How 50's of you.Varegg wrote:
I usually smack people right in the face to calm them down also ...
Average cost of mugging, 20 to 100 dollars cash. Average cost of ticket + court cost + fines + surcharges = 250-300 dollars. But fuck them poor people they do what I say.ATG wrote:
The cops would have more friends if they weren't letting drunk police chiefs off, fabricating evidence and frequently dropping unarmed civilians in a hail of gunfire. Sort of like politicians; they earn every ounce of hate and actually deserve a lot more than they get.lowing wrote:
In fact the crowd should help the cop in trouble if that crowd had anyone worth a fuck in it.
Lets look at the charge, jaywalking.
A nuisance law designed to circumvent Darwanism and collect money for the city.
In fact 85% of the laws the police enforce are nuisance laws that serve no purpose other than to raise money. They shouldn't even be called police, they should be called revenuers.
Fuck 'em!
One of the articles about Utah I came across while doing my research about maybe living there.cpt.fass1 wrote:
Average cost of mugging, 20 to 100 dollars cash. Average cost of ticket + court cost + fines + surcharges = 250-300 dollars. But fuck them poor people they do what I say.ATG wrote:
The cops would have more friends if they weren't letting drunk police chiefs off, fabricating evidence and frequently dropping unarmed civilians in a hail of gunfire. Sort of like politicians; they earn every ounce of hate and actually deserve a lot more than they get.lowing wrote:
In fact the crowd should help the cop in trouble if that crowd had anyone worth a fuck in it.
Lets look at the charge, jaywalking.
A nuisance law designed to circumvent Darwanism and collect money for the city.
In fact 85% of the laws the police enforce are nuisance laws that serve no purpose other than to raise money. They shouldn't even be called police, they should be called revenuers.
Fuck 'em!
If you can stomach it.
You used to live in Jersey city so you prob have been at that stretch of kennedy blvd between Saint Peters and NJCU that has all of those cones in the middle of the road. If it wasn't for those cones a lot of people would die jay walking. Seriously like 10 at night you will get some black person try to rush across the road and you have trouble seeing them because they are so dark.cpt.fass1 wrote:
Average cost of mugging, 20 to 100 dollars cash. Average cost of ticket + court cost + fines + surcharges = 250-300 dollars. But fuck them poor people they do what I say.ATG wrote:
The cops would have more friends if they weren't letting drunk police chiefs off, fabricating evidence and frequently dropping unarmed civilians in a hail of gunfire. Sort of like politicians; they earn every ounce of hate and actually deserve a lot more than they get.lowing wrote:
In fact the crowd should help the cop in trouble if that crowd had anyone worth a fuck in it.
Lets look at the charge, jaywalking.
A nuisance law designed to circumvent Darwanism and collect money for the city.
In fact 85% of the laws the police enforce are nuisance laws that serve no purpose other than to raise money. They shouldn't even be called police, they should be called revenuers.
Fuck 'em!
I'm serious.
jay walking isn't the issue, assaulting a police officer is.ATG wrote:
The cops would have more friends if they weren't letting drunk police chiefs off, fabricating evidence and frequently dropping unarmed civilians in a hail of gunfire. Sort of like politicians; they earn every ounce of hate and actually deserve a lot more than they get.lowing wrote:
In fact the crowd should help the cop in trouble if that crowd had anyone worth a fuck in it.
Lets look at the charge, jaywalking.
A nuisance law designed to circumvent Darwanism and collect money for the city.
In fact 85% of the laws the police enforce are nuisance laws that serve no purpose other than to raise money. They shouldn't even be called police, they should be called revenuers.
Fuck 'em!
Darwinism in the works. If you can't cross a road safely then you probably shouldn't be alive. You also drive around that area and see tons of people crossing the road with no care to the cars, not even a slight interest in their personal safety, that's why they get hit.Macbeth wrote:
You used to live in Jersey city so you prob have been at that stretch of Kennedy blvd between Saint Peters and NJCU that has all of those cones in the middle of the road. If it wasn't for those cones a lot of people would die jay walking. Seriously like 10 at night you will get some black person try to rush across the road and you have trouble seeing them because they are so dark.cpt.fass1 wrote:
Average cost of mugging, 20 to 100 dollars cash. Average cost of ticket + court cost + fines + surcharges = 250-300 dollars. But fuck them poor people they do what I say.ATG wrote:
The cops would have more friends if they weren't letting drunk police chiefs off, fabricating evidence and frequently dropping unarmed civilians in a hail of gunfire. Sort of like politicians; they earn every ounce of hate and actually deserve a lot more than they get.
Lets look at the charge, jaywalking.
A nuisance law designed to circumvent Darwinism and collect money for the city.
In fact 85% of the laws the police enforce are nuisance laws that serve no purpose other than to raise money. They shouldn't even be called police, they should be called revenuers.
Fuck 'em!
I'm serious.
Also that's why I asked if the girl was crossing safely or if she was just being a welfare head endangering people.
@ ATG, we've all seen the plead guilty and we'll give you this, go to court and you can/will receive the maximum punishment. This country is in a sad state of affairs and everyone in it(including Lowing) is a criminal.
Jay walking is the issue, it's what started the confrontation.lowing wrote:
jay walking isn't the issue, assaulting a police officer is.ATG wrote:
The cops would have more friends if they weren't letting drunk police chiefs off, fabricating evidence and frequently dropping unarmed civilians in a hail of gunfire. Sort of like politicians; they earn every ounce of hate and actually deserve a lot more than they get.lowing wrote:
In fact the crowd should help the cop in trouble if that crowd had anyone worth a fuck in it.
Lets look at the charge, jaywalking.
A nuisance law designed to circumvent Darwanism and collect money for the city.
In fact 85% of the laws the police enforce are nuisance laws that serve no purpose other than to raise money. They shouldn't even be called police, they should be called revenuers.
Fuck 'em!
Oh crap I'm screwed! I'm so used to jay walking here in Europe I know I'm gona get nailed when I move to the US.
Where exactly are not allowed to cross except on sidewalks?
Where exactly are not allowed to cross except on sidewalks?
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
I'm struggling to understand why crossing a road is a crime. I mean here you look both ways and if you have time to cross you walk across. What's the deal?
http://www.sacdot.com/services/images/c … rg_img.jpg-Sh1fty- wrote:
Oh crap I'm screwed! I'm so used to jay walking here in Europe I know I'm gona get nailed when I move to the US.
Where exactly are not allowed to cross except on sidewalks?
In between Those lines or you risk a 79-200 dollar ticket. Or in Wikianswers
i got a ticket a month ago for jaywalking and it was $174, since im poor and didnt want to pay it i went to court and the judge told me to write a 1 1/2 page essay about why jaywalking is bad and 10 hours of community service, because im a minor, if i werent then i would have to pay.
But you know it's a good idea to give poor people 100 dollar tickets, cause it's the law.
Last edited by cpt.fass1 (2010-06-21 12:26:57)
Same here - the whole concept of jaywalking seems really weird to me....jord wrote:
I'm struggling to understand why crossing a road is a crime. I mean here you look both ways and if you have time to cross you walk across. What's the deal?
The idea behind disallowing jay-walking is not to keep people from crossing the street, but to prevent pedestrians from walking out into traffic and getting hit or causing accidents and generally interrupting the flow of things. In busy areas, pedestrians really should use crosswalks for their own safety. On quiet streets, no one really gives a shit if you cross without a crosswalk.Bertster7 wrote:
Same here - the whole concept of jaywalking seems really weird to me....jord wrote:
I'm struggling to understand why crossing a road is a crime. I mean here you look both ways and if you have time to cross you walk across. What's the deal?
You're a minor? IIRC you have facial hair to rival Grizzly Adams...cpt.fass1 wrote:
http://www.sacdot.com/services/images/c … rg_img.jpg-Sh1fty- wrote:
Oh crap I'm screwed! I'm so used to jay walking here in Europe I know I'm gona get nailed when I move to the US.
Where exactly are not allowed to cross except on sidewalks?
In between Those lines or you risk a 79-200 dollar ticket. Or in Wikianswers
i got a ticket a month ago for jaywalking and it was $174, since im poor and didnt want to pay it i went to court and the judge told me to write a 1 1/2 page essay about why jaywalking is bad and 10 hours of community service, because im a minor, if i werent then i would have to pay.
But you know it's a good idea to give poor people 100 dollar tickets, cause it's the law.
But the reality of it, is to be able to issue a ticket if you aren't crossing at the right part of the road, regardless of if it's safe or not.SenorToenails wrote:
The idea behind disallowing jay-walking is not to keep people from crossing the street, but to prevent pedestrians from walking out into traffic and getting hit or causing accidents and generally interrupting the flow of things. In busy areas, pedestrians really should use crosswalks for their own safety. On quiet streets, no one really gives a shit if you cross without a crosswalk.Bertster7 wrote:
Same here - the whole concept of jaywalking seems really weird to me....jord wrote:
I'm struggling to understand why crossing a road is a crime. I mean here you look both ways and if you have time to cross you walk across. What's the deal?
We're raising a bunch of retards in the country.
It was a quote from the link retardghettoperson wrote:
You're a minor? IIRC you have facial hair to rival Grizzly Adams...cpt.fass1 wrote:
http://www.sacdot.com/services/images/c … rg_img.jpg-Sh1fty- wrote:
Oh crap I'm screwed! I'm so used to jay walking here in Europe I know I'm gona get nailed when I move to the US.
Where exactly are not allowed to cross except on sidewalks?
In between Those lines or you risk a 79-200 dollar ticket. Or in Wikianswers
i got a ticket a month ago for jaywalking and it was $174, since im poor and didnt want to pay it i went to court and the judge told me to write a 1 1/2 page essay about why jaywalking is bad and 10 hours of community service, because im a minor, if i werent then i would have to pay.
But you know it's a good idea to give poor people 100 dollar tickets, cause it's the law.
Whoops my bad forgot the quotes.ghettoperson wrote:
You're a minor? IIRC you have facial hair to rival Grizzly Adams...cpt.fass1 wrote:
http://www.sacdot.com/services/images/c … rg_img.jpg-Sh1fty- wrote:
Oh crap I'm screwed! I'm so used to jay walking here in Europe I know I'm gona get nailed when I move to the US.
Where exactly are not allowed to cross except on sidewalks?
In between Those lines or you risk a 79-200 dollar ticket. Or in Wikianswers
"i got a ticket a month ago for jaywalking and it was $174, since im poor and didnt want to pay it i went to court and the judge told me to write a 1 1/2 page essay about why jaywalking is bad and 10 hours of community service, because im a minor, if i werent then i would have to pay."
But you know it's a good idea to give poor people 100 dollar tickets, cause it's the law.
Sounds ridiculous.SenorToenails wrote:
The idea behind disallowing jay-walking is not to keep people from crossing the street, but to prevent pedestrians from walking out into traffic and getting hit or causing accidents and generally interrupting the flow of things. In busy areas, pedestrians really should use crosswalks for their own safety. On quiet streets, no one really gives a shit if you cross without a crosswalk.Bertster7 wrote:
Same here - the whole concept of jaywalking seems really weird to me....jord wrote:
I'm struggling to understand why crossing a road is a crime. I mean here you look both ways and if you have time to cross you walk across. What's the deal?
You just cross when it is safe to do so. Not getting hit by cars is a better incentive to be careful than having fines. That makes the fines redundant as a mechanism to stop pedestrians getting hit by cars.
But what about in the suburbs like on your street and stuff?
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
The picture posted above to illustrate this looks a lot like suburbs to me....-Sh1fty- wrote:
But what about in the suburbs like on your street and stuff?
lol you're funny Macbeth. And by funny I mean pathetic. Quotes generally have quotation marks around them, or [quote] tags. Which Fass just fixed, making it infinitely more readable.Macbeth wrote:
It was a quote from the link retardghettoperson wrote:
You're a minor? IIRC you have facial hair to rival Grizzly Adams...cpt.fass1 wrote:
http://www.sacdot.com/services/images/crosswalks_lrg_img.jpg
In between Those lines or you risk a 79-200 dollar ticket. Or in Wikianswers
i got a ticket a month ago for jaywalking and it was $174, since im poor and didnt want to pay it i went to court and the judge told me to write a 1 1/2 page essay about why jaywalking is bad and 10 hours of community service, because im a minor, if i werent then i would have to pay.
But you know it's a good idea to give poor people 100 dollar tickets, cause it's the law.
In a perfect world, I agree with you. I jaywalk all the time following those guidelines, and I have never been given a ticket. But then...I have been driving and some jackass strolls out into the street and expects the traffic to come to a screeching halt for him. That's what the tickets are really meant for.Bertster7 wrote:
Sounds ridiculous.
You just cross when it is safe to do so. Not getting hit by cars is a better incentive to be careful than having fines. That makes the fines redundant as a mechanism to stop pedestrians getting hit by cars.
In this case, she may have done just that--walk into traffic, make everyone stop, and generally pose a large road hazard. That is ticket worthy. But we don't know since the video didn't start until after.
I'm talking about this:
So I can't cross the street to my neighbor's without walking 200m down the street, then across, then 200m back?
So I can't cross the street to my neighbor's without walking 200m down the street, then across, then 200m back?
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
I grew up in suburbia, and I have never had a problem with my jaywalking.-Sh1fty- wrote:
I'm talking about this:
http://bostonherald.com/blogs/entertain … uburbs.jpg
So I can't cross the street to my neighbor's without walking 200m down the street, then across, then 200m back?
And the picture posted to illustrate the point looks like this:-Sh1fty- wrote:
I'm talking about this:
http://bostonherald.com/blogs/entertain … uburbs.jpg
So I can't cross the street to my neighbor's without walking 200m down the street, then across, then 200m back?
Looks similar.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2010-06-21 12:50:24)
Learn to read. He said "or in wikianswers" before he posted it. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what he meant. Your just like ruispelia now.ghettoperson wrote:
lol you're funny Macbeth. And by funny I mean pathetic. Quotes generally have quotation marks around them, or [quote] tags. Which Fass just fixed, making it infinitely more readable.Macbeth wrote:
It was a quote from the link retardghettoperson wrote:
You're a minor? IIRC you have facial hair to rival Grizzly Adams...