Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6682|North Carolina

Ticia wrote:

See? I find them all beautiful so...one more time, sizes are not important at all.
Curvy and fat seem to be very similar.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6408|North Tonawanda, NY

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

See? I find them all beautiful so...one more time, sizes are not important at all.
Curvy and fat seem to be very similar.
There is a slight difference...but yea, they are.  It's also hard to tell the difference between 'thin' and 'normal', but that's because of the clothes the women are wearing.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5514|Cleveland, Ohio

Ticia wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Ticia wrote:


That is obese here.

Someone who looks like this is on the fat side
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/5351 … c8f0c6.jpg

By the way she's gorgeous so I'm not saying fat can't be beautiful or anything like that.
lol that is fat?  you mad?
She's drop dead gorgeous but she is fat.


I'll give you my definition though I do know all these girls are probably thinner than on the pics.

Skinny

http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/8909 … achpcn.jpg

Thin

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/3331 … firooz.jpg

Normal

http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/203/ … iel01l.jpg

Curvy

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/1558 … ashian.jpg

Fat

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/779/sophiedahl.jpg

Obese

http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/6843 … depeso.jpg


See? I find them all beautiful so...one more time, sizes are not important at all.
kim kard is fat.....but i see your point.
Ticia
Member
+73|5613

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

See? I find them all beautiful so...one more time, sizes are not important at all.
Curvy and fat seem to be very similar.
Look at her pot belly. Kim is curvaceous, Sophie Dahl is (or better was) fatty.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6682|North Carolina

Ticia wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

See? I find them all beautiful so...one more time, sizes are not important at all.
Curvy and fat seem to be very similar.
Look at her pot belly. Kim is curvaceous, Sophie Dahl is (or better was) fatty.
I guess it just seems strange that the main difference between curvy and fat is that curvy has bigger boobs.

I mean, now that I think about it, I suppose that's true to an extent.
Ticia
Member
+73|5613

11 Bravo wrote:

Ticia wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

lol that is fat?  you mad?
She's drop dead gorgeous but she is fat.


I'll give you my definition though I do know all these girls are probably thinner than on the pics.

Skinny

http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/8909 … achpcn.jpg

Thin

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/3331 … firooz.jpg

Normal

http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/203/ … iel01l.jpg

Curvy

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/1558 … ashian.jpg

Fat

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/779/sophiedahl.jpg

Obese

http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/6843 … depeso.jpg


See? I find them all beautiful so...one more time, sizes are not important at all.
kim kard is fat.....but i see your point.
She's more fat than Christina Hendricks? Who's mad now? 
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5514|Cleveland, Ohio
she is
Ticia
Member
+73|5613

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Curvy and fat seem to be very similar.
Look at her pot belly. Kim is curvaceous, Sophie Dahl is (or better was) fatty.
I guess it just seems strange that the main difference between curvy and fat is that curvy has bigger boobs.

I mean, now that I think about it, I suppose that's true to an extent.
No. Boobs seem bigger when you're thinner that's all.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5514|Cleveland, Ohio
try some non pro photos of her

https://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kim-kardashian-bikini.jpg
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6682|North Carolina

11 Bravo wrote:

she is
Nah, Kardashian is thinner along the waist.

I suppose if you were to compare the two, Hendricks is fatter -- but only in a relative sense.

For example, I'm fatter than an Ethiopian.

EDIT:  ok, nevermind...   maybe you're right.

Last edited by Turquoise (2010-10-29 07:36:06)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6682|North Carolina

Ticia wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:


Look at her pot belly. Kim is curvaceous, Sophie Dahl is (or better was) fatty.
I guess it just seems strange that the main difference between curvy and fat is that curvy has bigger boobs.

I mean, now that I think about it, I suppose that's true to an extent.
No. Boobs seem bigger when you're thinner that's all.
damn optical illusions...  lol
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6408|North Tonawanda, NY

11 Bravo wrote:

try some non pro photos of her

http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kim … bikini.jpg
Kinda hard to trust modern pics with photoshop and all...

Ticia
Member
+73|5613

SenorToenails wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

try some non pro photos of her

http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kim … bikini.jpg
Kinda hard to trust modern pics with photoshop and all...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFwFOH6h4lo
Guys, I said the pics are just an eg. I never seen any of those girls in person
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6408|North Tonawanda, NY

Ticia wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

try some non pro photos of her

http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/kim … bikini.jpg
Kinda hard to trust modern pics with photoshop and all...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFwFOH6h4lo
Guys, I said the pics are just an eg. I never seen any of those girls in person
hahaha, I know you said that!  That was a response to what 11b said. 

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard