Can't really argue with that whatsoever!
Can't really argue with that whatsoever!
Ramos out, Lahm as right back, Coentrao as left back, Forlan down the middle, Villa down the left.
Ramos was ok, but Lahm was solid and Coentrao was the best left back at this tournament.
Ramos was ok, but Lahm was solid and Coentrao was the best left back at this tournament.
I agree with this... but where the FUCK is Iniesta in that team? I'm sorry but I rate him higher than Schweinsteiger.Surgeons wrote:
Ramos out, Lahm as right back, Coentrao as left back, Forlan down the middle, Villa down the left.
Ramos was ok, but Lahm was solid and Coentrao was the best left back at this tournament.
I'd take Xavi out and put Iniesta. Sweinsteiger had an immense tournament.Zimmer wrote:
I agree with this... but where the FUCK is Iniesta in that team? I'm sorry but I rate him higher than Schweinsteiger.Surgeons wrote:
Ramos out, Lahm as right back, Coentrao as left back, Forlan down the middle, Villa down the left.
Ramos was ok, but Lahm was solid and Coentrao was the best left back at this tournament.
i wouldnt play 3 up front
my team of the world cup
♥
The 2002 world cup teams would destroy their 2010 counterparts
discuss
discuss
Truth, to some extentjord wrote:
The 2002 world cup teams would destroy their 2010 counterparts
discuss
Brazil's team then would rip this team apart.
Spain's 2002 team would get beat.
Germany's 2002 would get absolutely raped.
I would take Sneijder out for Iniesta, they're too similar, but Xavi and Iniesta have got some voodoo telepathy shit going on, and Schweinsteiger would be needed to play a little more defensively.
3 attacking minded midfielders wouldn't work especially when playing 3 up front and having attacking full backs too, you'd be left with just your centre backs defending
3 attacking minded midfielders wouldn't work especially when playing 3 up front and having attacking full backs too, you'd be left with just your centre backs defending
Think of the goals.Surgeons wrote:
I would take Sneijder out for Iniesta, they're too similar, but Xavi and Iniesta have got some voodoo telepathy shit going on, and Schweinsteiger would be needed to play a little more defensively.
3 attacking minded midfielders wouldn't work especially when playing 3 up front and having attacking full backs too, you'd be left with just your centre backs defending
That the team would concede?
Nah other team would never get the ball innitSurgeons wrote:
That the team would concede?
Ahhh sorted. I still think Ronaldo is better than Messi thoughZimmer wrote:
You just agreed with me right there.1927 wrote:
Nah Im sorry Zim we gonna have to disagree on it. I think you were making a point how Holland didnt deserve to be there, I showed how winning all your qualifiers and only loosing the one game (last nights, I think) justifies Holland being there in the final itself. They are today the worlds 2nd best team, until you look at rankings etc. I cant see how showing what Spain have won reflects on Holland and them being in the final, I cant see it, Im not saying your wrong. If Holland hadnt go one all kung fooey and won they today would be deserving winners.
The one thing and most important thing we do agree on is the winner, very deserved I thought. Spain wernt angels last night but I cant remember ever going to a game where both sets of players, or even one set of players played impecibbly (sp). Even last night, Van Bommel (I think) went to return the ball to Spain and sliced it off just before the corner flag, then later someone punted it over a GK's head (corner) and the rightful thing was done then, the ball was just knocked to the GK as he had touched it on its way out.
I said they weren't deserving winners if they had won playing like they did last night. I never said they didn't deserve to be in the final.
no one cares about world cup 2010 anyway, its all about euro 2012, said that ages ago
This is why Im keeping my mouth firmly shut about England coming home early again. England vs Wales in the Euro Qualifiers aint it?SamTheMan wrote:
no one cares about world cup 2010 anyway, its all about euro 2012, said that ages ago
its about 2014 you mean, im not into eurocup.
whos comin to brasil with m3th and me?
i might
I'd come but if I'm not dead in 4 years I'll most likely be homeless, or severely disabled from some kind of failed scam i attempted.
So if you pay, we're on.
So if you pay, we're on.
bf2s tour of Brazil!
i'll probably be going
i'll probably be going
♥
bet you don't when England fail to qualifyToilet Sex wrote:
bf2s tour of Brazil!
i'll probably be going
Depending on who else says their going I might, see what the gusset list looks like first
no uCammRobb wrote:
bet you don't when England fail to qualifyToilet Sex wrote:
bf2s tour of Brazil!
i'll probably be going
♥
hey camm you spelt scotland wrong m8