If a Muslim said this, there'd be a huge uproar.
Christian says it.. "Oh, it's just the Bible Belt being the bible belt".
Christian says it.. "Oh, it's just the Bible Belt being the bible belt".
Well, not necessarily. It's a difference in resources. Christian Zionists have influence amidst the most powerful military in the world, whereas Islamists tend to have considerably fewer governmental connections. Even the ones that do involve far less powerful governments.UnkleRukus wrote:
Anyone ever stop to think that Islamic Terrorists are just better at building bombs than Christian Terrorists?
Most suicide bombers are poor people led to believe they are doing it for a higher cause. I guarantee you there are almost 0 instances of rich people blowing themselves up in the name of god. Plus, Christians are fucking lazy when compared to Islamics.Turquoise wrote:
Well, not necessarily. It's a difference in resources. Christian Zionists have influence amidst the most powerful military in the world, whereas Islamists tend to have considerably fewer governmental connections. Even the ones that do involve far less powerful governments.UnkleRukus wrote:
Anyone ever stop to think that Islamic Terrorists are just better at building bombs than Christian Terrorists?
There's no need to strap a bomb to yourself if you can influence where a military decides to attack.
Last edited by UnkleRukus (2011-01-19 12:38:58)
heh we could include Christian related terrorism outside of the US if you reaaalllly want to get into thatDBBrinson1 wrote:
hmmm. Thought there were was life outside the US.Bertster7 wrote:
You said bombings, which was why I made that edit. 1 dead Muslim suicide bomber as a result of Islamic bombings in the US.lowing wrote:
Oh I see, so the 3000 dead from Islamic terrorism doesn't count because it wasn't a bombing? Got it, well then you win. Christians are far more deadly and fanatical in this world than Muslims.
In any event, taking one isolated incident does nothing to prove any sort of trend, which is what is important here. The trend is that Christian terrorism is more prolific in the US than Islamic terrorism. One incident, no matter how serious or tragic, cannot prove a trend.
ReidUnkleRukus wrote:
Anyone ever stop to think that Islamic Terrorists are just better at building bombs than Christian Terrorists?
Knock your self out. The IRA is f'n hard core.FatherTed wrote:
heh we could include Christian related terrorism outside of the US if you reaaalllly want to get into thatDBBrinson1 wrote:
hmmm. Thought there were was life outside the US.Bertster7 wrote:
You said bombings, which was why I made that edit. 1 dead Muslim suicide bomber as a result of Islamic bombings in the US.
In any event, taking one isolated incident does nothing to prove any sort of trend, which is what is important here. The trend is that Christian terrorism is more prolific in the US than Islamic terrorism. One incident, no matter how serious or tragic, cannot prove a trend.
One guy, awesome example bro. Which Reid by the way, your specifics are overwhelming.DBBrinson1 wrote:
ReidUnkleRukus wrote:
Anyone ever stop to think that Islamic Terrorists are just better at building bombs than Christian Terrorists?
Last edited by UnkleRukus (2011-01-19 12:41:27)
An interesting thought. I mean, look at the "militias" in America. Filled with inbred, uneducated people.UnkleRukus wrote:
Anyone ever stop to think that Islamic Terrorists are just better at building bombs than Christian Terrorists?
Agreed. As far as how the wealthy usually factor into things, wealthy Islamists (like Osama bin Laden) sometimes fund terror groups, whereas wealthy Zionists fund political candidates that support aggressive actions by Israel and/or candidates that are more likely to intervene in Middle Eastern conflicts.UnkleRukus wrote:
Most suicide bombers are poor people led to believe they are doing it for a higher cause. I guarantee you there are almost 0 instances of rich people blowing themselves up in the name of god.Turquoise wrote:
Well, not necessarily. It's a difference in resources. Christian Zionists have influence amidst the most powerful military in the world, whereas Islamists tend to have considerably fewer governmental connections. Even the ones that do involve far less powerful governments.UnkleRukus wrote:
Anyone ever stop to think that Islamic Terrorists are just better at building bombs than Christian Terrorists?
There's no need to strap a bomb to yourself if you can influence where a military decides to attack.
