cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6981|NJ

SenorToenails wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

I'm talking about this:

http://bostonherald.com/blogs/entertain … uburbs.jpg

So I can't cross the street to my neighbor's without walking 200m down the street, then across, then 200m back?
I grew up in suburbia, and I have never had a problem with my jaywalking.
But honestly you COULD get a ticket for it.

Which is again why I want to know what the story was.

Like a "this 17 year old lady walked right out into traffice almost causing two accidents, when the police officer tried to issue a ticket for Jaywalking is when this happened"
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5759|Ventura, California

Bertster7 wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

I'm talking about this:

http://bostonherald.com/blogs/entertain … uburbs.jpg

So I can't cross the street to my neighbor's without walking 200m down the street, then across, then 200m back?
And the picture posted to illustrate the point looks like this:

http://www.sacdot.com/services/images/c … rg_img.jpg

Looks similar.
No it does not look similar at all.

One is a picture of two pairs of parallel lines and the other is a large suburban housing area with like one crosswalk every 300 miles.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6934

Macbeth wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Macbeth wrote:


It was a quote from the link retard
lol you're funny Macbeth. And by funny I mean pathetic. Quotes generally have quotation marks around them, or [quote] tags. Which Fass just fixed, making it infinitely more readable.
Learn to read. He said "or in wikianswers" before he posted it. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what he meant. Your just like ruispelia now.
Look, I'm aware you don't like me because I constantly make fun of you, but there's a time and a place to call me out if you want to make yourself feel big. This isn't one of them, this is just unnecessary pedantry. If you'd like to stop filling this thread with unrelated crap, feel free to PM me about it if it really bothers you that much.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

-Sh1fty- wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

I'm talking about this:

http://bostonherald.com/blogs/entertain … uburbs.jpg

So I can't cross the street to my neighbor's without walking 200m down the street, then across, then 200m back?
And the picture posted to illustrate the point looks like this:

http://www.sacdot.com/services/images/c … rg_img.jpg

Looks similar.
No it does not look similar at all.

One is a picture of two pairs of parallel lines and the other is a large suburban housing area with like one crosswalk every 300 miles.
I'm not talking about the road markings. I'm talking about the surroundings - very similar. Both very open, very green, very suburban.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6415|North Tonawanda, NY

cpt.fass1 wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

I'm talking about this:

http://bostonherald.com/blogs/entertain … uburbs.jpg

So I can't cross the street to my neighbor's without walking 200m down the street, then across, then 200m back?
I grew up in suburbia, and I have never had a problem with my jaywalking.
But honestly you COULD get a ticket for it.

Which is again why I want to know what the story was.

Like a "this 17 year old lady walked right out into traffice almost causing two accidents, when the police officer tried to issue a ticket for Jaywalking is when this happened"
Absolutely!  I know I can....which is also why I don't do it in front of police. 

I also want to know what the story is, because it just sounds petty that she would get a jaywalking citation--but then, if she carelessly charged out into traffic, she deserves one!
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5871

Naw dude its just that like nowdays most of your post are stupid comments or you failing to get the joke because you are a 7ft down syndrome child but really you need up your quality.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

SenorToenails wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:


I grew up in suburbia, and I have never had a problem with my jaywalking.
But honestly you COULD get a ticket for it.

Which is again why I want to know what the story was.

Like a "this 17 year old lady walked right out into traffice almost causing two accidents, when the police officer tried to issue a ticket for Jaywalking is when this happened"
Absolutely!  I know I can....which is also why I don't do it in front of police. 

I also want to know what the story is, because it just sounds petty that she would get a jaywalking citation--but then, if she carelessly charged out into traffic, she deserves one!
And in all countries without jaywalking laws there are other laws that could be used for people who walk out into traffic. I've seen someone get arrested for trying to cross a motorway.

I really can't see the need for it.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6415|North Tonawanda, NY

Bertster7 wrote:

And in all countries without jaywalking laws there are other laws that could be used for people who walk out into traffic. I've seen someone get arrested for trying to cross a motorway.

I really can't see the need for it.
So you have your equivalent?  I'm pretty sure no one was suggesting the proliferation of jaywalking laws...  :p
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6981|NJ
We also can't make lefts over double yellow lines.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6937|USA

cpt.fass1 wrote:

lowing wrote:

ATG wrote:


The cops would have more friends if they weren't letting drunk police chiefs off, fabricating evidence and frequently dropping unarmed civilians in a hail of gunfire. Sort of like politicians; they earn every ounce of hate and actually deserve a lot more than they get.


Lets look at the charge, jaywalking.

A nuisance law designed to circumvent Darwanism and collect money for the city.
In fact 85% of the laws the police enforce are nuisance laws that serve no purpose other than to raise money. They shouldn't even be called police, they should be called revenuers.


Fuck 'em!
jay walking isn't the issue, assaulting a police officer is.
Jay walking is the issue, it's what started the confrontation.
no assaulting the cop is what started the issue, if not for that we would not be talking about any of it.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

lowing wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

lowing wrote:


jay walking isn't the issue, assaulting a police officer is.
Jay walking is the issue, it's what started the confrontation.
no assaulting the cop is what started the issue, if not for that we would not be talking about any of it.
Why did the cop get assaulted?

Was it because he was issuing a jay walking ticket?

The ticket was how the encounter began. That is the start of the incident.



For it to have started by the cop getting assaulted they would've had to be attacked randomly before any other interaction between them and the other party. As it stands, that's not what happened.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6981|NJ

Bertster7 wrote:

lowing wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:


Jay walking is the issue, it's what started the confrontation.
no assaulting the cop is what started the issue, if not for that we would not be talking about any of it.
Why did the cop get assaulted?

Was it because he was issuing a jay walking ticket?

The ticket was how the encounter began. That is the start of the incident.



For it to have started by the cop getting assaulted they would've had to be attacked randomly before any other interaction between them and the other party. As it stands, that's not what happened.
I think what lowing is saying is that if she just took her ticket like a good little girl that there would have been NO issue. But in reality the Jaywalking and if that was bullshit really is what starts the incident.

If you get pulled over, have a gun in your car and the attorney gets the reason for the stop thrown out. The gun doesn't matter anymore.
Gamematt
Stocking ur medpacks
+135|6948|Groningen, The Netherlands
I think officers should be allowed to use a hard hand, especially when people put their hands on them.
The Police is getting less and less 'respect' by citizens each day, all around the world.
Like 10yo kids here calling them names, a kick in the butt is what they deserve. People should not make big problems out of little things.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6981|NJ
I think Officers are getting seen what they are, in the states now a days. Not so much as a group that protects and serves the community, but as ATG said a revenue generator.  When majority of people are poor or out of work a 300 dollar ticket is way to much, we pay taxes for protection and civil servants, not to get raped by laws that don't adjust to economic swings.

So between the increase of Police shooting suspects, to the heavy handedness of the law and the lack of other services people are getting aggravated.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6937|USA

Bertster7 wrote:

lowing wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:


Jay walking is the issue, it's what started the confrontation.
no assaulting the cop is what started the issue, if not for that we would not be talking about any of it.
Why did the cop get assaulted?

Was it because he was issuing a jay walking ticket?

The ticket was how the encounter began. That is the start of the incident.



For it to have started by the cop getting assaulted they would've had to be attacked randomly before any other interaction between them and the other party. As it stands, that's not what happened.
I suppose you think that a cop should not confront a speeder either, ya know, just in case it might escalate into something more than just a speeding ticket. Your logic that the cop should not have stopped the girl therefore would not have been assaulted is about as fucked up as logic as there ever was. But hey, from this forum I expect nothing less.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6415|North Tonawanda, NY

lowing wrote:

I suppose you think that a cop should not confront a speeder either, ya know, just in case it might escalate into something more than just a speeding ticket. Your logic that the cop should not have stopped the girl therefore would not have been assaulted is about as fucked up as logic as there ever was. But hey, from this forum I expect nothing less.
Uhhh...the interaction between the original two parties was due to the jaywalking, but it was escalated to assault by the friend who got pwned...

Last edited by SenorToenails (2010-06-21 16:19:35)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6937|USA

SenorToenails wrote:

lowing wrote:

I suppose you think that a cop should not confront a speeder either, ya know, just in case it might escalate into something more than just a speeding ticket. Your logic that the cop should not have stopped the girl therefore would not have been assaulted is about as fucked up as logic as there ever was. But hey, from this forum I expect nothing less.
Uhhh...the interaction between the original two parties was due to the jaywalking, but it was escalated to assault by the friend who got pwned...
yeah and?
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6415|North Tonawanda, NY

lowing wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:

lowing wrote:

I suppose you think that a cop should not confront a speeder either, ya know, just in case it might escalate into something more than just a speeding ticket. Your logic that the cop should not have stopped the girl therefore would not have been assaulted is about as fucked up as logic as there ever was. But hey, from this forum I expect nothing less.
Uhhh...the interaction between the original two parties was due to the jaywalking, but it was escalated to assault by the friend who got pwned...
yeah and?
yeah and yesterday you disagreed that jaywalking had anything to do with it.
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5759|Ventura, California
Jaywalking wasn't the problem. The resisting arrest, assaulting the officer and not taking the citation were the problem.

If the woman had just taken her ticket there would be no problem. 

The cop trying to give her a citation for jaywalking wasn't the start. If she had crossed the road where she should have then this wouldn't have happened.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6937|USA

SenorToenails wrote:

lowing wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:


Uhhh...the interaction between the original two parties was due to the jaywalking, but it was escalated to assault by the friend who got pwned...
yeah and?
yeah and yesterday you disagreed that jaywalking had anything to do with it.
Jaywalking had absolutely nothing to with the cop punching the shit outta that bitch. Assaulting him had everything to do with it.
HollisHurlbut
Member
+51|6283

cpt.fass1 wrote:

crossing the street shouldn't be against the law
It isn't, Mr. Melodrama.  Crossing the street at an undesignated location is against the law because it provides for the orderly flow of traffic.

Regardless, whether you think it should be against the law or not, it is against the law now.

So seeing how this was over a jay walking offense, I can already tell you that the cops head was in a confrontational stage.
You don't know jack shit.

This wasn't over jaywalking.  It started with jaywalking, but then escalated to essentially fleeing a police officer, then assault on a police officer.  That's what this was over: THE ASSAULT.

And in case any of you namby-pamby pantywaste "don't hit a girl" fairies didn't notice, she put her hands up again immediately after pushing him.  A reasonable officer is not at all out of line in assuming that she's likely to assault him again.

Bitch got what she deserved.

Last edited by HollisHurlbut (2010-06-22 20:46:13)

HollisHurlbut
Member
+51|6283

cpt.fass1 wrote:

If you get pulled over, have a gun in your car and the attorney gets the reason for the stop thrown out. The gun doesn't matter anymore.
Wrong analogy.  Even if Jaywalking Bitch could manage to get the jaywalking charge dropped on an unlawful stop ground (and if she actually was jaywalking, that'd be pretty hard), Shoving Bitch still has no recourse because she can't assert that she was stopped because of anything other than the assault.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX

HollisHurlbut wrote:

Wrong analogy.  Even if Jaywalking Bitch could manage to get the jaywalking charge dropped on an unlawful stop ground (and if she actually was jaywalking, that'd be pretty hard), Shoving Bitch still has no recourse because she can't assert that she was stopped because of anything other than the assault.
I think a lot of people in this thread have mummy issues.
Fuck Israel
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6981|NJ
I already said that the assault was just, I was just wondering what started the confrontation. If she was just being a ghetto head, in the ghetto people take for ever to cross the road and don't really pay attention to the cars, or if he was sitting in the car and just saw a person crossing the street and wanted to fill a quota. There is being reasonable with breaking a law like Jaywalking and then there's just being stupid. I want to know which this girl was doing.

I've been put in danger by a police officer before and not everything they do is really correct.

Someone barely ran a red light on a two lane road and the cop saw it. He then proceeded to pull into oncoming traffic to catch said criminal. It actually put the public in more danger then the initial crime.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6981|NJ

HollisHurlbut wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

If you get pulled over, have a gun in your car and the attorney gets the reason for the stop thrown out. The gun doesn't matter anymore.
Wrong analogy.  Even if Jaywalking Bitch could manage to get the jaywalking charge dropped on an unlawful stop ground (and if she actually was jaywalking, that'd be pretty hard), Shoving Bitch still has no recourse because she can't assert that she was stopped because of anything other than the assault.
Also depending on the "Crime" that was commited, it might be harrisment by the officer. Yes I know cops can do no wrong, but they can. A cop in New Jersey was just shot for fucking some dudes wife.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard