mtb0minime wrote:
It's been known for a long time that the private sector pays better. It's just that the government has better job security and benefits.
(Well, at least in the engineering industry)
Not any more.
I don't know anybody anymore who makes 200k per year.
The scales have tipped.
• Should the city manager of Bell, a 2.6-square-mile city in Los Angeles County, make $800,000 per year and be guaranteed 12 percent annual raises in the midst of a terrible economy and high private unemployment?
• Should Orange County’s convicted felon ex-sheriff continue to collect at least $217,000 in pension every year until death?
• Should police officers in OC be allowed to retire at the age of 50 and collect 90 percent of their top salary (plus regular cost-of-living raises) for the rest of their lives?
• Should cops and other government retirees be allowed to continue to double-dip—retire from one agency, collect full pension benefits, and then join another government agency to collect another salary and pension?
• Should the public accept that eight in 10 California Highway Patrol officers claim a “disabling injury” to take early retirement perks that include shielding half of their retirement from taxes?
• Should a public pension-investment lobbyist collect “consulting fees” as high as $53 million for a single transaction?
• Should taxpayers have been forced to give a retired OC sanitation-district employee $244,359 in annual pension pay?
• Is it right that Orange County citizens are on the hook to pay more than $3.7 billion in unfunded retirement benefits for county workers? Or that California taxpayers are strapped with a half-trillion-dollar liability for state-government employee pensions?
“It is not the job of individual taxpayers to evaluate the performance of public employees,” says Prevatt, a 2004 delegate to the Democratic National Convention. “That is between the employee and their manager.”
http://www.ocweekly.com/2010-08-05/news … eenhunt/2/