Same shit, different battlefield.Turquoise wrote:
Agreed. As far as how the wealthy usually factor into things, wealthy Islamists (like Osama bin Laden) sometimes fund terror groups, whereas wealthy Zionists fund political candidates that support aggressive actions by Israel and/or candidates that are more likely to intervene in Middle Eastern conflicts.UnkleRukus wrote:
Most suicide bombers are poor people led to believe they are doing it for a higher cause. I guarantee you there are almost 0 instances of rich people blowing themselves up in the name of god.Turquoise wrote:
Well, not necessarily. It's a difference in resources. Christian Zionists have influence amidst the most powerful military in the world, whereas Islamists tend to have considerably fewer governmental connections. Even the ones that do involve far less powerful governments.
There's no need to strap a bomb to yourself if you can influence where a military decides to attack.
So yeah, the poor and ignorant ones tend to be the cannon fodder.
Um... that's an interesting way to define lazy... I see it more as extremists among Christians usually being more willing to enlist than to blow themselves up.UnkleRukus wrote:
Plus, Christians are fucking lazy when compared to Islamics.
Underwear bomber.UnkleRukus wrote:
One guy, awesome example bro. Which Reid by the way, your specifics are overwhelming.DBBrinson1 wrote:
ReidUnkleRukus wrote:
Anyone ever stop to think that Islamic Terrorists are just better at building bombs than Christian Terrorists?
Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2011-01-19 12:46:59)
Every fucking time you post it's just a jumbled mess of words. For fucks suck man, put some thought into your sentences so they aren't confusing piles of shit.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Does Bently hang out and party with Terrorists ? They elected him let them deal with it, my plate is full. Why selective repulsion ?
Well, several of the terror plots involving doctors and such demonstrate that a knowledge of say... medicine... does not denote a knowledge of bombmaking or wielding weapons effectively.Poseidon wrote:
An interesting thought. I mean, look at the "militias" in America. Filled with inbred, uneducated people.UnkleRukus wrote:
Anyone ever stop to think that Islamic Terrorists are just better at building bombs than Christian Terrorists?
Now look at some of the plots in Britain. Doctors. Scientists. Wealthy, knowledgable people.
keep throwing down that card, and with a Racist term to boot. No Class imo13/f/taiwan wrote:
i win. you lose. racism fails every time crackers.
Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2011-01-19 14:05:57)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umar_Farouk_AbdulmutallabDBBrinson1 wrote:
Underwear bomber.UnkleRukus wrote:
One guy, awesome example bro. Which Reid by the way, your specifics are overwhelming.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Reid
Richard the Shoefucker
Last edited by UnkleRukus (2011-01-19 12:49:52)
oh lordy if it was only the IRA... here's a quick list from wikipedia of irish based catholic/protestant terrorist groups;DBBrinson1 wrote:
Knock your self out. The IRA is f'n hard core.FatherTed wrote:
heh we could include Christian related terrorism outside of the US if you reaaalllly want to get into thatDBBrinson1 wrote:
hmmm. Thought there were was life outside the US.
Last edited by FatherTed (2011-01-19 12:52:37)
By comparison, Your thoughts are so much more concise and clear. Get a new shtick please.UnkleRukus wrote:
Every fucking time you post it's just a jumbled mess of words. For fucks suck man, put some thought into your sentences so they aren't confusing piles of shit.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
1. Does Bently hang out and party with Terrorists ?
2. They elected him, let them deal with it, My plate is full.
3. Why selective repulsion ?
Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2011-01-19 12:54:53)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue meHunter/Jumper wrote:
By comparison, Your thoughts are so much more concise and clear. Get a new shtick please.UnkleRukus wrote:
Every fucking time you post it's just a jumbled mess of words. For fucks suck man, put some thought into your sentences so they aren't confusing piles of shit.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
1. Does Bently hang out and party with Terrorists ?
2. They elected him, let them deal with it, My plate is full.
3. Why selective repulsion ?
It seems like he is reaching out and means well " I want to be your brother," better check him for an explosive belt anyway.burnzz wrote:
wow, we've come a long way from
"Anybody here today who has not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior, I'm telling you, you're not my brother and you're not my sister, and I want to be your brother,"
why do you assume that Tourette's has more of a stigma than your affliction?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
It seems like he is reaching out and means well " I want to be your brother," better check him for an explosive belt anyway.
Ps. Show up cursing if you are a dolt !
I don't jump in with nothing to add but insult. Correct me if I am wrong but your affliction makes it impossible that anything can be passed on genetically so we will leave you out of it. Agreed.burnzz wrote:
why do you assume that Tourette's has more of a stigma than your affliction?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
It seems like he is reaching out and means well " I want to be your brother," better check him for an explosive belt anyway.
Ps. Show up cursing if you are a dolt !