ATG
Banned
+5,233|6814|Global Command
One thing you can count on when you vote for somebody and that is being disappointed with their actions.

Take for example Bill Clinton: a draft dodging hippy signed into law harsh seizures of property for drug offenses. We all thought mj would be legalized under billy. Instead cops ran around like mad confiscating property and ordering the extermination of religious peoplle in Texas.

George Bush was universally hated by almost everybody with a heartbeat; at best a RINO and more accurately a tax and spend liberal. He let this country go to shit and gave the current clownboy loser in office have a running excuse forgovernment excess.

Barry was to be the po folks pressident, yet he is acting like a typical corporate sheel. He is an elitist, or not liberal enough, depending on who you are.

My point is that I almost think they set out to piss as many people off as they can.
bush was not a good conservative, barry is not a good enough liberal. When was the last time we had a loved president.

Why do national leaders suck so hard?
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6438|what

ATG wrote:

bush was not a good conservative, barry is not a good enough liberal. When was the last time we had a loved president.
Even Lincoln had his detractors.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6807|...

ATG wrote:

Why do national leaders suck so hard?
Because they are human beings.
Wreckognize
Member
+294|6770
Because there's too many people with too many differing opinions so no matter what happens someone will be upset and with our 24/7 media culture they can bitch about it and people will listen.


Do our national leaders really suck more than before or do we just hear more about how much they suck?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard