Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5616|London, England

burnzz wrote:

Uzique wrote:

i don't understand why people are making this a partisan-political thing... it's a shame

the guy is clearly fucking nuts. conspiracy theories don't really ally with left/right wing mainstream politics.
but that's the thing, both political parties have crowbars and are trying to fit the conspiracy theories into their partisan beliefs. like any time you use a crowbar, it's not efficient, it takes alot of force, and something's bound to get broken.
The politicization of this country over the past 11 years is fucking ridiculous. Maybe I was too young at the time and never noticed it was always like this, but I blame it on the rise of the 24 hour news channels and the zombies they have spawned. They make it seem like everyone is at each others throats but in reality it's like 15% Dem and 15% Rep yelling at each other while the other 70% of us wave middle fingers at both of them

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2011-01-11 09:35:48)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
west-phoenix-az
Guns don't kill people. . . joe bidens advice does
+632|6647

presidentsheep wrote:

west-phoenix-az wrote:

Sorry if this interview was already posted.
This man was near and armed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-3GTwalrGY
How is that guy a hero?
First thing he said is he was carrying a gun to and was therefore "more prepared", that to me just seems like he was wanting something like this to happen in order to be able to shoot someone. He then runs over to where people had already subdued the gunman and grabs one of them. He even says the guy wasn't struggling and was under control, why label this guy a hero? Seems just lucky that he didn't cause more problems.

edit: the guy even says he took the safety off and was prepared to shoot someone, what if whoever had subdued the guy was carrying the gun and wasn't involved in that struggle, that would have added another body to this. Throw more people with guns into a problem and I don't see how it ends up any way but more people getting killed.
I never called him a hero. I guess people are calling him a hero because he came to aid, rather than flee like most would. Had he ran into a burning building to help someone I don't think you'd be questioning why he is being called a hero. Either way he put himself in possible harms way to help others.

what if, what if.... we can what if all day. The fact remains that this armed man was present and prepared to fire, yet he didn't complicate the situation. Had the gunman been able to reload and continue firing, this man may have been the one to put an end to it. If you carry a gun you need to identify your target before firing. The shooter may be an undercover police officer or a victim returning fire - you don't know. I believe most people carry a firearm to defend themselves, family and friends. Trying to defend someone else can be very tricky and dangerous, so you approach it with great caution. Apparently this man was able to identify the situation well enough to not shoot the wrong person(s). I can't say the same for police.
https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6257|Vortex Ring State

west-phoenix-az wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

west-phoenix-az wrote:

Sorry if this interview was already posted.
This man was near and armed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-3GTwalrGY
How is that guy a hero?
First thing he said is he was carrying a gun to and was therefore "more prepared", that to me just seems like he was wanting something like this to happen in order to be able to shoot someone. He then runs over to where people had already subdued the gunman and grabs one of them. He even says the guy wasn't struggling and was under control, why label this guy a hero? Seems just lucky that he didn't cause more problems.

edit: the guy even says he took the safety off and was prepared to shoot someone, what if whoever had subdued the guy was carrying the gun and wasn't involved in that struggle, that would have added another body to this. Throw more people with guns into a problem and I don't see how it ends up any way but more people getting killed.
I never called him a hero. I guess people are calling him a hero because he came to aid, rather than flee like most would. Had he ran into a burning building to help someone I don't think you'd be questioning why he is being called a hero. Either way he put himself in possible harms way to help others.

what if, what if.... we can what if all day. The fact remains that this armed man was present and prepared to fire, yet he didn't complicate the situation. Had the gunman been able to reload and continue firing, this man may have been the one to put an end to it. If you carry a gun you need to identify your target before firing. The shooter may be an undercover police officer or a victim returning fire - you don't know. I believe most people carry a firearm to defend themselves, family and friends. Trying to defend someone else can be very tricky and dangerous, so you approach it with great caution. Apparently this man was able to identify the situation well enough to not shoot the wrong person(s). I can't say the same for police.
pretty much true, most people who carry don't "he was wanting something like this to happen in order to be able to shoot someone.", well you get what I mean

