Official Drunk Thread

2011-02-09 11:04:55

#2651

Camm: Feeding the Cats.; +761|5538|Dundee, Scotland.

nukchebi0 wrote:
Camm wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
darn camm maybe instead of just letting out little pathetic internet rage you should explain why you dont like me i think it'd make for a more constructive dialogue
Because you talk down to everyone on this forum because you think you qualify as a superior in some self-centred way, you come in here bragging about being drunk, and then when called a tool for the way you're acting, you have a go at everyone.
this is honestly a very inaccurate assessment of my persona here, and one laden heavily in double standards

point me out some double standards.

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.

2011-02-09 11:08:40

#2652

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6271|College Park, MD

Nuk, I think the problem people have with you is you constantly shift between your normal self and your trying-to-sound-stupid persona.

It may not have been popular, but I liked your "I'm so smart and educated" persona a lot more than your "hay guyzzz I'm a total frat br0 LoL" thing that you know is only meant to troll. Effective, yes, but you've gotta rotate things and keep 'em fresh or else they lose the novelty and just become annoying.

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg

2011-02-09 11:13:54

#2653

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|7107|Long Island, New York

Nuk's been doing the whole "I'm better than you" thing for a long time. I remember years back when I was in 10th grade and he was in 11th, he looked down upon me for being a year younger than him. The best part about it all is that normally that kind of overconfidence would lead to someone getting a lot of girls (at least in the American colleges), but really he's totally inept with females by his own word and a lonely little twat who feels the needs to come to an internet forum where everyone hates him to post about how drunk he is. Makes me happy there's at least some sort of karma in the world.

2011-02-09 11:22:56

#2654

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|7040

nukchebi0 wrote:
Camm wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
darn camm maybe instead of just letting out little pathetic internet rage you should explain why you dont like me i think it'd make for a more constructive dialogue
Because you talk down to everyone on this forum because you think you qualify as a superior in some self-centred way, you come in here bragging about being drunk, and then when called a tool for the way you're acting, you have a go at everyone.
this is honestly a very inaccurate assessment of my persona here, and one laden heavily in double standards

"one laden heavily in double standards"

such a keen grasp of the english language!

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-02-09 12:41:47

#2655

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6893|New Haven, CT

Uzique wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
Camm wrote:

Because you talk down to everyone on this forum because you think you qualify as a superior in some self-centred way, you come in here bragging about being drunk, and then when called a tool for the way you're acting, you have a go at everyone.
this is honestly a very inaccurate assessment of my persona here, and one laden heavily in double standards
"one laden heavily in double standards"

such a keen grasp of the english language!

as i noted above...

2011-02-09 12:53:08

#2656

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|7224

I, for one, will commend nukchebi0 on his trolling, based on the various responses seen throughout this thread.
Then again, I haven't read this thread in ages...

Last edited by mtb0minime (2011-02-09 12:54:57)

2011-02-09 13:12:07

#2657

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|7040

nukchebi0 wrote:
Uzique wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:

this is honestly a very inaccurate assessment of my persona here, and one laden heavily in double standards
"one laden heavily in double standards"

such a keen grasp of the english language!
as i noted above...

the thing is you try to be 'verbose' and grandiloquent but you misuse words and actually obfuscate the point... which is very poor writing.

it's like the kid trying hard to use big words and complex phrasing, but failing twice as hard because all he achieves is demonstrating his lack of ability.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-02-09 14:20:42

#2658

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6271|College Park, MD

Uzique wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
Uzique wrote:

"one laden heavily in double standards"

such a keen grasp of the english language!
as i noted above...
the thing is you try to be 'verbose' and grandiloquent but you misuse words and actually obfuscate the point... which is very poor writing.

it's like the kid trying hard to use big words and complex phrasing, but failing twice as hard because all he achieves is demonstrating his lack of ability.

I honestly think he's intentionally doing it, but that's like trolling people by dressing up in an SS uniform. Yeah it'll raise the ire of people but you'll be dressed like a Nazi.

2011-02-09 17:29:28

#2659

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6893|New Haven, CT

Uzique wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
Uzique wrote:

"one laden heavily in double standards"

such a keen grasp of the english language!
as i noted above...
the thing is you try to be 'verbose' and grandiloquent but you misuse words and actually obfuscate the point... which is very poor writing.

it's like the kid trying hard to use big words and complex phrasing, but failing twice as hard because all he achieves is demonstrating his lack of ability.

perhaps you could illustrate the "proper" way to write that sentence?

2011-02-09 17:52:51

#2660

coke: Aye up duck!; +440|7279|England. Stoke

heavily laden, or laden heavily WITH

Last edited by coke (2011-02-09 17:54:05)

2011-02-09 17:58:11

#2661

Camm: Feeding the Cats.; +761|5538|Dundee, Scotland.

coke wrote:
heavily laden, or laden heavily WITH

This, you fucking spaz

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.

2011-02-09 18:00:05

#2662

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,997|7201|949

nukchebi0 wrote:
Uzique wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:

as i noted above...
the thing is you try to be 'verbose' and grandiloquent but you misuse words and actually obfuscate the point... which is very poor writing.

it's like the kid trying hard to use big words and complex phrasing, but failing twice as hard because all he achieves is demonstrating his lack of ability.
perhaps you could illustrate the "proper" way to write that sentence?

you'se got double standads!

2011-02-09 18:07:03