Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6380|eXtreme to the maX

Cybargs wrote:

dont fly in from the ME so you won't get random security screenings
Did you read the OP?

The blog labels tell their story.
anarchy bailout children conservative constitution currency democracy economics economy empire environment federal reserve free speech gold government guns inflation insurance liberal market military morality obamacare politics regulation religion security social security statistics subsidies taxes terrorism torture voting wealth

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-11-14 04:11:27)

Fuck Israel
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6679|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


People would rather have another 9/11. Especially since we know another wont occur.
Why won't it occur? As soon as the West withdraws from the ME the loonies will be gung-ho for another one.
Right, but they've already blown their wad using jets. People are too suspicious now to allow an attack like that to happen again. They'll have to move on to something else. Like I said, the TSA is simply there to make people feel safer while traveling. The real defense against a future attack is our intelligence services and the vigilance of our citizens, not some windowlicker rent a cop.
I really don't trust the "vigilance of our citizens."   Hell, I don't trust their intelligence either.   Most people are fucking retards.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5632|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:


Why won't it occur? As soon as the West withdraws from the ME the loonies will be gung-ho for another one.
Right, but they've already blown their wad using jets. People are too suspicious now to allow an attack like that to happen again. They'll have to move on to something else. Like I said, the TSA is simply there to make people feel safer while traveling. The real defense against a future attack is our intelligence services and the vigilance of our citizens, not some windowlicker rent a cop.
I really don't trust the "vigilance of our citizens."   Hell, I don't trust their intelligence either.   Most people are fucking retards.
Self preservation is a wonderful motivator. See: underwear bomber.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Karbin
Member
+42|6569
SAN MATEO COUNTY, Calif. (KGO) -- The San Mateo district attorney's office has a warning for all TSA personnel at SFO -- anyone inappropriately touching a passenger during a security pat down will be prosecuted.
Incoming San Mateo DA Steve Wagstaffe says any complaints of inappropriate touching during an airport security pat down will land on his desk.
"The case would be reviewed and if we could prove the elements of it, that it was inappropriately done with a sexual or lewd intent, that person would be prosecuted," he said.
The charge -- sexual battery.
"If it is skin to skin, if someone were to take their hand and put it underneath somebody's blouse and touch someone inappropriately and go skin to skin, that's a felony, and if it's done simply over the clothing, according to California law, that's a misdemeanor," Wagstaffe said.
More pat down searches are expected because some passengers are refusing to go through the image scanning device. Homeland Security announced more scanners are on the way as part of the enhanced security measures at all airports.
Homeland Security Sec. Janet Napolitano has said a passenger's privacy is protected.
"We built privacy concerns into the procedures when they were deployed," she said.
Not all travelers are buying Napolitano's claim.
"It's ridiculous and it's not safer, they are just doing it to have us more fearful and there is no reason for it," passenger Cathlyn Daley
But many passengers at SFO do not mind the enhanced security.
"I would much rather go through a little uncomfortableness and know that I will be safe or a least know that everything was done to protect me," passenger Suzanne Beaty said.
A few however, do.
"A stranger groping you basically," passenger David Barth said.
Passengers should know once they go through security, a TSA officer can ask them to submit to a pat down.
"At that point somewhere in that process you get to a point where you can't withdraw and you will be searched whether you like it or not," ABC7 legal analyst Dean Johnson said.
Wagstaffe has yet to receive a complaint.
SFO security screeners work for a company contracted by the TSA but undergo the same training and comply with the same regulations as TSA employees.
As for the assurance that the images from body scanners are never saved, tech blog Gizmodo obtained 100 saved photos after filing a request through the Freedom of Information Act, just a few of the 35,000 photos that were stored on a machine at the federal courthouse in Miami.
Gizmodo eliminated identifying features before posting them, but the pictures demonstrate the security issues still being worked out with the machines.

(Copyright2010 KGO-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)


We tell our children every day that a stranger cannot touch them. And yet it's ok for a government employee to do so?

The Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR) announced yesterday that full body pat-downs were not to be done on Muslim women.

I will leave you with this thought: It is acceptable and encouraged that a TSA government official can do something to an American citizen that US military personnel cannot do to a member of the Taliban.

Last edited by Karbin (2010-11-17 22:03:16)

CC-Marley
Member
+407|7103
http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local-beat/T … 97568.html
Thought I'd add this. Not very assuring.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6427|what

Well, if she had been wearing a headscarf...
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6855|the dank(super) side of Oregon
it's all a show.
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,054|6897|Little Bentcock
who the fuck cares if you walk through an imaging machine? The people monitoring them would see those little bumps for hours upon hours, potentially 5 days a week. I'm sure after their first hour ever of doing it they stop even noticing those little bumps.
-CARNIFEX-[LOC]
Da Blooze
+111|6928

Adams_BJ wrote:

who the fuck cares if you walk through an imaging machine? The people monitoring them would see those little bumps for hours upon hours, potentially 5 days a week. I'm sure after their first hour ever of doing it they stop even noticing those little bumps.
It's more upsetting that untold amounts of money are spent on the machines, which literally do nothing else but present an appearance of rigorous security protocol to travelers.  Not to mention the ineffective personnel manning them.  Only a truly amateurish "terrorist" would get caught by the "security" at most airports...the real ones would surely have means to circumvent them.



I'm all for feeling safe while traveling.  Having security that don't look like they also work a second job managing a Burger King is a start.  Ex-cops and ex-military, with proper training and decent pay, would probably do a bang-up job of providing airport security with much less overall intrusiveness.

Last edited by -CARNIFEX-[LOC] (2011-02-21 20:55:48)

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/12516/Bitch%20Hunter%20Sig.jpg
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|7013|Toronto | Canada

I just went through Newark and Billy Bishop in Toronto.  Both had the machines there but neither were actually used for any of the few hundred people that passed through security.  I dont know why they were even there.  Billy Bishop had 2 of them and Newark had at least 5, and that was at their smallest terminal.
Miggle
FUCK UBISOFT
+1,411|7016|FUCK UBISOFT

The TSA should only hire muscular bald guys with eyepatches and big scars.
https://i.imgur.com/86fodNE.png
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|7013|Toronto | Canada

newark was 100% overweight, moody black women.  then again, it seemed like everything in new york was run by overweight, moody black women
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6771

LoL
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6427|what

Winston_Churchill wrote:

newark was 100% overweight, moody black women.  then again, it seemed like everything in new york was run by overweight, moody black women
Oh no you did-ent!

*snaps fingers in the air twice infront of face*
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,054|6897|Little Bentcock

AussieReaper wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

newark was 100% overweight, moody black women.  then again, it seemed like everything in new york was run by overweight, moody black women
Oh no you did-ent!

*snaps fingers in the air twice infront of face*
dont forget the head wobble
CC-Marley
Member
+407|7103
And the raised eyebrows...
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,054|6897|Little Bentcock
and the fat ass
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6423|'straya
and the fried chicken

Last edited by Little BaBy JESUS (2011-02-21 22:03:01)

Commie Killer
Member
+192|6661
and the watermellon
and the grape juice
and the bible
and the choir
and the kkk
wait

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard