I plat.'d id when it was OP.. haven't touched it sinceUnkleRukus wrote:
Only LMG worth using is the M60.
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
I plat.'d id when it was OP.. haven't touched it sinceUnkleRukus wrote:
Only LMG worth using is the M60.
1500 kills before I stopped on PC.FloppY_ wrote:
I plat.'d id when it was OP.. haven't touched it sinceUnkleRukus wrote:
Only LMG worth using is the M60.
It was, but it now does the same damage as the PKM, yet the PKM has a faster fire rate.UnkleRukus wrote:
Only LMG worth using is the M60.
The M60's stock sights are close to blinds tbhFatherTed wrote:
also its stock sights are...bad. pkm not so bad
You won't have the same awe for the M60 as someone who played with it during the release stage. It was pretty much the second greatest rape machine, the first being the Carl Gustav.Moonraker_x29 wrote:
I did mean the MG3. Also, new hate. The M249. Somehow I didn't realise I had so many kills with it, so just platinumed that yesterday, It was dreadful. Will stay clear unless I pick it up to revive someone sometime.
Now working on M60, whoever likes it, good. Difference is great. I loathe it. It's like a pea shooter (especially in Vietnam).
Also, Heavy Metal was a huge mistake for this game. In no way (and no one) can justify that on a 16v16 server let alone the idiots who have 20 man servers and that crops up. Seriously, are people that thick?
In BF3, that map would probably work. I say probably as I only know it's gonna have planes and 32v32. BF3 could suck of course!
no...UnkleRukus wrote:
You won't have the same awe for the M60 as someone who played with it during the release stage. It was pretty much the second greatest rape machine, the first being the Carl Gustav.Moonraker_x29 wrote:
I did mean the MG3. Also, new hate. The M249. Somehow I didn't realise I had so many kills with it, so just platinumed that yesterday, It was dreadful. Will stay clear unless I pick it up to revive someone sometime.
Now working on M60, whoever likes it, good. Difference is great. I loathe it. It's like a pea shooter (especially in Vietnam).
Also, Heavy Metal was a huge mistake for this game. In no way (and no one) can justify that on a 16v16 server let alone the idiots who have 20 man servers and that crops up. Seriously, are people that thick?
In BF3, that map would probably work. I say probably as I only know it's gonna have planes and 32v32. BF3 could suck of course!
Apples to Oranges. Any 4 to 1 match is obvious. 4 Assaults or 4 CG squads would rape any 4 Medic squad. And the 4 medic squad would have no chance against a covered gun emplacement or armor.Trotskygrad wrote:
no...UnkleRukus wrote:
You won't have the same awe for the M60 as someone who played with it during the release stage. It was pretty much the second greatest rape machine, the first being the Carl Gustav.Moonraker_x29 wrote:
I did mean the MG3. Also, new hate. The M249. Somehow I didn't realise I had so many kills with it, so just platinumed that yesterday, It was dreadful. Will stay clear unless I pick it up to revive someone sometime.
Now working on M60, whoever likes it, good. Difference is great. I loathe it. It's like a pea shooter (especially in Vietnam).
Also, Heavy Metal was a huge mistake for this game. In no way (and no one) can justify that on a 16v16 server let alone the idiots who have 20 man servers and that crops up. Seriously, are people that thick?
In BF3, that map would probably work. I say probably as I only know it's gonna have planes and 32v32. BF3 could suck of course!
a 4 man M60 medic squad could steamroll any other opposition back then
I went up against them with a CG, killed 2, got raped. Revived their squadmates, kept on rolling
With the amount of people using CGs, armor was never a real problem. Unless you knew how to rape with it.Ilocano wrote:
Apples to Oranges. Any 4 to 1 match is obvious. 4 Assaults or 4 CG squads would rape any 4 Medic squad. And the 4 medic squad would have no chance against a covered gun emplacement or armor.Trotskygrad wrote:
no...UnkleRukus wrote:
You won't have the same awe for the M60 as someone who played with it during the release stage. It was pretty much the second greatest rape machine, the first being the Carl Gustav.
a 4 man M60 medic squad could steamroll any other opposition back then
I went up against them with a CG, killed 2, got raped. Revived their squadmates, kept on rolling
I understand that. My comment was against those all medic squads.UnkleRukus wrote:
With the amount of people using CGs, armor was never a real problem. Unless you knew how to rape with it.Ilocano wrote:
Apples to Oranges. Any 4 to 1 match is obvious. 4 Assaults or 4 CG squads would rape any 4 Medic squad. And the 4 medic squad would have no chance against a covered gun emplacement or armor.Trotskygrad wrote:
no...
a 4 man M60 medic squad could steamroll any other opposition back then
I went up against them with a CG, killed 2, got raped. Revived their squadmates, kept on rolling
why is that funny/sad? different people play the game differently. BC2 doesn't have nearly the nade spam as BF2.Rod Foxx wrote:
Something I find incredibly funny/sad is seeing rank 30 players with platinum grenade, when after 431 hours and 7.6 million points I'm only on 5 gold stars
Hell yeah. Not so much smoking the MCOM's, but rather, smoking the campers.Mekstizzle wrote:
40mm smoke spammers are the best. Talk what you want about Vehicles, destruction, Carl Gustav and other explosives. Nothing changes a game more than a shitload of smoke, EVERYWHERE.
Because it was designed to be anti-infantry, bunker buster first. Not really meant for heavy armor. So, really, in BC2, it's being used exactly for its purpose.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
^^ i agree with that statement
It seems like the Gustav was made specifically for killing infantry. I stopped using it as engy because the other options have more damage