Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6593

ghettoperson wrote:

I hate to do this to you, but a quick summary? The video won't load for me.
Its a cartoon of two cute South Park Looking Bears Talking. One is trashing O'Donnell in a Condescending tone,
the Other is mindlessly repeating " I want a Conservative " like a robot. Edgy stuff !
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5597|London, England

ghettoperson wrote:

I hate to do this to you, but a quick summary? The video won't load for me.
Here, I wrote out the conversation. It's between two computer generated cartoon guys talking to each other:

"Where is the true conservative? I need to vote for the true conservative."

"Oh, I'm sorry, this is Delaware. We have only one RINO and one woefully unqualified conservative candidate."

"I want the true conservative"

"But she hasn't had a full time job in five years."

"I don't care"

"She just got her bachelor's degree last week"

"I don't care"

"She thinks political opponents are hiding in her bushes and accused them of vandalizing her house without proof"

"I don't care. That is a smear"

"That is a quote"

"I don't care.

"She's running 26 points further behind the Democrat than the RINO."

"I don't care. She is a true conservative"

"She sued a conservative organization for gender discrimination asking six million in damages"

"I don't care. I can relate to her"

"She's paying half her rent with campaign donations"

"I don't care."

"Are you a fan of professional politicians?"

"No. Of course not. That's why I will vote for the true conservative"

"She's a professional politician, she's just really fucking bad at it"

"I'm on a RINO hunt with Mark Lavin. Vote for the true conservative" *Thumbs up*

*jaw dropped*
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6593
THANX !
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|6855|do not disturb

JohnG@lt wrote:

Phrozenbot wrote:

So put in a Republican who might, if they are feeling merciful and principled enough, act moderately conservative? I would rather attempt to vote in a Republican who is more principled than someone who isn't. The establishment, both (R) and (D), have both done a wonderful job of ruining this country. The republican strategist rhetoric is old now.
Depends on what's more important to you. She hasn't shown that she's fiscally conservative, only socially uber-conservative. If she gets elected she'll try to launch some stupid moral crusade and vote the party line on economic issues because she's too stupid to understand them. I fail to see how that is a win by any means.
Then I guess she is another Scott Brown? I haven't been following her, only that I hear the incumbent was another entrenched big government establishment type being thrown out. If she isn't any better then I guess you're right there isn't much of a victory.
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5498|foggy bottom
she also said she's studied at oxford
Tu Stultus Es
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5597|London, England

Phrozenbot wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Phrozenbot wrote:

So put in a Republican who might, if they are feeling merciful and principled enough, act moderately conservative? I would rather attempt to vote in a Republican who is more principled than someone who isn't. The establishment, both (R) and (D), have both done a wonderful job of ruining this country. The republican strategist rhetoric is old now.
Depends on what's more important to you. She hasn't shown that she's fiscally conservative, only socially uber-conservative. If she gets elected she'll try to launch some stupid moral crusade and vote the party line on economic issues because she's too stupid to understand them. I fail to see how that is a win by any means.
Then I guess she is another Scott Brown? I haven't been following her, only that I hear the incumbent was another entrenched big government establishment type being thrown out. If she isn't any better then I guess you're right there isn't much of a victory.
No. She's a zillion times worse than Scott Brown. At least he has a head on his shoulders and a modicum of fiscal background. She's a brainless zealot talking head. It's worse than picking Palin.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-09-17 10:02:02)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6644|North Carolina

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

What drew me towards him was how they immediately and relentlessly attacked him on every dam thing.
If you can appreciate the absurdity of Bush Derangement Syndrome, then you should be able to acknowledgement the same concerning the current Obama Derangement Syndrome.
What people should take out of this is that Politics as usual, compromise and sell outs may not carry the day. It was after all, Bidens State.

They thought it was their birth right, They're indigent, they didn't even send acknowledgement of congratulations. They are acting like petulant pouting children.

It may do you well to look into the backgrounds of some of the Appointees, Tsars and Supreme Court Justices. Their Quotes, Hero's, Books, Writings, Beliefs and Histories. With the same zeal. This is no longer of case of " They're a bunch of fat cat out to make money they must be evil !These people have defined themselves for you. You just have to look a little bit and decide if you like what you see.
Brown's opponent clearly thought she deserved her seat by default.  I get that.  She was an idiot for not campaigning.

Any politician that takes their seat for granted is either idiotic or so well gerrymandered that elections don't matter.
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|6855|do not disturb

That bad huh? Remind me to never ever give the tea party the benefit of the doubt again.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6644|North Carolina

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

I didn't try and Defend her, I just asked " by what mark do you measure ? " Why do I have the feeling people would be more tolerant if she was perhaps a muslim. I think below this is your view in its summation.
Some liberal hypocrites would give her a pass if she was Muslim.  I wouldn't though.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5597|London, England

Phrozenbot wrote:

That bad huh? Remind me to never ever give the tea party the benefit of the doubt again.
I don't think you understand how far the tea party has traveled from its roots. What started as a fiscally conservative group pissed about federal spending has morphed into a catch-all for the disenfranchised crazies of this country. Birthers, Birchers etc. The tea party is now the populist landing pad for stupid people who feel they should be heard.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5597|London, England
It has been manipulated and morphed by professional manipulators, the media on the right.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6593

eleven bravo wrote:

she also said she's studied at oxford
I studied at Yale ! I read a book in The Yale Bowl Parking lot when worked for the R.R.
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6593
" The media on the right " - FOX -  Just how many Major Networks are there ?
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|6855|do not disturb

JohnG@lt wrote:

Phrozenbot wrote:

That bad huh? Remind me to never ever give the tea party the benefit of the doubt again.
I don't think you understand how far the tea party has traveled from its roots. What started as a fiscally conservative group pissed about federal spending has morphed into a catch-all for the disenfranchised crazies of this country. Birthers, Birchers etc. The tea party is now the populist landing pad for stupid people who feel they should be heard.
So they they are replacing Castle for all the right reasons, just with someone much worse? I just visited her site and it is simply a donation page. Nothing else. No platform section, bio, etc.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5597|London, England

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

" The media on the right " - FOX -  Just how many Major Networks are there ?
Which network is championing the Tea Party movement? Which network has hosts holding rallies in Washington DC? The Tea Party has been co-opted by the same wingnuts and conspiracy theorists that lap up everything Fox has to say. The previously mentioned host even calls himself a libertarian instead of what he really is, a neocon. So now there's a whole bunch of fuckwit neocons running around calling themselves libertarians. Thanks Beck.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5597|London, England

Phrozenbot wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Phrozenbot wrote:

That bad huh? Remind me to never ever give the tea party the benefit of the doubt again.
I don't think you understand how far the tea party has traveled from its roots. What started as a fiscally conservative group pissed about federal spending has morphed into a catch-all for the disenfranchised crazies of this country. Birthers, Birchers etc. The tea party is now the populist landing pad for stupid people who feel they should be heard.
So they they are replacing Castle for all the right reasons, just with someone much worse? I just visited her site and it is simply a donation page. Nothing else. No platform section, bio, etc.
Yes. Check out her wikipedia page.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6593

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

" The media on the right " - FOX -  Just how many Major Networks are there ?
? ? ?

JohnG@lt wrote:

Which network is championing the Tea Party movement?
I believe FOX covered the Demonstrations. I watched other Networks explain the Meaning of the Demonstrations for me as 
" Divisive, Dangerous, Racist, Out of Touch " and much more derogatory terms.
It made me sad as there were many Veterans among them. I felt they deserved better treatment.
Personally I just need to know what happened, not what to think. Draw your own conclusions.
          So I actually went to a Tea Party Rally ( about 30 miles from were I live ).
No " Dangerous, Racists ". "Divisive, Out of Touch " ? I will generously say, That's subjective and point of view.
But They did lie to me, The Major Networks ( I  knew. I kinda suspect you do also )
So I made Video. Do you want to see it ? To see for yourself ? I know you always shy away of second hand News.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Which network has hosts holding rallies in Washington DC?
I believe Radio and T.V. Personality/host Glen Beck did that ( as you state below ) are you saying FOX Financed it or advertised it ? Please show me, as that was not my observation. Just to name Two, do " The View " and " Oprah " Broad Cast from FOX ?

JohnG@lt wrote:

The Tea Party has been co-opted by the same wingnuts and conspiracy theorists that lap up everything Fox has to say.
Derogatory terms and descriptions don't really buttress your point of views the way facts would. I am going to let this one slide with no rebuttal.

JohnG@lt wrote:

The previously mentioned host even calls himself a libertarian instead of what he really is, a neocon.
I believe he is entitled to define himself, as you are. You can prove him wrong and  expose him in this forum. I know in the past you have felt entitled to label me, albeit with limited success.

JohnG@lt wrote:

So now there's a whole bunch of fuckwit neocons running around calling themselves libertarians. Thanks Beck.
I have to say I don't feel its productive to respond to this. All I can really take from it is that you feel proud and entitled to the Label " Libertarian " and feel its feel its your decision as to who can claim it.
I started watching FOX a lot more to see what all the fuss is about.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5597|London, England

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

" The media on the right " - FOX -  Just how many Major Networks are there ?
? ? ?

JohnG@lt wrote:

Which network is championing the Tea Party movement?
I believe FOX covered the Demonstrations. I watched other Networks explain the Meaning of the Demonstrations for me as 
" Divisive, Dangerous, Racist, Out of Touch " and much more derogatory terms.
It made me sad as there were many Veterans among them. I felt they deserved better treatment.
Personally I just need to know what happened, not what to think. Draw your own conclusions.
          So I actually went to a Tea Party Rally ( about 30 miles from were I live ).
No " Dangerous, Racists ". "Divisive, Out of Touch " ? I will generously say, That's subjective and point of view.
But They did lie to me, The Major Networks ( I  knew. I kinda suspect you do also )
So I made Video. Do you want to see it ? To see for yourself ? I know you always shy away of second hand News.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Which network has hosts holding rallies in Washington DC?
I believe Radio and T.V. Personality/host Glen Beck did that ( as you state below ) are you saying FOX Financed it or advertised it ? Please show me, as that was not my observation. Just to name Two, do " The View " and " Oprah " Broad Cast from FOX ?

JohnG@lt wrote:

The Tea Party has been co-opted by the same wingnuts and conspiracy theorists that lap up everything Fox has to say.
Derogatory terms and descriptions don't really buttress your point of views the way facts would. I am going to let this one slide with no rebuttal.

JohnG@lt wrote:

The previously mentioned host even calls himself a libertarian instead of what he really is, a neocon.
I believe he is entitled to define himself, as you are. You can prove him wrong and  expose him in this forum. I know in the past you have felt entitled to label me, albeit with limited success.

JohnG@lt wrote:

So now there's a whole bunch of fuckwit neocons running around calling themselves libertarians. Thanks Beck.
I have to say I don't feel its productive to respond to this. All I can really take from it is that you feel proud and entitled to the Label " Libertarian " and feel its feel its your decision as to who can claim it.
I started watching FOX a lot more to see what all the fuss is about.
I'm not saying that Delaware speaks for the entirety of the tea party, but this primary has shown that the majority in Delaware are a bunch of fuckwit wingnuts. And fuck you for thinking veterans deserve any more respect after they've gotten out of the military or that it somehow enhances their standing on issues. Most people who join the military are idiots when they go in and idiots when they come out.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-09-17 11:29:34)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6593
That's your opinion but to serve and be told by people you protected your not trust worthy is pretty weak in my opinion. You must have missed all my posts. No problem. the Four letter words? Thats something that floats here. I try to talk the way I would if I wanted to be taken seriously. Further No one I know was an Idiot who served. I don't count people I met at the Entrance test. They weren't in yet,  Most of the people I know were drafted.

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2010-09-17 14:02:08)

Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5597|London, England

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

That's your opinion but to serve and be told be people you protected your not trust worthy is pretty weak in my opinion. You must have missed all my posts. No problem. the Four letter words? Thats something that floats here. I try to talk the way I would if I wanted to be taken seriously. Further No one I know was an Idiot who served. I don't count people I met at the Entrance test. They weren't in yet,  Most of the people I know were drafted.
You clearly never served if you don't think the majority that join are retards that would have no shot at anything but the welfare line in the real world.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6593

JohnG@lt wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

That's your opinion but to serve and be told be people you protected your not trust worthy is pretty weak in my opinion. You must have missed all my posts. No problem. the Four letter words? That's something that floats here. I try to talk the way I would if I wanted to be taken seriously. Further No one I know was an Idiot who served. I don't count people I met at the Entrance test. They weren't in yet,  Most of the people I know were drafted.
You clearly never served if you don't think the majority that join are retards that would have no shot at anything but the welfare line in the real world.
Clearly you didn't read my post. Out of the people I know who went in there are

1 Structural Engineer a partner in his firm, very wealthy man.
1 Chrysler top 100 salesman almost every year. owned 3 dealerships - House on an Lake Island in N.J. worth millions now.
2 Two NYC cops
1 Fireman
4 Tele Com workers Fourtune 500 company
2 doctors.
1 Security Company owner
2 Walls street types
3 General contractors One owns his own Island in Long Island Sound.
2 CE Os
Maybe this is more of a comment on what circles we move in. You may be right from your prospective. I still respect the years they gave. Some how you took something else out of it. ( or didn't ) So be it. We thank you anyway.

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2010-09-17 14:21:04)

Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6707
inb4 eleven calls galt a "pog"

Last edited by Doctor Strangelove (2010-09-17 14:30:36)

Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6955

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

inb4 elven calls galt a "pog"
ill go first

JG you were a pog lel
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6736

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

coward or both ?
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6593
5 points and he addressed one, without any real real substance and rife with unwarranted and un-returned insults. Still, You may decide who you want to label and how.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard