Your Next car: 62 mpg (86g/km) 65mph (105km) for for $9000 (€7372)

2010-06-29 22:29:54

#1

Harmor: Error_Name_Not_Found; +605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA

https://img24.imageshack.us/img24/7913/t25monster397x224.jpg

https://img84.imageshack.us/img84/8679/t252small2190x107.jpg

https://img59.imageshack.us/img59/9395/t253small2190x107.jpg

Fox News wrote:
Gordon Murray, ex-McLaren F1 designer and the pen behind the Caparo T1 supercar, but also because the car itself is an ambitious project. Designed to be tiny, efficient and flexible, the T25 has finally been revealed ahead of its first public appearance at the Smith School’s World Forum on Enterprise and the Environment in Oxford.

For those unfamiliar with the T25, it’s basically a design for a new type and class of personal transport vehicle that offers solutions to reduce congestion and parking problems whilst addressing the issue of full lifecycle CO2 damage. Murray is planning a range of body styles for the T25, including a van, pickup truck, taxi, police car, cabrio and even an MPV.

Source 1: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2010/06/ … 502308417/

Di mentions and performance:

Source 2: http://www.speedlux.com/gordon-murrays- … tos-specs/

The T27 will be all electric will have a range of 80-100 miles.

Source 3: http://www.allcarselectric.com/blog/104 … ew-t-27-ev

Source 4: http://www.gordonmurraydesign.com/

---

These types of small cars I have to say look as safe as driving a motorcycle.

2010-06-29 22:33:42

#2

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX

So buy a Tesla.

Fuck Israel

2010-06-29 22:35:12

#3

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,056|7057|PNW

Can't they make us something that looks like a Batmobile from the outside too?!

2010-06-29 23:22:53

#4

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6866|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Sounds good to me. If the insurance is cheap I'd drive one.

...as long as its got AC, I needs my AC.

harmor wrote:
These types of small cars I have to say look as safe as driving a motorcycle.

and a plane could crash into my house tonight. one way or another, life will kill you. no reason to fuss over the size of a car.

2010-06-29 23:58:28

#5

=NHB=Shadow: hi; +322|6651|California

no room for hoes? count me out!

2010-06-30 00:01:25

#6

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6866|the dank(super) side of Oregon

=NHB=Shadow wrote:
no room for hoes? count me out!

that's why you buy the ho trailer.

2010-06-30 00:44:39

#7

tazz.: oz.; +1,339|6459|Sydney | ♥

i'm 2m tall.

....thread irrelevant to me. XD

^{everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... _{seriously. ♥}}

2010-06-30 02:07:04

#8

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6934

I don't understand why it's so hard to design an efficient car that doesn't look hideous. I really don't understand it. There are thousands upon thousands of people that would be all over these cars if only they didn't make them look like someone crashed a Smart car.

2010-06-30 02:30:04

#9

oug: Calmer than you are.; +380|6804|Πάϊ

Reciprocity wrote:
harmor wrote:
These types of small cars I have to say look as safe as driving a motorcycle.
and a plane could crash into my house tonight. one way or another, life will kill you. no reason to fuss over the size of a car.

Yea but there's also paralysis and a whole bunch of stuff you could get that's worse than dying... so safety is an issue.

other than that... it seems ok... crappy design is expectable tbh...

_ƒ³

2010-06-30 04:40:14

#10

13rin: Member; +977|6764

Screw that! I'll keep my 10mpg Jeep and 180mph Duc thank you very much.

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

2010-06-30 18:32:11

#11

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6690|North Carolina

Dilbert_X wrote:
So buy a Tesla.

Too expensive... not very reliable either... Granted, they do look cool and are fast as hell.

2010-06-30 21:49:02

#12

=NHB=Shadow: hi; +322|6651|California

DBBrinson1 wrote:
Screw that! I'll keep my 10mpg Jeep and 180mph Duc thank you very much.

and i thought my 12-13mpg around the city was bad

2010-07-01 07:38:46

#13

TSI: Cholera in the time of love; +247|6266|Toronto

65 mph isn't quite enough. And besides, I bet it's got no gear change mechanism. So no thanks. I'll stick with my 8000 dollar 951.

I like pie.

2010-07-01 09:21:35

#14

The_Guardsman: Tally Ho!!; +81|7030|I'm not sure.... Buts its dark

I have visions of traveling at more than 40mph, having to do an emergency stop and just rolling on to the roof!

2010-07-01 19:44:43

#15

mcgid1: Meh...; +129|7002|Austin, TX/San Antonio, TX

It look like the bastard child of a Smartcar and one of those deep sea rovers. If you can design a super-efficient car that doesn't look like something out of a bad sci-fi movie and actually has decent leg room, I might consider purchasing one. Until then, I'll stick to what I have.

2010-07-02 01:43:16

#16

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6850|Area 51

ghettoperson wrote:
I don't understand why it's so hard to design an efficient car that doesn't look hideous. I really don't understand it. There are thousands upon thousands of people that would be all over these cars if only they didn't make them look like someone crashed a Smart car.

/Agree

2010-07-02 04:07:11

#17

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6960|Canberra, AUS

RDMC wrote:
ghettoperson wrote:
I don't understand why it's so hard to design an efficient car that doesn't look hideous. I really don't understand it. There are thousands upon thousands of people that would be all over these cars if only they didn't make them look like someone crashed a Smart car.
/Agree

Also agreed, people are well-intentioned but not suicidal

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2010-07-03 08:08:03

#18

Harmor: Error_Name_Not_Found; +605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA

Spark wrote:
RDMC wrote:
ghettoperson wrote:
I don't understand why it's so hard to design an efficient car that doesn't look hideous. I really don't understand it. There are thousands upon thousands of people that would be all over these cars if only they didn't make them look like someone crashed a Smart car.
/Agree
Also agreed, people are well-intentioned but not suicidal

I wonder if with the increased CAFE standards we would eventually have to drive these types of vehicles?

BF2S Forums Your Next car: 62 mpg (86g/km) 65mph (105km) for for $9000 (€7372)

Fox News wrote:

harmor wrote:

=NHB=Shadow wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

harmor wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

RDMC wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Spark wrote:

RDMC wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Board footer