320GB bitch, I win!Jaekus wrote:
500GB reprezent.menzo wrote:
i only has 5TB
Only using 36GB of that mofo too! suck on that.
Last edited by Nic (2011-01-18 17:43:19)
320GB bitch, I win!Jaekus wrote:
500GB reprezent.menzo wrote:
i only has 5TB
Last edited by Nic (2011-01-18 17:43:19)
Lies!!!!burnzz wrote:
i've got 32 g in my laptop . . .
a 32gb iphone has more power than your laptop.burnzz wrote:
i've got 32 g in my laptop . . .
Nic wrote:
320GB bitch, I win!Jaekus wrote:
500GB reprezent.menzo wrote:
i only has 5TB
Only using 36GB of that mofo too! suck on that.
sadly, no. hardly ever use it. i've got 10 TB in my lan, altogether . . .Nic wrote:
Lies!!!!burnzz wrote:
i've got 32 g in my laptop . . .
Its got me thinking I could probably drop a 60GB ssd in there and get by on it. I may wait till 100-120GB drop in price though.Jaekus wrote:
Nic wrote:
320GB bitch, I win!Jaekus wrote:
500GB reprezent.
Only using 36GB of that mofo too! suck on that.
I've only got about 46GB free. Mind you I could probably delete a few things as I despise clutter on my computer, but cbf at the moment.
itt Idiotsburnzz wrote:
sshh! let floppy learn the hard way! it's the only way . . . aw fuck it, who'm i kidding.
Will you just shut the fuck up?mikkel wrote:
Then you're less than clever. You are aware of what the 'R' stands for, right? It doesn't stand for "backup," because RAID isn't backup.FloppY_ wrote:
RAID1 = Mirrormikkel wrote:
RAID is redundancy. It isn't backup.
If one drive dies, I only have to replace it, and no data will be lost since the other drive has the same data...
I'd call that the same as doing a on-pc backup on a seperate disc...
I have used common sense for ~5 years now, and I have NEVER had a virus... Even if I did, what do I care when the RAIDed drives are for non-system / non-boot / non-auto-executing stuff... yeah that will be so hard to extract stuff from if infected by a non-executed trojan right? HURRRRRR!AussieReaper wrote:
And if you get a virus you infect two hard drives.
lol
Kind of negates the plan for a backup if that happens...
Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-01-18 17:54:37)
Nice!Nic wrote:
Its got me thinking I could probably drop a 60GB ssd in there and get by on it. I may wait till 100-120GB drop in price though.Jaekus wrote:
Nic wrote:
320GB bitch, I win!
Only using 36GB of that mofo too! suck on that.
I've only got about 46GB free. Mind you I could probably delete a few things as I despise clutter on my computer, but cbf at the moment.
...AussieReaper wrote:
Wait, so you're not even backing up your OS at all, and want to have a RAID system so that your non-system / non-boot / non-auto-executing stuff is protected, but only if one of the drives fails?
Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-01-18 18:02:02)
Say that to my old HDDAussieReaper wrote:
But the chances are that a hhd will just suddenly fail is extremely low.
And you can usually tell when it's time to replace a hdd and still backup everything before it does die.
I'm not, the one that crashed and burned was a WD Raptor... and I didn't even move the PC between day x and x+1AussieReaper wrote:
What did you do, throw your motherboard down a flight of stairs? lol
And why buy the same brand of hdd, if the first was such fail?
Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-01-18 18:23:37)
Yes. That's redundancy. It's not backup.FloppY_ wrote:
Will you just shut the fuck up?mikkel wrote:
Then you're less than clever. You are aware of what the 'R' stands for, right? It doesn't stand for "backup," because RAID isn't backup.FloppY_ wrote:
RAID1 = Mirror
If one drive dies, I only have to replace it, and no data will be lost since the other drive has the same data...
I'd call that the same as doing a on-pc backup on a seperate disc...
Is it not true that if one drive dies and I have two in RAID1 I can replace said drive and move on like NOTHING ever happened?
HDD failures can be seen when you get BSOD, slow write/read times, odd noises coming from the hdd, etc etcFloppY_ wrote:
EDIT: you say you can tell? Do you mean by all your files starting to corrupt? lol...
Harddrives seem to go from fine to fucked for me skipping anything in betweenAussieReaper wrote:
HDD failures can be seen when you get BSOD, slow write/read times, odd noises coming from the hdd, etc etcFloppY_ wrote:
EDIT: you say you can tell? Do you mean by all your files starting to corrupt? lol...
It do not take a genius to view that.
Seriously mikkel, just shut the hell up. You're arguing over a VERY technical meaning of a word when essentially, they're the same with perhaps only a small difference in how one goes about executing the method to achieve the result.mikkel wrote:
Yes. That's redundancy. It's not backup.
RAID1 inb4 U MAD?Finray wrote:
Woot, HDD is here...
No idea what I'm gonna do with it. Currently got about 1TB free HDD space already. Time to add another 500GB to that.
There are other threads on this forum in which the detailed reasons for why RAID isn't backup are spelled out so that even idiots can understand it. Some idiots, at least. To suggest that RAID is "essentially the same" as a backup suggests that you have absolutely no idea about what you're trying to lecture others on.CapnNismo wrote:
Seriously mikkel, just shut the hell up. You're arguing over a VERY technical meaning of a word when essentially, they're the same with perhaps only a small difference in how one goes about executing the method to achieve the result.mikkel wrote:
Yes. That's redundancy. It's not backup.
Last edited by mikkel (2011-01-19 07:40:32)