I'll play it anyway cos no matter how bad it may or may not be, it'll fucking own whatever else comes.
THIS WILL BE NO ET:QW.
THIS WILL BE NO ET:QW.
Pages: 1 … 47 48 49 50 51 … 683
This is the sad truth.Moonraker_x29 wrote:
I'll play it anyway cos no matter how bad it may or may not be, it'll fucking own whatever else comes.
Am I a nerd for wanting Diablo 3 even more?Camm wrote:
i'm honestly like a little kid waiting for christmas. I want it so bad. And I want it to be FUCKING AMAZING.
No you're a nerd for watching children's cartoons.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Am I a nerd for wanting Diablo 3 even more?Camm wrote:
i'm honestly like a little kid waiting for christmas. I want it so bad. And I want it to be FUCKING AMAZING.
Oh yeah, I'll just go watch some Michael Bay.Macbeth wrote:
No you're a nerd for watching children's cartoons.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Am I a nerd for wanting Diablo 3 even more?Camm wrote:
i'm honestly like a little kid waiting for christmas. I want it so bad. And I want it to be FUCKING AMAZING.
Haha..I remember ET:QW, why was it hyped so much as the BF2 killer. So many nerds coming in, making statements about how they're "finishing their BF2 careers and moving onto the much better ET:QW" game etc... and it flopped, it flopped like shit.Moonraker_x29 wrote:
I'll play it anyway cos no matter how bad it may or may not be, it'll fucking own whatever else comes.
THIS WILL BE NO ET:QW.
-Aiming for CY Q4 2011 release
-Concept for BF3 has been in the works for years, waiting on proper tech to seamlessly come together
-Frosbite 2.0 is the culmination of this tech, entirely re-written
-Lighting sounds neat, one "probe" contains more lighting information than an entire BFBC2 level.
-Level destruction is going to be "believable" but basically everything is destructible.
-Character animations powered by ANT, what EA Sports uses.
-AI characters and multiplayer characters have different animation sets
-No more "gliding" animations that look off, animation realism is a focus
-Captured their own war audios (bullets, tanks, helicopters, etc) at different distances to ensure realism
-Better audio cues for certain actions, more easily able to listen for threats
-Plan on better, more immediate post release content
-More unlocks than BFBC2
-Dice trying to find a good balance between customization of your character and not having "pink rabbit hat(s)"
-4 classes
-Will talk about squads "later"
-Looking into a theater mode but can't talk about it
-Will have co-op
-There will be a kill-cam but it can be turned off
-BF3's team is almost twice as big as the team for BFBC2
-They want the pacing of the single player mode to be balanced, with highs and lows. Makes the comparison to a song vs a guitar solo.
-Part of the single player mode takes place in Sulaymaniyah - Iraqi Kurdistan.
-"****" will be used often, so M rated for sure
-There will be an earthquake in a level. The destruction sounds very impressive. 7 story building collapses, looks very well done
-Significant narrative that goes with the SP mode
-More than one setting, you're not in the middle east for the whole game
-PC version is lead version
-Why 64 players for PC only? No complains from the console crowd.
-No mod tools at release. Maybe none down the line either. Frosbite 2.0 is complex and mods tools would have to be dumbed down, so does Dice really want to put their time to that or would it be better spent elsewhere?
-Original story, not based on Bad Company at all.
EJECTION PORTSDoctor Strangelove wrote:
Does that M4 have 31 rounds?
-Sh1fty- will cream himself.
What a slap in the face to all the modders out there. Just an excuseLucien wrote:
as for no mod tools, I call bullshit on them having to be 'dumbed down', BF2's mod tools aren't dumbed down and let you do just about everything you want.
I stand by this.Jaekus wrote:
lol @ thisMiggle wrote:
I have no doubt that EA/DICE will release more battlefield games, and most will probably be released on all platforms. I simply doubt that they will ever release another true PC battlefield game. I'm also almost completely sure that guy was talking about BC2.M.O.A.B wrote:
Or perhaps its because BF3 is going to be released on all platforms? As was rumoured? You know, like Crysis 2 is going to be?
And this too?Miggle wrote:
I stand by this.Jaekus wrote:
lol @ thisMiggle wrote:
I have no doubt that EA/DICE will release more battlefield games, and most will probably be released on all platforms. I simply doubt that they will ever release another true PC battlefield game. I'm also almost completely sure that guy was talking about BC2.M.O.A.B wrote:
Or perhaps its because BF3 is going to be released on all platforms? As was rumoured? You know, like Crysis 2 is going to be?
Miggle wrote:
He's not saying "what the PC version of BF3 is going to be"Jaekus wrote:
I doubt he's talking about the PC version for BFBC2. The beta was already out when that interview was made (Feb 22, 2010). Hell, it was only 2 weeks before it was released so he must have been talking about BF3.Miggle wrote:
"What the PC version is going to be" He's talking about the PC version of BFBC2. He inaccurately refers to it as BF3, perhaps BF3 was an early working title for BFBC2?Jaekus wrote:
BF3 has been announced as an independant game, seperate from BC2 in an interview about BC2. So the claim that BC2 is BF3 is simply incorrect.
he's saying "what the PC version is going to be, battlefield 3,"
He's referring to the PC version of something as battlefield 3, which I can't imagine being anything but BFBC2
Isn't that what I just said?Jaekus wrote:
And this too?Miggle wrote:
I stand by this.Jaekus wrote:
lol @ thisMiggle wrote:
I have no doubt that EA/DICE will release more battlefield games, and most will probably be released on all platforms. I simply doubt that they will ever release another true PC battlefield game. I'm also almost completely sure that guy was talking about BC2.M.O.A.B wrote:
Or perhaps its because BF3 is going to be released on all platforms? As was rumoured? You know, like Crysis 2 is going to be?Miggle wrote:
He's not saying "what the PC version of BF3 is going to be"Jaekus wrote:
I doubt he's talking about the PC version for BFBC2. The beta was already out when that interview was made (Feb 22, 2010). Hell, it was only 2 weeks before it was released so he must have been talking about BF3.
he's saying "what the PC version is going to be, battlefield 3,"
He's referring to the PC version of something as battlefield 3, which I can't imagine being anything but BFBC2
Pages: 1 … 47 48 49 50 51 … 683