognized everywhere in Islam, it is becoming more common. In this scenario, the qadi judge will effect the divorce for the wife, and she may be required to return part, or all, of her dowry.[96]
Under faskh, a qadi judge can end or annul a marriage.[96] Apostasy, on the part of the husband or wife, ends a Muslim marriage in this way. Hardship or suffering on the part of the wife in a marriage may also be remedied in this way. This procedure is also used to annul a marriage in which one of the parties has a serious disability.[97]
Except in the case of a khul' divorce initiated by a woman, the divorced wife generally keeps her dowry from when she was married. A divorced woman is given child support until the age of weaning. The mother is usually granted custody of the child.[98] If the couple has divorced fewer than three times (meaning it is not a final divorce) the wife also receives spousal support for three menstrual cycles after the divorce, until it can be determined whether she is pregnant. Even in a threefold divorce, a pregnant wife will be supported during the waiting period, and the child will be supported afterwards.[99]
Yes, there are many glaring issues with radical Islamic culture, but even there you can't simply behead your wife and expect to get away with it.
oh and here their view on murder;So yeah, some islamic cultures are fucked up because sharia is, but come on, it's a ridiculous claim to say that beheading your wife is condoned.Sharia wrote:
Murder
Sharia law for murder allows the death penalty, but is kinder than western law in one respect - after judicial judgement has been made, appeals are then allowed to the family of the murdered victims, and they are begged to be merciful. In Islam, it is always regarded as the height of mercy to forgive a murderer, even though one may have the right to take his/her life in reprisal.
The form of execution is not specified in Islam - i.e. it is not usually a stoning. Beheading used to be regarded as the quickest and most merciful way (as in Roman law, and the French guillotine); these days other methods may find approval. There are apparently far fewer executions in most Muslim countries than in the USA, for example. The penalty for adultery is open to debate. Most scholars will insist that the penalty as laid down in the Qur'an was 100 lashes, and there were various rules for regulating how lashes were to be given too. Other scholars maintain that the old penalty for adultery as laid down by the previous prophets was stoning (as in the Old Testament). By New Testament times, the prophet Jesus had the famous case where a guilty woman was forgiven and sent away, told only to sin no more.
In some Muslim societies, judges and populaces might stone out of mistaken belief that this was what Islam required. In fact, Islam made it virtually impossible - to be sentenced to death for adultery, the couple had to be actually witnessed performing the physical act by four people who were in a position to identify both parties without doubt; this virtually ruled out the penalty, since adultery is taken for granted as a secret act and something not done in public.
Lowing, is this a rant against Islam, or a rant against all religion?
http://www.islam-watch.org/SyedKamranMi … illing.htmVaregg wrote:
It's actually not accepted by the majority of Islam, it's accepted by a very few ... and those few are the ones you constantly hear about, you simply can't judge the masses for the actions of the few ... how is that being an ass about it?11 Bravo wrote:
no...thats just stupid and you being an ass about it. its accepted in the majortiy of islamic cultures. not sure how anyone can argue that.Varegg wrote:
According to lowing chain of thought you do ... one tolerates the actions of ones friends and Saudi is your friend ...
See if you can't get past the source and address the information. I dare you. Especially scroll down and read the "conclusion. By the way this was written by a Muslim.
I know I know, if you didn't attack the source you wouldn't have an argument, but give it a try anyway.
It is a rant against the only major religion treading on western society that holds values and morality that is 180 out from western society's progress in those areas.AussieReaper wrote:
Lowing, is this a rant against Islam, or a rant against all religion?
When Buddhists start doing this shit, you can bet your ass I will have something to say about it.
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-11 04:52:08)
Thats because if it is not a reliable or unbiased source, the information contained in it is most likely twisted or altered to suit the goals of the publisher. When in doubt, throw it out. If you were able to find your information at reliable sources, people wouldnt be able to attack the source. But you cant find it at a reliable source for a reason.
All your saying in the above post is "I know the information is flawed, but lets act like it's not, so that my argument is right."
All your saying in the above post is "I know the information is flawed, but lets act like it's not, so that my argument is right."
