BF2S Forums Looking for Rush, Haninty counter Radio from the Left - Any Ideas ?

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Calling it "war" doesn't justify anything. It's closer ethnic cleansing when you systematically destroy a country and decrease it's borders.

Then here is free advice stop attacking those that will kick your ass. It is a war started by the Arabs and Islamic nations stop blaming Israel for having the nerve to fight back and win

You are actually pissed that the ethnic cleansing of Israel isn't working. What makes your POV any better?

You're again creating a straw man argument. I do not support ethnic cleansing of Israel.

Seriously, your counter arguments need some improvement.

Last edited by lowing (2011-02-07 17:13:37)

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-02-07 17:14:46)

presidentsheep wrote:

Just looked through the site lowing posted and if you follow the guys links, a lot of them aren't about what he says they are, or are dead links.
He's used information very selectively from sources, cherry picking to support his views instead of giving a balanced view.
Plus his headline makes it fairly obvious the sites going to be biased.

tl;dr:
bad source.

edit: lowing, if you're going to try to make a point, the way it's usually acceptable to make it is to present both sides of the argument then draw your conclusions from the balanced information you've presented, it's then up to your reader to either agree with your opinion or not based on how well they feel you've interpreted all the evidence, for both sides of the argument.
It's not right to just use evidence to back up your views and not give a counter to it.

Last edited by lowing (2011-02-07 17:20:02)

lowing wrote:

Now, argue against the information present, and stop arguing against the presence of the information.

lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

And the goal of WW2 was the destruction of Nazi Germany, was there anything wrong with that goal?
Are you saying the Nazis should have fought harder?

nothing worng with that goal if you were against the Naiz's that started the war in the first place...apropos comparison really..
lol yeah dilbert, if the nazi's were gunna win they needed to fight harder with a stronger strategy...Are you trying to make a point or something?

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

And the goal of WW2 was the destruction of Nazi Germany, was there anything wrong with that goal?
Are you saying the Nazis should have fought harder?

nothing worng with that goal if you were against the Naiz's that started the war in the first place...apropos comparison really..
lol yeah dilbert, if the nazi's were gunna win they needed to fight harder with a stronger strategy...Are you trying to make a point or something?

The point is we were against aggression, not the Nazis in particular.

Last edited by lowing (2011-02-07 17:29:55)

Jaekus wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

I just came in here to wonder how the fuck we'd been talking about radio for 23 pages, but now I see in typical fashion that stopped after the first 5 posts.

Don't look at me. I only wanted to make sure I was getting both points of view. I least I F*kin tried.

Yeah, unfortunately the thread really needs to be closed now.

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Then here is free advice stop attacking those that will kick your ass. It is a war started by the Arabs and Islamic nations stop blaming Israel for having the nerve to fight back and win

You are actually pissed that the ethnic cleansing of Israel isn't working. What makes your POV any better?

You're again creating a straw man argument. I do not support ethnic cleansing of Israel.

Seriously, your counter arguments need some improvement.

no my counter argument is simple, attack the information present, do not attack the presentation of the information.

you are actually arguing that it is wrong for Israel to hit back HARDER than it gets hit. It is a ridiculous stance.Well the goal is the destruction of Israel, you do realize that right?


Now, argue that Israel has not been attacked even after pulling out

lowing wrote:

Israel did not start this, but I think they are quite capable of finishing it

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Israel did not start this, but I think they are quite capable of finishing it

Yeah, you want Palestine desroyed.

You're a xenophobic, anti-Islamic nutcase who can't see past the right-wing blogs you've been spoon fed with.

There is an ongoing humanitarian crisis in Palestine but you'd rather see the country torn apart.

Last edited by lowing (2011-02-07 17:50:49)

Last edited by lowing (2011-02-07 17:59:32)