Last edited by Trotskygrad (2011-01-11 10:25:53)

presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6219|Places 'n such

west-phoenix-az wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

west-phoenix-az wrote:

Sorry if this interview was already posted.
This man was near and armed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-3GTwalrGY
How is that guy a hero?
First thing he said is he was carrying a gun to and was therefore "more prepared", that to me just seems like he was wanting something like this to happen in order to be able to shoot someone. He then runs over to where people had already subdued the gunman and grabs one of them. He even says the guy wasn't struggling and was under control, why label this guy a hero? Seems just lucky that he didn't cause more problems.

edit: the guy even says he took the safety off and was prepared to shoot someone, what if whoever had subdued the guy was carrying the gun and wasn't involved in that struggle, that would have added another body to this. Throw more people with guns into a problem and I don't see how it ends up any way but more people getting killed.
I never called him a hero. I guess people are calling him a hero because he came to aid, rather than flee like most would. Had he ran into a burning building to help someone I don't think you'd be questioning why he is being called a hero. Either way he put himself in possible harms way to help others.

what if, what if.... we can what if all day. The fact remains that this armed man was present and prepared to fire, yet he didn't complicate the situation. Had the gunman been able to reload and continue firing, this man may have been the one to put an end to it. If you carry a gun you need to identify your target before firing. The shooter may be an undercover police officer or a victim returning fire - you don't know. I believe most people carry a firearm to defend themselves, family and friends. Trying to defend someone else can be very tricky and dangerous, so you approach it with great caution. Apparently this man was able to identify the situation well enough to not shoot the wrong person(s). I can't say the same for police.
I'd say his judgement of the situation was based more on luck than anything else.
Carrying a gun and running into situations like this is like running into a burning building but carrying a bag labelled "loot". Seems to me that carrying a handgun in public is more about penis size and fear than protection, like the guy said, he was prepared to kill someone. Not tackle someone to the ground or to risk injury saving someone's life but to actually kill someone. What does that say about his attitude if that's the first reaction he jumps to?
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
krazed
Admiral of the Bathtub
+619|7038|Great Brown North

presidentsheep wrote:

he was prepared to kill someone. Not tackle someone to the ground or to risk injury saving someone's life but to actually kill someone. What does that say about his attitude if that's the first reaction he jumps to?
you would tackle an armed person assaulting someone?

braver man than I
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6219|Places 'n such

krazed wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

he was prepared to kill someone. Not tackle someone to the ground or to risk injury saving someone's life but to actually kill someone. What does that say about his attitude if that's the first reaction he jumps to?
you would tackle an armed person assaulting someone?

braver man than I
Never said that, i'd probably shit myself and cry. Then again I don't really expect to shoot or be shot at, the thing i'm saying is that that guy left the house that day carrying a gun that he was prepared to use to kill someone, to me that mentality seems wrong.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6441|Ireland

presidentsheep wrote:

krazed wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

he was prepared to kill someone. Not tackle someone to the ground or to risk injury saving someone's life but to actually kill someone. What does that say about his attitude if that's the first reaction he jumps to?
you would tackle an armed person assaulting someone?

braver man than I
Never said that, i'd probably shit myself and cry. Then again I don't really expect to shoot or be shot at, the thing i'm saying is that that guy left the house that day carrying a gun that he was prepared to use to kill someone, to me that mentality seems wrong.
I appologize Lowing.  After reading Sheeps posts I realize you are 100% correct in your posts earlier about the "run and pray" and everything else.

