Here we go again.
Remember you heard it from me first; this will become another epic cluster fuck.
We have BP doing ' risky ' drilling having been given special rights to drill offshore after having created an artificial island.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/us/24rig.html
Remember you heard it from me first; this will become another epic cluster fuck.
We have BP doing ' risky ' drilling having been given special rights to drill offshore after having created an artificial island.
It really sucks being right about so many bad things.But BP’s project, called Liberty, has been exempted as regulators have granted it status as an “onshore” project even though it is about three miles off the coast in the Beaufort Sea. The reason: it sits on an artificial island — a 31-acre pile of gravel in about 22 feet of water — built by BP.
Oh. My. God.Rather than conducting their own independent analysis, federal regulators, in a break from usual practice, allowed BP in 2007 to write its own environmental review for the project as well as its own consultation documents relating to the Endangered Species Act, according to two scientists from the Alaska office of the federal Mineral Management Service that oversees drilling.
Sound familiar???“The whole process for approving Liberty was bizarre,” one of the federal scientists said.
The scientists and other critics say they are worried about a replay of the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico because the Liberty project involves a method of drilling called extended reach that experts say is more prone to the types of gas kicks that triggered the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon.
“It makes no sense,” said Rebecca Noblin, the Alaska director for the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental watchdog group. “BP pushes the envelope in the gulf and ends up causing the moratorium. And now in the Arctic they are forging ahead again with untested technology, and as a result they’re the only ones left being allowed to drill there.”
BP has defended the project in its proposal, saying it is safe and environmentally friendly. It declined to respond to requests for further comment.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/us/24rig.html
Last edited by ATG (2010-06-24 20:07:08)