i'd call parental responsibility not letting a 14 year old get knocked-up out of wedlock.lowing wrote:
Because for better of for worse she is a threat to liberal entitlement. Problem is, they have nothing on her, I mean shit, they tried to make an issue out her writing crib notes on her hands during speeches, while Obama gets a pass by having teleprompter speak for him. Go figure.JohnG@lt wrote:
I don't know why the left is so enraged by her, she's nothing more than the counter to the Obama madness that this country experienced two years ago. His ride to office was fueled by nothing more than emotion. She's doing the exact same thing.lowing wrote:
Now this is an analogy I can buy into.
there was one guy in here trying to make a big deal out of a teenage pregnancy within the Palin family, using this as reason for her lack of parenting skills and leadership. I pointed out that leadership is when you own up to your responsibilities, in Palin case, the family did by keeping the baby. I don't think I got a response to that. All it shows is how desperate they are to bring her down using any means fair or unfair, real or imagined they can.
hastily arranging a 'cover face' marriage afterwards is a trick that hasn't fooled anyone, ever.
besides doesn't her skank whore daughter have like 3 kids from 2 different men now?
if she can't keep teenage hands out of her daughter's panties, she ain't keeping a superpower safe, is she?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/