Even when someone is at one of their rallies with a gun to protect them, they just fear that person too.  meh.  Liberalism.
west-phoenix-az
Guns don't kill people. . . joe bidens advice does
+632|6647
x

Last edited by west-phoenix-az (2011-01-11 10:37:03)

https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6663|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

burnzz wrote:

Uzique wrote:

i don't understand why people are making this a partisan-political thing... it's a shame

the guy is clearly fucking nuts. conspiracy theories don't really ally with left/right wing mainstream politics.
but that's the thing, both political parties have crowbars and are trying to fit the conspiracy theories into their partisan beliefs. like any time you use a crowbar, it's not efficient, it takes alot of force, and something's bound to get broken.
The politicization of this country over the past 11 years is fucking ridiculous. Maybe I was too young at the time and never noticed it was always like this, but I blame it on the rise of the 24 hour news channels and the zombies they have spawned. They make it seem like everyone is at each others throats but in reality it's like 15% Dem and 15% Rep yelling at each other while the other 70% of us wave middle fingers at both of them
Pretty much...  One of the bigger problems with our system is that, at most, only 60% of the electorate votes, so appealing to wingnuts will get you a lot of power.
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6219|Places 'n such

Lotta_Drool wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

krazed wrote:


you would tackle an armed person assaulting someone?

braver man than I
Never said that, i'd probably shit myself and cry. Then again I don't really expect to shoot or be shot at, the thing i'm saying is that that guy left the house that day carrying a gun that he was prepared to use to kill someone, to me that mentality seems wrong.
I appologize Lowing.  After reading Sheeps posts I realize you are 100% correct in your posts earlier about the "run and pray" and everything else.

Even when someone is at one of their rallies with a gun to protect them, they just fear that person too.  meh.  Liberalism.
Great solution, instead of no-one being afraid of being shot now everyone is!
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6441|Ireland

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

burnzz wrote:


but that's the thing, both political parties have crowbars and are trying to fit the conspiracy theories into their partisan beliefs. like any time you use a crowbar, it's not efficient, it takes alot of force, and something's bound to get broken.
The politicization of this country over the past 11 years is fucking ridiculous. Maybe I was too young at the time and never noticed it was always like this, but I blame it on the rise of the 24 hour news channels and the zombies they have spawned. They make it seem like everyone is at each others throats but in reality it's like 15% Dem and 15% Rep yelling at each other while the other 70% of us wave middle fingers at both of them
Pretty much...  One of the bigger problems with our system is that, at most, only 60% of the electorate votes, so appealing to wingnuts will get you a lot of power.
I don't vote because my vote is drowned out by the rejects of society and I don't want to have to dodge jury duty and shit.

The US should have simple voting requirements.  1. highschool diploma or GED.  2. Current or Previous Military Service.  3. A fulltime Job that is not funded by taxes.

This would fix all problems with the US government is record time.
13rin
Member
+977|6737

presidentsheep wrote:

I'd say his judgement of the situation was based more on luck than anything else.
Carrying a gun and running into situations like this is like running into a burning building but carrying a bag labelled "loot". Seems to me that carrying a handgun in public is more about penis size and fear than protection, like the guy said, he was prepared to kill someone. Not tackle someone to the ground or to risk injury saving someone's life but to actually kill someone. What does that say about his attitude if that's the first reaction he jumps to?
How was it his first reaction... Yet he didn't shoot the guy?  You better not carry a gun if you aren't prepaired to use deadly force.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6219|Places 'n such

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


The politicization of this country over the past 11 years is fucking ridiculous. Maybe I was too young at the time and never noticed it was always like this, but I blame it on the rise of the 24 hour news channels and the zombies they have spawned. They make it seem like everyone is at each others throats but in reality it's like 15% Dem and 15% Rep yelling at each other while the other 70% of us wave middle fingers at both of them
Pretty much...  One of the bigger problems with our system is that, at most, only 60% of the electorate votes, so appealing to wingnuts will get you a lot of power.
I don't vote because my vote is drowned out by the rejects of society and I don't want to have to dodge jury duty and shit.

The US should have simple voting requirements.  1. highschool diploma or GED.  2. Current or Previous Military Service.  3. A fulltime Job that is not funded by taxes.

This would fix all problems with the US government is record time.
Have you tried 19th century Britain perchance? You'd love it.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6219|Places 'n such

DBBrinson1 wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

I'd say his judgement of the situation was based more on luck than anything else.
Carrying a gun and running into situations like this is like running into a burning building but carrying a bag labelled "loot". Seems to me that carrying a handgun in public is more about penis size and fear than protection, like the guy said, he was prepared to kill someone. Not tackle someone to the ground or to risk injury saving someone's life but to actually kill someone. What does that say about his attitude if that's the first reaction he jumps to?
How was it his first reaction... Yet he didn't shoot the guy?  You better not carry a gun if you aren't prepaired to use deadly force.
Did you listen to the interview? He took the safety off and had his hand on the gun before he'd even seen what was going on, he said in the interview he was prepared to kill someone. That shouldn't be an option in a civilised society. It is not an individual's role to decide who lives and who dies.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|6925

JahManRed wrote:

I have no problems with a kid learning how to hunt. My dad taught me how to hunt. But I cannot epahise the importance he put on respecting the gun. (my uncle killed himself by leaning his gun on a fence. Climbing the fence. The barb wire pulled the trigger and shot him dead) He taught me to repsect your prey. He made me skin and gut the mountain Goat I shot. I had to follow the whole thing through. I had to see what I shot up close, I had to watch its last breath, carry it soaking myself in blood. It all had a profound effect on me. Pulling the trigger was the easy part. Its what happens after that has a lasting effect. You can train people to pull the trigger, but what happens after................
Early on as a kid, I've picked out animals to slaughter.  Chickens beheaded continuing to flap about.  Goats hung up, throat slashed, blood collected on a pan, and torched to remove the hairs.  Pigs tied up, throat slashed, blood collected, gutted, innards separated, head roasted separately.  Cattle picked out at a range, caged, bullet to the head.  My boys have seen most of the same things done, save for cattle.  Cattle is just way too expensive these days to just do on a whim.

No lasting effect on me.  And doesn't seem so for my kids as they've never mentioned the kills themselves again.  The lasting impression for both me and the kids, though, the great taste of fresh kill.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6441|Ireland

DBBrinson1 wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

I'd say his judgement of the situation was based more on luck than anything else.
Carrying a gun and running into situations like this is like running into a burning building but carrying a bag labelled "loot". Seems to me that carrying a handgun in public is more about penis size and fear than protection, like the guy said, he was prepared to kill someone. Not tackle someone to the ground or to risk injury saving someone's life but to actually kill someone. What does that say about his attitude if that's the first reaction he jumps to?
How was it his first reaction... Yet he didn't shoot the guy?  You better not carry a gun if you aren't prepaired to use deadly force.
Some people have a hard time imagining being at the scene of a mass shooting with a bunch of bodies lying around.  The sheep just pictures a guy laying on the ground with a couple people on him, not the fact that people are bleeding out everywhere and the screaming and the shooting and the crying.

Yeah sheep, you would grab the gun and take the safety off if you see people getting murdered, 22 of them I think. And yes, you would imediately think about returning fire on the person killing everyone around you. 

or Oh look, there is an 8 year old blowing blood bubbles gasping for breath in convulsions. I think I'll wet myself now and black out.

meh.
west-phoenix-az
Guns don't kill people. . . joe bidens advice does
+632|6647
OK, you are armed.
You have a pistol on your hip.
You hear a string of shots fired in close proximately.
QUICK! What do you do???

A. shit your pants and cry
2. pick your nose
C. check for your pistol and prepare to use it if need be
https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6219|Places 'n such
Option D: learn the difference between the alphabet and numbers then move to a country where I don't risk getting shot.

Just out of curiosity, how many of you have actually been in the situation where you've shot someone? Or are you just basing your reaction on hours clocked up on video games and penis waggling internet bravado?

Last edited by presidentsheep (2011-01-11 11:05:27)

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6441|Ireland
Is this multiple choice?
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6441|Ireland

presidentsheep wrote:

Option D: learn the difference between the alphabet and numbers then move to a country where I don't risk getting shot.
you are either trolling or a care bear.

don't think care bears exist.
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|6917|BC, Canada

west-phoenix-az wrote:

OK, you are armed.
You have a pistol on your hip.
You hear a string of shots fired in close proximately.
QUICK! What do you do???

A. shit your pants and cry
2. pick your nose
C. check for your pistol and prepare to use it if need be
Ok, as jahman said earlier in the thread, once you have obviously chosen C as it seems you would.

You go over to attempt to help, and there are several other gun carriers who do the same.
Since you have only heard the shots and have no idea whats going on, who do you subdue, do you trust them to not shoot you and handle the situation properly.

Yes, having a gun could potentially help, it also could potentially make things much worse.
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6219|Places 'n such

Lotta_Drool wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

Option D: learn the difference between the alphabet and numbers then move to a country where I don't risk getting shot.
you are either trolling or a care bear.

don't think care bears exist.
Neither do trolls, though I can see by your reactions that it's completely plausible that you still believe in fairy tales.

Since this logic of arming everyone is so flawless, why don't we apply it on a global scale? Arm every single country in the world with nuclear weapons.

Last edited by presidentsheep (2011-01-11 11:14:23)

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,741|6995|Cinncinatti

presidentsheep wrote:

Option D: learn the difference between the alphabet and numbers then move to a country where I don't risk getting shot.
/facepalm
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
krazed
Admiral of the Bathtub
+619|7038|Great Brown North

Nic wrote:

west-phoenix-az wrote:

OK, you are armed.
You have a pistol on your hip.
You hear a string of shots fired in close proximately.
QUICK! What do you do???

A. shit your pants and cry
2. pick your nose
C. check for your pistol and prepare to use it if need be
Ok, as jahman said earlier in the thread, once you have obviously chosen C as it seems you would.

You go over to attempt to help, and there are several other gun carriers who do the same.
Since you have only heard the shots and have no idea whats going on, who do you subdue, do you trust them to not shoot you and handle the situation properly.

Yes, having a gun could potentially help, it also could potentially make things much worse.
which is why he didn't pull it and start firing


hey sheep, let me know when someone punches your girlfriend in the face and pulls a knife on you, have fun cowering in fear

unfortunately thanks to people like you, i no longer have the option to defend myself with reasonable means... so i lost everything i was carrying that night and had to watch her cry and bleed

personally i would rather have shot that piece of shit to death than have to try to comfort her at the hospital after.... but hey whatever floats your boat buddy
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6219|Places 'n such

krazed wrote:

Nic wrote:

west-phoenix-az wrote:

OK, you are armed.
You have a pistol on your hip.
You hear a string of shots fired in close proximately.
QUICK! What do you do???

A. shit your pants and cry
2. pick your nose
C. check for your pistol and prepare to use it if need be
Ok, as jahman said earlier in the thread, once you have obviously chosen C as it seems you would.

You go over to attempt to help, and there are several other gun carriers who do the same.
Since you have only heard the shots and have no idea whats going on, who do you subdue, do you trust them to not shoot you and handle the situation properly.

Yes, having a gun could potentially help, it also could potentially make things much worse.
which is why he didn't pull it and start firing


hey sheep, let me know when someone punches your girlfriend in the face and pulls a knife on you, have fun cowering in fear

unfortunately thanks to people like you, i no longer have the option to defend myself with reasonable means... so i lost everything i was carrying that night and had to watch her cry and bleed

personally i would rather have shot that piece of shit to death than have to try to comfort her at the hospital after.... but hey whatever floats your boat buddy
Ok, so you value human life less than the contents of your wallet? Last time I got in a fight I broke the guys nose and cheekbone, it was unnecessary. If anyone in that situation had a gun someone probably would have died, why exactly does that make the situation any better? Murder is somehow justified by your emotional state at the time?

edit: absolutely nothing you said actually constitutes "reasonable means" shooting someone and killing them is in no way reasonable. How does make you any different from the guy who went on this spree in the first place?

Last edited by presidentsheep (2011-01-11 11:31:05)

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard