BF2S Forums Battle of Britain: in men and machines

jord wrote:

I find Mayan/Aztec/Amazonian tribes to be interesting. Journey south and explore the old world.

yes ..... nothing like sitting around a open fire with a bunch of dudes with their dicks hanging out and bbqing some pig










wait a minute ...... are we talking about some jungle ppl or back in the marines

SEREMAKER wrote:

jord wrote:

I find Mayan/Aztec/Amazonian tribes to be interesting. Journey south and explore the old world.

yes ..... nothing like sitting around a open fire with a bunch of dudes with their dicks hanging out and bbqing some pig










wait a minute ...... are we talking about some jungle ppl or back in the marines

You've raised a valid point. On contemplating the above scenario I've realised uncivilised natives would have no makeup or perfume for their women. Eww.

Then again the mystery and legend that surrounds the Amazon is surely something. Other than the oceans it's probably the least explored part of the planet, with it being so massive.

I want to lead an expedition.

SEREMAKER wrote:

jord wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

yes ..... nothing like sitting around a open fire with a bunch of dudes with their dicks hanging out and bbqing some pig










wait a minute ...... are we talking about some jungle ppl or back in the marines

You've raised a valid point. On contemplating the above scenario I've realised uncivilised natives would have no makeup or perfume for their women. Eww.

Then again the mystery and legend that surrounds the Amazon is surely something. Other than the oceans it's probably the least explored part of the planet, with it being so massive.

I want to lead an expedition.

and with that I will follow you into the depth of the jungles, forging through pirana infested rivers, avoiding spider that are the size of your fist, dodgeing wildlife that see you as a walking meal ..... off we go ............... for the 1st 10 feet or so then I'm turing around and leaving

I'm sure I could find a way to turn a nice profit down there. Be it using the tribal hunters as slave labour or selling lost artifacts once we leave.


Interested now you capitalist American swine?

SEREMAKER wrote:

jord wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

and with that I will follow you into the depth of the jungles, forging through pirana infested rivers, avoiding spider that are the size of your fist, dodgeing wildlife that see you as a walking meal ..... off we go ............... for the 1st 10 feet or so then I'm turing around and leaving

I'm sure I could find a way to turn a nice profit down there. Be it using the tribal hunters as slave labour or selling lost artifacts once we leave.


Interested now you capitalist American swine?

depends ..................... do I get 60% or more

It depends on your investment you shrewd man.


I require

1x air ticket to Brazil
£3000 for expenses
A decent rifle

For that you can have 60% of your investment until you have earned your money back, then the figure drops to 25% on any monetary gains I make.

.Sup wrote:

ok stop the derail, this could be a very interesting topic but this has gone to far into the Amazon forest.

"Battle of Britain"

continue

I don't kinow man, it's nice that ATG has made this topic and all but the discussion is kinda 70 years too late.

jord wrote:

.Sup wrote:

ok stop the derail, this could be a very interesting topic but this has gone to far into the Amazon forest.

"Battle of Britain"

continue

I don't kinow man, it's nice that ATG has made this topic and all but the discussion is kinda 70 years too late.

I wasn't around back then

.Sup wrote:

I always thought US entered the war late so as many as possible communists die

wow, you typed that with a Russian accent.

AussieReaper wrote:

ATG dun goofed.

Why wouldn't you post this in D&ST? You've brought this on yourself.

The discussion is thusfar better here.

ATG wrote:

.Sup wrote:

I always thought US entered the war late so as many as possible communists die

wow, you typed that with a Russian accent.

AussieReaper wrote:

ATG dun goofed.

Why wouldn't you post this in D&ST? You've brought this on yourself.

The discussion is thusfar better here.

yeah, you don't have Lowing blaming the D-Day landings losses on muslims here in EE

Uzique wrote:

ATG wrote:

.Sup wrote:

I always thought US entered the war late so as many as possible communists die

wow, you typed that with a Russian accent.

AussieReaper wrote:

ATG dun goofed.

Why wouldn't you post this in D&ST? You've brought this on yourself.

The discussion is thusfar better here.

yeah, you don't have Lowing blaming the D-Day landings losses on muslims here in EE

if we were to invade today ..... we could use that angle

Uzique wrote:

you wouldn't even get close to launching an invasion.

youths today can't march or run properly with those saggy jeans. we'd pwn ourselves.

then






















a draw ................... none defeated ........... none the victor

Uzique wrote:

ATG wrote:

.Sup wrote:

I always thought US entered the war late so as many as possible communists die

wow, you typed that with a Russian accent.

AussieReaper wrote:

ATG dun goofed.

Why wouldn't you post this in D&ST? You've brought this on yourself.

The discussion is thusfar better here.

yeah, you don't have Lowing blaming the D-Day landings losses on muslims here in EE

lol,nope I don't, just like ya don't have liberals or Muslims blaming the 911 bombings on Muslims.