For this board the source is flawed because they disagree with the info... If the info is wrong, show me where. If the source is flawed, show me why. Can you offer more than, "because I said so"?Nic wrote:
Thats because if it is not a reliable or unbiased source, the information contained in it is most likely twisted or altered to suit the goals of the publisher. When in doubt, throw it out. If you were able to find your information at reliable sources, people wouldnt be able to attack the source. But you cant find it at a reliable source for a reason.
All your saying in the above post is "I know the information is flawed, but lets act like it's not, so that my argument is right."
THe article was written by a Muslim. If the article were posted on another site, does that make it more or less valid. Get over yourself, read what is written and address it.
The second you find an unbiased source that has a specific opinion on any issue, you let me know.
The second you find an unbiased pro life site or an unbiased pro choice site, let me know.
They have an argument, most argument are biased (kinda the nature of having an argument). To say the argument is biased hence wrong is pretty fuckin ridiculous. So again, argue against the article and forget which site posted it.
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-11 05:04:59)
^^ It's because the source you link to is as biased as they come, not because we disagree on the content ...
And you obviously didn't notice this little piece of information at the top? "Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims"
It's a hate site ... and thus cannot be used as viable information to prove a point ...
And you obviously didn't notice this little piece of information at the top? "Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims"
It's a hate site ... and thus cannot be used as viable information to prove a point ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
lol, jesus christ.Varegg wrote:
^^ It's because the source you link to is as biased as they come, not because we disagree on the content ...
And you obviously didn't notice this little piece of information at the top? "Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims"
It's a hate site ... and thus cannot be used as viable information to prove a point ...
what wouldn't be a "hate site" in your eyes that argued against supposed Islamic tolerance, peace, serenity and equality? Fact is, you can not argue against the info so you argue against the source. If you had an argument against the info, you surely would have posted it. Especially after countless challenges for you to do so. File this under "dismissal"
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-11 05:22:54)
I'm not arguing against the content on that website lowing, honorkillings do excist and nobody in this thread doubts that ... the difference is that you use that hatesite as proof that all of Islam supports honorkillings when they don't ...
A website that contains both sides of an issue giving a broader picture is usually a better source ...
And I would really want you to comment on the fact that the website is written by an ex-Muslim and not a Muslim like you pointed out ... seems like you have a habbit of confusing fact and fiction ...
A website that contains both sides of an issue giving a broader picture is usually a better source ...
And I would really want you to comment on the fact that the website is written by an ex-Muslim and not a Muslim like you pointed out ... seems like you have a habbit of confusing fact and fiction ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
No, I won't - I believe almost any religion, including Islam, gives people the opportunity to justify any action thanks to the multitudes of contradictions within religious texts. In the end it really is just a tool, and it's up to the individual to decide on how to use his religion.lowing wrote:
well according to Islam it is a peceful and tolerant religion also, full of serenity and equality....Wanna argue that it is? really?
Granted, indoctrination plays a big part in it, that's why extremist views exist in the first place. The real issue is; how would you go about solving that?
inane little opines
They are condoned in Islamic nations. IE Islamic govts. recognize them. I never said nor claimed EVERY Muslim in the world does. So stop with trying to claim I did, for you to argue against.Varegg wrote:
I'm not arguing against the content on that website lowing, honorkillings do excist and nobody in this thread doubts that ... the difference is that you use that hatesite as proof that all of Islam supports honorkillings when they don't ...
A website that contains both sides of an issue giving a broader picture is usually a better source ...
And I would really want you to comment on the fact that the website is written by an ex-Muslim and not a Muslim like you pointed out ... seems like you have a habbit of confusing fact and fiction ...
Don't judge the Muslims that you know by Islam and don't judge Islam by the Muslims that you know.
Does this satisfy you?^^^^^^^ Is that a better statement?
THe fact that they are EX- Muslims gives them more credibility does it not? They are EX for a reason and they clearly spell out the reasons in the articles? How can you dismiss them?
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-11 18:08:06)
you are correct, any religion is like this, however it is Islam today, that is the global ass pain not Hindus or who ever else you want to fill in the blank with..Shocking wrote:
No, I won't - I believe almost any religion, including Islam, gives people the opportunity to justify any action thanks to the multitudes of contradictions within religious texts. In the end it really is just a tool, and it's up to the individual to decide on how to use his religion.lowing wrote:
well according to Islam it is a peceful and tolerant religion also, full of serenity and equality....Wanna argue that it is? really?
Granted, indoctrination plays a big part in it, that's why extremist views exist in the first place. The real issue is; how would you go about solving that?
Not my problem to solve. It is the Muslims who feel their religion has been hijacked to solve.
The way it is however is, they only time here from Muslims is when Islam is bad mouthed, you don't here shit from them regarding atrocities done in its name.
Just wanted to see if that is clear. I don't think anyone can deny that the Islamic nations are a real problem, it's true that Islam is not disconnected from this problem.
I don't know if the Muslims don't try to decry each other when one of them commits some atrocious act, but I believe part of the problem is that there is no centralised governing organ over the Islamic faith as there are with orthodox / catholic Christians, allowing pretty much everyone to have their own takes on it.
But well, if we're going to complain about it why not try figuring out a solution? Demonizing Islam will only help radicalize its followers... which, no doubt, their religious texts allow as well (the whole "If everyone is trying to persecute ye devout followers it means you are in the end times and will be saved") and all that nonsense.
I don't know if the Muslims don't try to decry each other when one of them commits some atrocious act, but I believe part of the problem is that there is no centralised governing organ over the Islamic faith as there are with orthodox / catholic Christians, allowing pretty much everyone to have their own takes on it.
But well, if we're going to complain about it why not try figuring out a solution? Demonizing Islam will only help radicalize its followers... which, no doubt, their religious texts allow as well (the whole "If everyone is trying to persecute ye devout followers it means you are in the end times and will be saved") and all that nonsense.
inane little opines
You don't think anyone can deny Islamic nations are a problem and Islam is connected to that problem? that is all anyone on this forum does is deny that. Deny it, dismiss it, redirect away from talking about it. Calls anyone who does a racist, a bigot, stupid biased or ignorant.Shocking wrote:
Just wanted to see if that is clear. I don't think anyone can deny that the Islamic nations are a real problem, it's true that Islam is not disconnected from this problem.
I don't know if the Muslims don't try to decry each other when one of them commits some atrocious act, but I believe part of the problem is that there is no centralised governing organ over the Islamic faith as there are with orthodox / catholic Christians, allowing pretty much everyone to have their own takes on it.
But well, if we're going to complain about it why not try figuring out a solution? Demonizing Islam will only help radicalize its followers... which, no doubt, their religious texts allow as well (the whole "If everyone is trying to persecute ye devout followers it means you are in the end times and will be saved") and all that nonsense.
I will complain about it, and I have no solution for it. After 5000 years, who does? I just want it to stay the fuck away from the society I live in.
I didn't demonize Islam by talking about it. Islam did that all on its own by actions it condones, and culture it adopts.
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-11 12:31:43)
Logically - no, you can't. Is it because of them being wholly unreasonable or your stance, though? Using a wide brush and labelling "islamic culture" entirely as being dangerous is simply going to give you lots of wild responses. It's true that radical Islamic cultures exist today and are dangerous today, yet not explicitly stating that you are talking about that particular set of Islamic values is going to get many confused and some annoyed. It's also important to note that the religion itself is responsible for only part of the problem. Not doing this makes it appear as though your stance is extremist on the other end of the spectrum. Annoying, I know, but with sensitive subjects it's best to try and be as clear as possible.lowing wrote:
You don't think anyone can deny Islamic nations are a problem and Islam is connected to that problem? that is all anyone on this forum does is deny that. Deny it, dismiss it, redirect away from talking about it. Calls anyone who does a racist, a bigot, stupid biased or ignorant.
I will complain about it, and I have no solution for it. After 5000 years, who does? I just want it to stay the fuck away from the society I live in.
I didn't demonize Islam by talking about it. Islam did that all on its own by actions it condones, and culture it adopts.
Besides, I don't think this was the best or most accurate example to try and attack the Islamic cultures in question, but anyway that's a bit besides the point now as we're not discussing the incident anymore.
How are you going to make it stay away without worsening the situation though? Come on, you have got to have put some thought into that because, evidently, it's a big concern to you, too (and all of us). But; extremist stances are going to sollicit extremist responses, and I think you're well aware of that.
Last edited by Shocking (2011-03-11 12:47:59)
inane little opines
another shitfuck of a thread from lowing
i'm glad you came back
i'm glad you came back
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
No, the problem is I am not politically correct. Islam is a problem in a world entertaining societies that have reached new levels of morality, tolerance, and equality. Islam is a step backwards, not a step forwards in that progress. Sorry if this forum determines I am a racist, bigot, stupid ignorant, war monger or Nazi because I take Islam and those that practice it, for their word when they say what they want to do to my country or to Israel or infidels etc.... Sorry if I look at what they do to each other and determine it is more than a "few" that is a problem.Shocking wrote:
Logically - no, you can't. Is it because of them being wholly unreasonable or your stance, though? Using a wide brush and labelling "islamic culture" entirely as being dangerous is simply going to give you lots of wild responses. It's true that radical Islamic cultures exist today and are dangerous today, yet not explicitly stating that you are talking about that particular set of Islamic values is going to get many confused and some annoyed. It's also important to note that the religion itself is responsible for only part of the problem. Not doing this makes it appear as though your stance is extremist on the other end of the spectrum. Annoying, I know, but with sensitive subjects it's best to try and be as clear as possible.lowing wrote:
You don't think anyone can deny Islamic nations are a problem and Islam is connected to that problem? that is all anyone on this forum does is deny that. Deny it, dismiss it, redirect away from talking about it. Calls anyone who does a racist, a bigot, stupid biased or ignorant.
I will complain about it, and I have no solution for it. After 5000 years, who does? I just want it to stay the fuck away from the society I live in.
I didn't demonize Islam by talking about it. Islam did that all on its own by actions it condones, and culture it adopts.
Besides, I don't think this was the best or most accurate example to try and attack the Islamic cultures in question, but anyway that's a bit besides the point now as we're not discussing the incident anymore.
How are you going to make it stay away without worsening the situation though? Come on, you have got to have put some thought into that because, evidently, it's a big concern to you, too (and all of us). But; extremist stances are going to sollicit extremist responses, and I think you're well aware of that.
Not sure how recognizing and acknowledging extreme cultures and religions makes me an extremist, that would be for you explain and not me.
You take me far too seriously. Contrary to popular belief or how I am portrayed in this forum, I did not plant mines in my front yard, nor am I stringing up trip wire.
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-11 13:45:56)
Uzi, you know I always appreciate my fans. You are no exception.Uzique wrote:
another shitfuck of a thread from lowing
i'm glad you came back
You already agreed that any religious books in general allow for the justification of any act due to the contradictions all throughout, yes? Then why shouldn't Islam, just like Christianity, be able to adopt our values? The answer is that it can; the vast majority of muslims growing up in our culture differ completely in the practice of their religion from their counterparts in the ME. And knowing this, how can you now again label it entirely as being an extreme religion although in terms of content you can draw thousands of parallels with Christianity?lowing wrote:
No, the problem is I am not politically correct. Islam is a problem in a world entertaining societies that have reached new levels of morality, tolerance, and equality. Islam is a step backwards, not a step forwards in that progress. Sorry if this forum determines I am a racist, bigot, stupid ignorant, war monger or Nazi because I take Islam and those that practice it for their word when they say what they want to do to my country or to Israel.. Sorry if I look at what they do to each other and determine it is more than a "few" that is a problem.
Not sure how recognizing and acknowledging extreme cultures and religions makes me an extremists, that would be for you explain and not me.
You take me far too seriously. Contrary to popular belief or how I am portrayed in this forum, I did not plant mines in my front yard, nor am I stringing up trip wire.
There is so much more to the issue of extremism and you ARE aware of that, as well. It's not just the religion, it's a whole boatload of issues. (and don't mistake this for me being apologetic for the religion, I already told you I'm not. There are glaring issues with Islam itself as well)
I'm not sure of what you actually want in regards to Islam, I've been trying to get a response and twice you tell me; "I want Islam (I suppose, again, you mean the extremist end of its followers) to stay away from me". What does that mean to you? Ban Islam? Nuke the ME? Because that IS the conclusion I'm tempted to take judging by what you're typing. The wide brush you're using, the tone, your actual stance being vague at best, it gives people the impression that you're extreme in regards to Islam.
I can't help how this forum portrays you, honestly that's a problem between you and the other forum members. I'm only being reasonable.
Last edited by Shocking (2011-03-11 14:02:00)
inane little opines
Yeah, I agree, and today here and now, ISLAM is acting on those texts, far more than any other religion. Sure they can adopt any values they want, however the fact is, extremism is becoming an increasing issue with Muslims already in the west. To ignore that is burying your head in the sand. to say it is only a few, again, is burying your head in the sand. How many of the "few" does it really take to set off a catastrophe, especially when it is an active and real concern?Shocking wrote:
You already agreed that any religious books in general allow for the justification of any act due to the contradictions all throughout, yes? Then why shouldn't Islam, just like Christianity, be able to adopt our values? The answer is that it can; the vast majority of muslims growing up in our culture differ completely in the practice of their religion from their counterparts in the ME. And knowing this, how can you now again label it entirely as being an extreme religion although in terms of content you can draw thousands of parallels with Christianity?lowing wrote:
No, the problem is I am not politically correct. Islam is a problem in a world entertaining societies that have reached new levels of morality, tolerance, and equality. Islam is a step backwards, not a step forwards in that progress. Sorry if this forum determines I am a racist, bigot, stupid ignorant, war monger or Nazi because I take Islam and those that practice it for their word when they say what they want to do to my country or to Israel.. Sorry if I look at what they do to each other and determine it is more than a "few" that is a problem.
Not sure how recognizing and acknowledging extreme cultures and religions makes me an extremists, that would be for you explain and not me.
You take me far too seriously. Contrary to popular belief or how I am portrayed in this forum, I did not plant mines in my front yard, nor am I stringing up trip wire.
There is so much more to the issue of extremism and you ARE aware of that, as well. It's not just the religion, it's a whole boatload of issues. (and don't mistake this for me being apologetic for the religion, I already told you I'm not. There are glaring issues with Islam itself as well)
I'm not sure of what you actually want in regards to Islam, I've been trying to get a response and twice you tell me; "I want Islam (I suppose, again, you mean the extremist end of its followers) to stay away from me". What does that mean to you? Ban Islam? Nuke the ME? Because that IS the conclusion I'm tempted to take judging by what you're typing. The wide brush you're using, the tone, your actual stance being vague at best, it gives people the impression that you're extreme in regards to Islam.
I can't help how this forum portrays you, honestly that's a problem between you and the other forum members. I'm only being reasonable.
Ok if you admit that Islam has issues, why not talk about them? Since those issues by and large are the major concern in the west regarding Islam today?
Actually how I am portrayed is not an issue, I couldn't care less. It is just distracting when trying to discuss issues. They want to focus on where I get the info, where I work, what I have done, my hobbies, my politics. They do not want to talk about the topic. They just want to dismiss any point I make because I said it. lol
Last edited by lowing (2011-03-11 18:06:40)
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ … 0-09-36-48
well there ya go. Apparently you can't even talk about radical Islam without the threat of pissing off Muslims who might go radical. Oh and that was a liberal apologist saying it.
Now I ask you, where in the world would anyone get some crazy idea that pissing off Muslims could result in terrorism? I mean how could that be? It isn't like you could draw a picture depicting Muhammad and Islam as violent and send them into violent riots.........Oh wait a sec.
well there ya go. Apparently you can't even talk about radical Islam without the threat of pissing off Muslims who might go radical. Oh and that was a liberal apologist saying it.
Now I ask you, where in the world would anyone get some crazy idea that pissing off Muslims could result in terrorism? I mean how could that be? It isn't like you could draw a picture depicting Muhammad and Islam as violent and send them into violent riots.........Oh wait a sec.