Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6965|Canberra, AUS
I actually don't really know how to tackle the obesity problem. Anyone who says "oh don't worry about it" is obviously a fool but obviously government can't just stomp around and whatnot.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7011|Sydney, Australia

Spark wrote:

I actually don't really know how to tackle the obesity problem. Anyone who says "oh don't worry about it" is obviously a fool but obviously government can't just stomp around and whatnot.
Here's an idea..
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6858|Mountains of NC

https://blogs.bet.com/entertainment/staytuned/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/snooki.jpg

snooki does not approve of this tax
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5876

I would prefer a pale girl over an orange one.
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5992|College Park, MD
Word. And there are plenty of whites who don't look pale and also don't go to tanning salons. It'd be racist if white women and gay white males HAD to use tanning salons in order to live or something. Using one is a choice.

Last edited by Hurricane2k9 (2010-06-12 07:30:49)

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6871|SE London

JohnG@lt wrote:

mcminty wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


It's their own body and their own money. I don't see why it should be anyone elses business, least of all some busybodies in Washington, ya know?
Yeah, but given that tanning is likely to increase the incidence of skin cancer, the cost of the resulting healthcare is typically borne by society.
No, it would be borne by their health insurance. Or, you could do without insur... oh wait.
That's right, because public healthcare spending in the US is 0.....


Oh wait....

It's actually higher per capita than in Europe.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard