Again, the establishment clause is the key. They could be told they can't build there as long as it doesn't prevent the free exercise of their religion.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."Stingray24 wrote:
So which part of the Constitution gives a religious group the right to build their place of worship at the site of a national tragedy perpetrated by radicals of said religion? Guess some would argue the establishment clause, but that's free exercise of religion which doesn't require a building.JohnG@lt wrote:
My girlfriend had me watch this today, and while he's very articulate and I find myself nodding along, I still can't shake my belief that the Constitution is paramount and we can't tear it up piece by piece to placate people who are offended.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
The first and third amendments.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
So it's cool if they build a Bloomingdales there and the muslim immam wishes to have a sit in every day?Stingray24 wrote:
Again, the establishment clause is the key. They could be told they can't build there as long as it doesn't prevent the free exercise of their religion.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
The hell with it.
Let 'em build a giant mosque.
Let 'em call it Abu Ali's House of Hate and Jihad Imporium - Death to Yankee Infidels : Over 1 Billion bombed on a big neon sign out front too.
Then let the NSA bug the living crap out of it while it's under construction, plant some good facial recognition camera systems across the street watching the front entrance, perhaps a few Prophet-Hammer systems sniffing out the cellphone traffic in the area, embed a few Agents amongst the staff, etc etc.
TL/DR version: If it's for peaceful purposes, fine, whatever. If it's going to be a hate-mongering terrorist-factory, fine, but make sure the NSA, CIA, FBI, and the rest of the alphabet soup agencies are watching closely.
Let 'em build a giant mosque.
Let 'em call it Abu Ali's House of Hate and Jihad Imporium - Death to Yankee Infidels : Over 1 Billion bombed on a big neon sign out front too.
Then let the NSA bug the living crap out of it while it's under construction, plant some good facial recognition camera systems across the street watching the front entrance, perhaps a few Prophet-Hammer systems sniffing out the cellphone traffic in the area, embed a few Agents amongst the staff, etc etc.
TL/DR version: If it's for peaceful purposes, fine, whatever. If it's going to be a hate-mongering terrorist-factory, fine, but make sure the NSA, CIA, FBI, and the rest of the alphabet soup agencies are watching closely.
Last edited by rdx-fx (2010-08-16 21:07:21)
karma +1Cybargs wrote:
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/7397/m … ewyork.jpg
I'm on board.ATG wrote:
http://vhemt.org/
OK, you guys try it.DrunkFace wrote:
I'm on board.ATG wrote:
http://vhemt.org/
Report back to me on how you get on.
I'll report back on how the earth is with just me on it.
I'd suggest compulsory extreme sports for old people as a start.
Fuck Israel
Damn you, just saw this on Digg and was about to post it when I saw you'd beaten me to it.Cybargs wrote:
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/7397/m … ewyork.jpg
Posted this on page 33 i did! losers.ghettoperson wrote:
Damn you, just saw this on Digg and was about to post it when I saw you'd beaten me to it.Cybargs wrote:
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/7397/m … ewyork.jpg
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 1#p3278421
I'm reading through and I honestly don't know whether I'm meant to take it seriously or not. It seems serious, but now and again there's a gem which just makes me think "Nah that's gotta be deliberate"Dilbert_X wrote:
OK, you guys try it.DrunkFace wrote:
I'm on board.ATG wrote:
http://vhemt.org/
Report back to me on how you get on.
I'll report back on how the earth is with just me on it.
I'd suggest compulsory extreme sports for old people as a start.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
"In fairness, we've been building 'ground zeros' near Iraqi mosques since March 2003. "
true datRoc18 wrote:
"In fairness, we've been building 'ground zeros' near Iraqi mosques since March 2003. "
When the choice is between losing millions of your own people and millions of your enemy's, I'll go with the latter.JohnG@lt wrote:
Indeed. Because of the HBO series "The Pacific", I just finished reading "Helmet For My Pillow" and "With the Old Breed". I dare anyone to read those books, books written through the eyes of two common infantrymen, and state that the shortest route to ending the war wasn't the correct route no matter what the cost.Reciprocity wrote:
It ended the war they started. Yes, we all know how horrific it was, but war, in general, is pretty horrific. What part of surrender did they not understand? And as Turq pointed out, we could have firebombed those cities and achieved the same casualty success. Those two wonderful bombs brought a special, needed clarity to the situation.Jaekus wrote:
Where in that did I say killing 150k civilians is "ok"?
That's right, I didn't. You did though.
we will never apologize for what we did.
It wasn't even limited to us or them, it potentially saved millions of Japanese lives as well.Turquoise wrote:
When the choice is between losing millions of your own people and millions of your enemy's, I'll go with the latter.JohnG@lt wrote:
Indeed. Because of the HBO series "The Pacific", I just finished reading "Helmet For My Pillow" and "With the Old Breed". I dare anyone to read those books, books written through the eyes of two common infantrymen, and state that the shortest route to ending the war wasn't the correct route no matter what the cost.Reciprocity wrote:
It ended the war they started. Yes, we all know how horrific it was, but war, in general, is pretty horrific. What part of surrender did they not understand? And as Turq pointed out, we could have firebombed those cities and achieved the same casualty success. Those two wonderful bombs brought a special, needed clarity to the situation.
we will never apologize for what we did.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Pretty much...JohnG@lt wrote:
It wasn't even limited to us or them, it potentially saved millions of Japanese lives as well.Turquoise wrote:
When the choice is between losing millions of your own people and millions of your enemy's, I'll go with the latter.JohnG@lt wrote:
Indeed. Because of the HBO series "The Pacific", I just finished reading "Helmet For My Pillow" and "With the Old Breed". I dare anyone to read those books, books written through the eyes of two common infantrymen, and state that the shortest route to ending the war wasn't the correct route no matter what the cost.
But:Roc18 wrote:
"In fairness, we've been building 'ground zeros' near Iraqi mosques since March 2003. "
- When we bomb them its in the spirit of freedom and democracy
- When they do it its because they're evil muslims/japs/gooks etc
Fuck Israel
Would've saved far, far, far more Japanese than American lives. I shudder to think of what would've happened when you charge old men and schoolgirls with wooden batons against hardened troops with automatic weapons (which was the plan)Turquoise wrote:
When the choice is between losing millions of your own people and millions of your enemy's, I'll go with the latter.JohnG@lt wrote:
Indeed. Because of the HBO series "The Pacific", I just finished reading "Helmet For My Pillow" and "With the Old Breed". I dare anyone to read those books, books written through the eyes of two common infantrymen, and state that the shortest route to ending the war wasn't the correct route no matter what the cost.Reciprocity wrote:
It ended the war they started. Yes, we all know how horrific it was, but war, in general, is pretty horrific. What part of surrender did they not understand? And as Turq pointed out, we could have firebombed those cities and achieved the same casualty success. Those two wonderful bombs brought a special, needed clarity to the situation.
we will never apologize for what we did.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Still hateful and wrong -but keep on a spewing. We (US TAXPAYERS) have rebuild and saved mosques, recently. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 … d-mosques/Dilbert_X wrote:
But:Roc18 wrote:
"In fairness, we've been building 'ground zeros' near Iraqi mosques since March 2003. "
- When we bomb them its in the spirit of freedom and democracy
- When they do it its because they're evil muslims/japs/gooks etc
I hope they build the mosque and someone blows it the fuck up.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Anyway, never mind mosques, do you know how many Catholic churches there are in NY?
Its this many.
I'll wager the proportion of terrorists amongst Catholics is the same or higher than for Muslims - just look at the IRA, Ustase etc.
And we know the proportion of pedos is waaaaaaaaaaaay higher.
I'd be concerned about that TBH.
Its this many.
I'll wager the proportion of terrorists amongst Catholics is the same or higher than for Muslims - just look at the IRA, Ustase etc.
And we know the proportion of pedos is waaaaaaaaaaaay higher.
I'd be concerned about that TBH.
Fuck Israel
Correct. In a vacuum, one can say "zomg Americans were meanies" but we don't live in a vacuum and the reality is that the 'shock and awe' of the nuclear weapons dropping allowed the Japanese leadership to save face and surrender honorably (in their eyes, because the war was already long lost).Spark wrote:
Would've saved far, far, far more Japanese than American lives. I shudder to think of what would've happened when you charge old men and schoolgirls with wooden batons against hardened troops with automatic weapons (which was the plan)Turquoise wrote:
When the choice is between losing millions of your own people and millions of your enemy's, I'll go with the latter.JohnG@lt wrote:
Indeed. Because of the HBO series "The Pacific", I just finished reading "Helmet For My Pillow" and "With the Old Breed". I dare anyone to read those books, books written through the eyes of two common infantrymen, and state that the shortest route to ending the war wasn't the correct route no matter what the cost.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Only Truman believed that, no-one else did, but lets not start this again....JohnG@lt wrote:
Correct. In a vacuum, one can say "zomg Americans were meanies" but we don't live in a vacuum and the reality is that the 'shock and awe' of the nuclear weapons dropping allowed the Japanese leadership to save face and surrender honorably (in their eyes, because the war was already long lost).
Fuck Israel
About all I read was...Spark wrote:
I'm reading through and I honestly don't know whether I'm meant to take it seriously or not. It seems serious, but now and again there's a gem which just makes me think "Nah that's gotta be deliberate"Dilbert_X wrote:
OK, you guys try it.DrunkFace wrote:
I'm on board.
Report back to me on how you get on.
I'll report back on how the earth is with just me on it.
I'd suggest compulsory extreme sports for old people as a start.
"Phasing out the human race by voluntarily ceasing to breed"
And as my arch nemesi are babies I thought it was a good idea.
Well, if nothing else, it did scare the shit out of the Soviets.Dilbert_X wrote:
Only Truman believed that, no-one else did, but lets not start this again....JohnG@lt wrote:
Correct. In a vacuum, one can say "zomg Americans were meanies" but we don't live in a vacuum and the reality is that the 'shock and awe' of the nuclear weapons dropping allowed the Japanese leadership to save face and surrender honorably (in their eyes, because the war was already long lost).