And I put 2 CPUs in it.FFLink wrote:
Finray's build is surprisingly alright, except for the fact that there's no DVD drive, no aftermarket cooler and he's also gone over budget
![https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png](https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png)
And I put 2 CPUs in it.FFLink wrote:
Finray's build is surprisingly alright, except for the fact that there's no DVD drive, no aftermarket cooler and he's also gone over budget
Last edited by Bevo (2010-07-05 15:17:11)
GPU?
Last edited by Finray (2010-07-05 15:10:10)
failing to see a big difference here chiefFinray wrote:
Over budget again but way better than last time and wayyyy better than Bevos.
http://i45.tinypic.com/2dtq8t1.png
Stock cooler is fine for ~3.2Ghz OC.
E: If you really wanted to have a cooler and under budget swap the 6GB for 4GB.
It has a GPU.Bevo wrote:
failing to see a big difference here chiefFinray wrote:
Over budget again but way better than last time and wayyyy better than Bevos.
http://i45.tinypic.com/2dtq8t1.png
Stock cooler is fine for ~3.2Ghz OC.
E: If you really wanted to have a cooler and under budget swap the 6GB for 4GB.
I edited mine in once I noticed it was missing.alexb wrote:
It has a GPU.Bevo wrote:
failing to see a big difference here chiefFinray wrote:
Over budget again but way better than last time and wayyyy better than Bevos.
http://i45.tinypic.com/2dtq8t1.png
Stock cooler is fine for ~3.2Ghz OC.
E: If you really wanted to have a cooler and under budget swap the 6GB for 4GB.
I got 500w PSU, P55 mobo, i5 750, 4 GB RAM (DDR3, 1333), GTS250, and a Cooler Master case for $880.CammRobb wrote:
lol...ig wrote:
he needs a psu, doesnt need mouse/kb/etc, already has 7
the 800 is just for psu, mobo, cpu, ram, hd, gpu, and case
no chance
I wrote that before you editedBevo wrote:
I edited mine in once I noticed it was missing.alexb wrote:
It has a GPU.Bevo wrote:
failing to see a big difference here chief
but lacks a cooler and isn't sata 6gb/s and lacks a CD drive stillFinray wrote:
I wrote that before you editedBevo wrote:
I edited mine in once I noticed it was missing.alexb wrote:
It has a GPU.
Only real difference now is mine has 2TB space.
Last edited by Bevo (2010-07-05 15:23:37)
Sata 6GB/s makes no difference when you don't give it a Sata 6GB/s drive with it, and it's going to be a long time until Sata 6GB/s is cost-effective. As I said, stock cooler is fine for a moderate overclock, and if he's getting someone else to suggest the parts for it then I doubt he's that confident as to overclocking.Bevo wrote:
but lacks a cooler and isn't sata 6gb/sFinray wrote:
I wrote that before you editedBevo wrote:
I edited mine in once I noticed it was missing.
Only real difference now is mine has 2TB space.
Last edited by Finray (2010-07-05 15:25:04)
There is a SATA 6gb/s drive in my buildFinray wrote:
Sata 6GB/s makes no difference when you don't give it a Sata 6GB/s drive with it, and it's going to be a long time until Sata 6GB/s is cost-effective. As I said, stock cooler is fine for a moderate overclock, and if he's getting someone else to suggest the parts for it then I doubt he's that confident as to overclocking.Bevo wrote:
but lacks a cooler and isn't sata 6gb/sFinray wrote:
I wrote that before you edited
Only real difference now is mine has 2TB space.
Regarding DVD drive, wasn't in the parts list.
it is when finray is doing his "my tech opinion is always right" thingebug9 wrote:
It's not a fucking competition. ig already said he's got enough to work with.
Lol.Bevo wrote:
it is when finray is doing his "my tech opinion is always right" thingebug9 wrote:
It's not a fucking competition. ig already said he's got enough to work with.
Video editing involves accessing multiple media files at the same time. 7200RPM vs 5400RPM would definitely make a difference.Finray wrote:
Didn't notice that
You don't really need speed for a video editing machine, hence why I only put a 5,400 RPM drive in. Pointless to have imo.
agree, a 5400 rpm drive would make a noticeable bottleneckebug9 wrote:
Video editing involves accessing multiple media files at the same time. 7200RPM vs 5400RPM would definitely make a difference.Finray wrote:
Didn't notice that
You don't really need speed for a video editing machine, hence why I only put a 5,400 RPM drive in. Pointless to have imo.
It is hilarious, though, you should get better.Finray wrote:
Lol.Bevo wrote:
it is when finray is doing his "my tech opinion is always right" thingebug9 wrote:
It's not a fucking competition. ig already said he's got enough to work with.
Tbh I'd rather have double the space than a faster drive.jsnipy wrote:
agree, a 5400 rpm drive would make a noticeable bottleneckebug9 wrote:
Video editing involves accessing multiple media files at the same time. 7200RPM vs 5400RPM would definitely make a difference.Finray wrote:
Didn't notice that
You don't really need speed for a video editing machine, hence why I only put a 5,400 RPM drive in. Pointless to have imo.